by Edgar J. Steele "...and I'm glad we killed him!" Thus went one of the more virulent of my recent hate mailers, who went on to proclaim the racial superiority of his being Jewish. He never said what, in particular, set him off, or if, in fact, it was anything I ever had written. His intent seemed merely to stun and outrage me. He failed. A great many other Jewish haters have echoed this fellow's vitriol-laced message by threatening to kill me, my wife and our children. (this particularly arrogant Jew actually identified himself - he is Mark Wiles, Nevada-based thug for the Jewish Defense League). Call it Internet graffiti. I've gotten used to it. However, I invite you to be outraged. In fact, I encourage you to be outraged. But, don't even pretend to be amazed at the brazen and incredibly hostile behavior of the Jews behind it all. You have known about it all along and you have known full well that it is no coincidence that the perps are Jewish. You know that is the very reason for their behavior. You have pretended not to notice. Well, I am not inclined to allow you this little self deception any longer. It is the general lack of outrage on the part of most Americans in the face of the Jewish campaign against Western civilization in general and Christianity, specifically, that I find amazing. This is Not a Religious Issue Now, don't confuse this ranting of mine today with anything resembling a religious diatribe. Or me with a rapture bunny. Why, I don't even go to church - but, then, I doubt that Christ would attend, either, given the state of modern religion (a discussion for another day). If you are not religious or if you actually dare to admit you are not a Christian, the Jewish assault upon Christianity still is your fight, because Christianity merely is the symbol. You, gentle reader, are the target. You know it is true, too. Admit it. Do not stand idly by and allow others like myself to carry our standard into battle alone, simply because you pretend not to be at war. You may not be interested in this particular war, but rest assured that this war irretrievably is interested in you. It may be that I will be among the second or the third wave of casualties (the first wave already has been taken down and killed or imprisoned), but that does not mean that you will escape the onslaught. On the contrary - rest assured that, should you allow the battle line to reach your ranks before bothering to pitch in and help, then you will be praying to God to save you, regardless of your particular religious leaning today. That's Mr. Anti-Semite to You! Do not mistake all the Jewish hatred being spewed in every direction these days for justifiable responses to anti-Semitism (whatever that means, since the very term presumes no provocation). The threats to which you just listened, above, were delivered to my wife, my little children and myself before I ever said one word, aloud or in print, that could even have been mistaken for being anti-Semitic! Both the ADL and the SPLC claim that, only in recent years have I "disclosed" my inherent anti-Semitism. What they refuse to consider, as always is the case with Jews accusing others of being anti-Semites, is the fact that they made me into what you see today. Unlike so many others today, I offer no apology. They should be apologizing to me. To all comers, I say, "That's Mr. Anti-Semite to you!" "We killed Jesus and We're Proud of It" You think the email I mentioned above is just one nut case venting? You may be right about the nut-case part, but his attitude is far more prevalent and hostile than most possibly could imagine. Visit this web site and click on the picture for an unsettling video of an Israeli threatening Palestinian Christians in their own home, telling them, "We killed Jesus and we're proud of it." This increasingly-open assault upon the sanctity of Christianity has nothing to do with religion. If, like most, you are not a participating member of organized - dare I say "institutionalized?" - Christianity in America (or elsewhere, for that matter), this still affects you. You can be an atheist, yet still you should be outraged! Why? Because Christianity so firmly is embedded in our racial background, that's why. Christianity is an inextricable part of our heritage - of all that makes us who and what we are. Not the religious stuff, whatever that means, but the ethos ... the lifestyle ... the principles and creed by which we conduct ourselves and treat others. Take it Personally Take it personally, in other words. Believe me, those who send me such sentiments as I have today recounted take personally anything they decide is anti-Semitic and their response is anything but religious in nature or intent. This is a racial war and, like it or not, you are a participant. The quote that I paraphrased above,"You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you," is an aphorism generally attributed to Leon Trotsky, Russian adherent of Karl Marx and a prime architect of conditions leading to the mass execution of upwards of 80 million White Christians in Russia last century. It is not at all ironic that Trotsky (born Lev Bronstein), like virtually all of his fellow Communist travelers, was Jewish. My experience isn't unique, nor is it confined to those of us who dare to use the "J" word in the context of what is wrong with the world today. All who dare suggest a racial basis for the avarice and aggression now carrying America over the edge and into the maw of the coming world conflagration and, what's more, who dare identify that race as Jewish, have grown accustomed to my low-browed correspondent's sort of harsh rhetoric. The Cut that Hurts Here's what hurts: Getting similar hostility from my own countrymen of European extraction. No, not specifically comments like today's about Christianity, though that occasionally does issue forth from our side of the fence. It's the hostility and anger, even the marginalization and indifference concerning any sort of warning or complaint that links danger to Jews, generally. No good deed goes unpunished. Notice that I do not resort to the common cop-out of most who venture into these waters and merely bemoan "Zionists." That is the politically-correct way of being politically incorrect these days. Yes, it is the racially-supremacist, "me first, you dead" outlook of the Zionist that I find particularly offensive, but that outlook, in itself, is racially based. How could it be otherwise? Think about that for a moment, because the logically-inescapable racial basis of Semitism and anti-Semitism generally goes unrecognized. When is a Jew not a Jew? And, yes, I know all about Khazaria and true Semites and the results of the Roman diaspora (dispersion of a people formerly concentrated in one place) of Biblical Jews. You and I both know what I mean when I say "Jew," so don't get distracted with irrelevant, albeit true, history. Consider the following proposition very carefully - no, seriously, get ready to do some slow, clear thinking right about ... here: How could it be possible for racial antipathy to be based upon anything but race, both coming and going? Stop right there! I saw that. Go read that last paragraph again, even twice. Is It Racial, Religious or Something Else? No, we aren't all the same under the skin just because we all bleed red. Frogs and bugs bleed red, too. This isn't the place to develop the genetic origins of modern cultural bias and limitation. I have developed that concept extensively elsewhere, in my book, Defensive Racism, which I commend to your attention. You might be one who has looked down your nose and dismissed my "sort" as racist or, worse, anti-Semitic. In fact, I'd be surprised if you didn't have some degree of that attitude present in your thinking at this very moment, as you read these very words. Fair enough ... please just read on, though. Having acknowledged your thought, don't you think that, in fairness, I deserve a hearing? I'll be brief. I called this a racial war. Even the most casual observer now must acknowledge that what is taking place in the Middle East is a war fought for Israel and against Muslims. The oil simply is a cynical excuse. We could have bought every last drop of Arab oil, and for much less than we are paying for this insanity. Here's what all our targets have in common: they are the Muslim enemies of Israel. Muslim, not just Arab. Our next target, the Iranians, predominantly are Aryan, not Arab, even if mostly Muslim. Iran ... Aryan. That is no coincidence. One derives directly from the other. Look it up for yourself. What you see in the Middle East today is a war between Judaism and Islam, simply put. Oddly enough, however, it is not a religious war, but a racial war. America - Just Another Jewish Nation ... Or Is It? That's why the Arabs that Americans fight every day refer to Americans as "Jews," a fact you don't see or hear reported by our by our controlled media. Even more oddly, Islam is much closer to Christianity than is Judaism, the latter of which is nothing more than secular humanism, or self worship, in the final analysis. Muslims revere Jesus Christ and acknowledge His special place. Muslims regard their own Mohammed as only a prophet, though held in very high regard. Again, go look it up for yourself. You won't believe me, otherwise. That business flying around the Internet about the Koran being a book of exclusion and a manual for aggression? About Islam's objective being the killing of all infidels, with all infidels being non-Muslims? About Islam being so unforgiving as to require the mutilation of children for stealing bread? Pure propaganda, false in every regard, designed to whip up Western support for the racial war being waged against the followers of Islam. Jews vs. Everybody Else A different sort of war is being waged throughout Western civilization, with countries like Germany, Austria, Britain and Canada farther along and actually imprisoning those who speak just as I do today. That is why I dare not visit those countries, even if I never said a word while within their borders. It, too, is a racial war, being fought in the classic Jewish way: Brother against brother, while Jews stand by, wailing loudly about their victimhood, all the while supplying both sides. This peculiar war ultimately pits Judaism against Christianity. Again, however, it is not really religious, but racial. Christianity solidly is in the heritage of Europeans and European-Americans. Religion is the excuse. Race is the target. We Love Jesus ... Not! Just as always, they have us fighting each other, with even America's Christians now participating in the demise of Christianity. Consider the abject, written apology offered recently by a Virginia Beach Catholic school principal because some of his students chanted "We love Jesus" during a basketball game with a rival Jewish school. Last I heard, the moron had enrolled all those kids in mandatory sensitivity training. Follow the URL in the previous sentence and note well that it is not reported just what the Jewish students had been chanting. Does it matter, though? Think about it for a moment. If you are a Christian, how could you possibly consider any context in which saying "We love Jesus" requires an apology? Didn't Christians endure death in the Roman Coliseum for their faith? Isn't this precisely the manner in which Judas thrice denied Christ? Would somebody out there who knows the guy please point this out to that school principal for me? What Does It Mean to be a Christian Now, I am not particularly religious, I confess, but I am deeply spiritual. What's more, I do my best to lead my life in accordance with the very principles enunciated by Jesus Christ. Yes, I know that true believers need more: they demand that one utter the magic incantation, "I accept Jesus Christ as my personal Lord and Savior," or words to that effect. What on earth does that mean? No, it is a rhetorical question, so please don't send me endless religious tracts, but please do think about it. What would Jesus say about one who acts in accordance with His teachings versus another who merely pays Him lip service? You know the answer, of course. Some of the finest Christians I know never go to church. Some of the most clearly un-Christian hypocrites out there are knee down in pews every Sunday and walk around with Bibles in their hands at all times. You know who you are. Christianity is a way of living, not talking ... action, not posture ... being, not pretending. As I said, this is about culture, about race and heritage, not religion. It is about what we are and the way we are at our very core. Our very existence is a constant reminder to others of what they are not. It may not matter to you, but it certainly does to Jews, regardless of what you might think. Are We What We Do, or What We Say? Here's the punch line: Christian countries do not bomb third-world countries like Iraq and Afghanistan back into the stone age. Jewish countries do, though. Just ask any Palestinian. It was no coincidence that those Lebanese ambulances targeted by Israeli jets during its recent genocidal campaign against the civilian population of southern Lebanon (principally Christian Lebanese, by the way) were holed directly in the center of the red crosses on their roofs. (Ambulances...carrying injured children, of all things.) Nor is it coincidental that the international Red Cross now has agreed, at Israel's insistence, to replace its traditional symbolic cross with ... well, I'm not sure what to call the symbol on this flag held by a Red Cross official, nor am I sure that the organization even will continue to call itself the Red Cross. I am ashamed to admit that, in the past, I have contributed to this shameless, so-called charity with its grotesquely overpaid executives. Never again, however, and don't you do it, either! Yes, of course the Israeli Jews intentionally blew up those ambulances with pinpoint guided rockets simply because of the presence of the crosses on the roofs. Yes, it is far more than coincidence that the penetration was directly in the center of the cross. Don't be naive. Do You Believe in Coincidence? Nor is it coincidence that the nonstop legal assault upon Christianity in America is being brought by Jewish plaintiffs, through Jewish lawyers, heard by Jewish judges. It is America's European culture they are after eradicating, of course, which means our elimination altogether. It's racial, not religious. Stop and think! Why are the borders of every Western civilized nation being held wide open to the third world, after all, quite aside from the profit motive inherent to killing all American industry by moving it overseas? I've said it before: America has become Jewish. By culture. It has crept into our outlook and our attitudes, dispensed largely through the major institutions firmly in Jewish control: media, entertainment and government. Of course, American industry also is largely Jewish controlled, but that, too, simply is another expression of how Jewish we have become. Think not? Just look at the corporate scavengers carving up the spoils in the Middle East. True Blue Jew The coarse nature of our entertainment, which degrades each year to levels unthinkable a generation ago, is yet another mark of America's Jewishness. And Jews themselves proudly point to the pornography industry's effect upon America: "Jewish involvement in pornography has a long history in the United States, as Jews have helped transform a fringe subculture into what has become a primary constituent of Americana. These are the 'true blue' Jews." (Jewish professor Nathan Abrams in an article titled, "Triple Exthnics," published inThe Jewish Quarterly, winter 2004, extensively quoted by David Duke at his website. America's greed and sharp dealings internationally, regarding oil and the supremacy of the US dollar, are singularly Jewish in nature. Oh, come on - why do you think it is that "Jew" is one of the very few racial identifiers to come down through history with a whole separate meaning as a verb? We don't talk of Brit-ing someone or China-ing others, after all! America's new-found international aggression and hostility quite simply is Jewish. No? Then I suppose it merely is coincidence that America is taking down Israel's enemies in order of their threat level. Saddam's fate was sealed by the first scud missile heaved into Tel Aviv during that first Gulf war. Next up, of course: Iran. I suppose that it really should be no surprise that there is no place left in America for those of us who dare to criticize her ever-increasing Jewishness or the bloodthirsty savagery of that other Jewish country: Israel. Why else do you suppose that the Kennedy hate-speech bill keeps getting reintroduced into Congress? Eventually it will pass - probably very soon now and due to the Democrats now in control on Capitol Hill. That is when my voice will be silenced. Here Come Da Pain My prognosis? Pain. Lots and lots of pain. Both economic and physical. Our very destruction as a people and a nation is the objective of our Stockholm-Syndrome-like captors. We are doomed. Even without the coming outright destruction, our cultural conversion to Judaism almost is complete, anyway. How many generations before natural selection would ensure that only the most Jewish acting of those among us would prosper or, even, survive? Always, Jews overreach, create a backlash and then get tossed aside. This time will be no different. Already, the reaction is in movement. Witness my own conversion and newfound mission in life. Before my awakening, I was as unaware of Jews as most of America until just very recently. They created me out of whole cloth. 9-11 and Iraq have been opening many eyes. Israel's outrageous conduct in Lebanon and Palestine, coupled with the obvious Jewish control of America through her leadership, opens even more eyes every day. Salvation or Destruction? Or Both? But our society's imminent destruction contains the seeds of our hope and renewal, as well. Only through the utter destruction of American society can our grandchildren and their children hope to be free of the cultural Judaism that now has all of us in its grip and thereby respond to their own inborn genetic imperative, the same as that which motivated America's founding fathers. That will be their salvation and that of our culture, our race. In reality, perhaps utter destruction is the kindest thing that awaits us, if only for the sake of our descendants. As a race, I am confident that we will survive. We always have. It's what we do best. This will be no exception. We who are alive today will not see it, of course, but it is coming. Of that I am certain. Meanwhile, we all must do what we can to make a difference. Living my life by rock-solid principles, raising up strong, alert, morally strong and mentally healthy children and writing things like this. That is what I do. We all have a role to play. What is yours? New America. An idea whose time has come. My name is Edgar J. Steele. Thanks for listening. Please visit my web site, www.ConspiracyPenPal.com, for other messages just like this one.
> by Edgar J. Steele > "...and I'm glad we killed him!" Thus went one of the more virulent > of my recent hate mailers, who went on to proclaim the racial > superiority of his being Jewish. He never said what, in particular, > set him off, or if, in fact, it was anything I ever had written. His > intent seemed merely to stun and outrage me. He failed. > A great many other Jewish haters have echoed this fellow's > vitriol-laced message by threatening to kill me, my wife and our > children. (this particularly arrogant Jew actually identified > himself - he is Mark Wiles, Nevada-based thug for the Jewish Defense > League).
Sounds like you have a good federal lawsuit you can file. To stop others from doing that too, it might take punitive damages in the mutli-million dollar range, to set an example.
> > Call it Internet graffiti. I've gotten used to it. However, I invite > you to be outraged. In fact, I encourage you to be outraged. But, > don't even pretend to be amazed at the brazen and incredibly hostile > behavior of the Jews behind it all. You have known about it all along > and you have known full well that it is no coincidence that the perps > are Jewish. You know that is the very reason for their behavior. You > have pretended not to notice. Well, I am not inclined to allow you > this little self deception any longer. > It is the general lack of outrage on the part of most Americans in the > face of the Jewish campaign against Western civilization in general > and Christianity, specifically, that I find amazing. > This is Not a Religious Issue > Now, don't confuse this ranting of mine today with anything resembling > a religious diatribe. Or me with a rapture bunny. Why, I don't even > go to church - but, then, I doubt that Christ would attend, either, > given the state of modern religion (a discussion for another day). > If you are not religious or if you actually dare to admit you are not > a Christian, the Jewish assault upon Christianity still is your fight, > because Christianity merely is the symbol. You, gentle reader, are > the target. You know it is true, too. Admit it. > Do not stand idly by and allow others like myself to carry our > standard into battle alone, simply because you pretend not to be at > war. You may not be interested in this particular war, but rest > assured that this war irretrievably is interested in you. > It may be that I will be among the second or the third wave of > casualties (the first wave already has been taken down and killed or > imprisoned), but that does not mean that you will escape the > onslaught. On the contrary - rest assured that, should you allow the > battle line to reach your ranks before bothering to pitch in and help, > then you will be praying to God to save you, regardless of your > particular religious leaning today. > That's Mr. Anti-Semite to You! > Do not mistake all the Jewish hatred being spewed in every direction > these days for justifiable responses to anti-Semitism (whatever that > means, since the very term presumes no provocation). The threats to > which you just listened, above, were delivered to my wife, my little > children and myself before I ever said one word, aloud or in print, > that could even have been mistaken for being anti-Semitic! > Both the ADL and the SPLC claim that, only in recent years have I > "disclosed" my inherent anti-Semitism. What they refuse to consider, > as always is the case with Jews accusing others of being anti-Semites, > is the fact that they made me into what you see today. Unlike so many > others today, I offer no apology. They should be apologizing to me. > To all comers, I say, "That's Mr. Anti-Semite to you!" > "We killed Jesus and We're Proud of It" > You think the email I mentioned above is just one nut case venting? > You may be right about the nut-case part, but his attitude is far more > prevalent and hostile than most possibly could imagine. Visit this > web site and click on the picture for an unsettling video of an > Israeli threatening Palestinian Christians in their own home, telling > them, "We killed Jesus and we're proud of it." > This increasingly-open assault upon the sanctity of Christianity has > nothing to do with religion. If, like most, you are not a > participating member of organized - dare I say "institutionalized?" - > Christianity in America (or elsewhere, for that matter), this still > affects you. You can be an atheist, yet still you should be outraged! > Why? Because Christianity so firmly is embedded in our racial > background, that's why. > Christianity is an inextricable part of our heritage - of all that > makes us who and what we are. Not the religious stuff, whatever that > means, but the ethos ... the lifestyle ... the principles and creed by > which we conduct ourselves and treat others. > Take it Personally > Take it personally, in other words. Believe me, those who send me > such sentiments as I have today recounted take personally anything > they decide is anti-Semitic and their response is anything but > religious in nature or intent. > This is a racial war and, like it or not, you are a participant. The > quote that I paraphrased above,"You may not be interested in war, but > war is interested in you," is an aphorism generally attributed to Leon > Trotsky, Russian adherent of Karl Marx and a prime architect of > conditions leading to the mass execution of upwards of 80 million > White Christians in Russia last century. It is not at all ironic that > Trotsky (born Lev Bronstein), like virtually all of his fellow > Communist travelers, was Jewish. > My experience isn't unique, nor is it confined to those of us who dare > to use the "J" word in the context of what is wrong with the world > today. > All who dare suggest a racial basis for the avarice and aggression > now carrying America over the edge and into the maw of the coming > world conflagration and, what's more, who dare identify that race as > Jewish, have grown accustomed to my low-browed correspondent's sort of > harsh rhetoric. > The Cut that Hurts > Here's what hurts: Getting similar hostility from my own countrymen > of European extraction. No, not specifically comments like today's > about Christianity, though that occasionally does issue forth from our > side of the fence. It's the hostility and anger, even the > marginalization and indifference concerning any sort of warning or > complaint that links danger to Jews, generally. No good deed goes > unpunished. > Notice that I do not resort to the common cop-out of most who venture > into these waters and merely bemoan "Zionists." That is the > politically-correct way of being politically incorrect these days. > Yes, it is the racially-supremacist, "me first, you dead" outlook of > the Zionist that I find particularly offensive, but that outlook, in > itself, is racially based. How could it be otherwise? Think about > that for a moment, because the logically-inescapable racial basis of > Semitism and anti-Semitism generally goes unrecognized. > When is a Jew not a Jew? > And, yes, I know all about Khazaria and true Semites and the results > of the Roman diaspora (dispersion of a people formerly concentrated in > one place) of Biblical Jews. You and I both know what I mean when I > say "Jew," so don't get distracted with irrelevant, albeit true, > history. > Consider the following proposition very carefully - no, seriously, get > ready to do some slow, clear thinking right about ... here: How could > it be possible for racial antipathy to be based upon anything but > race, both coming and going? > Stop right there! I saw that. Go read that last paragraph again, > even twice. > Is It Racial, Religious or Something Else? > No, we aren't all the same under the skin just because we all bleed > red. Frogs and bugs bleed red, too. This isn't the place to develop > the genetic origins of modern cultural bias and limitation. I have > developed that concept extensively elsewhere, in my book, Defensive > Racism, which I commend to your attention. > You might be one who has looked down your nose and dismissed my "sort" > as racist or, worse, anti-Semitic. In fact, I'd be surprised if you > didn't have some degree of that attitude present in your thinking at > this very moment, as you read these very words. Fair enough ... > please just read on, though. Having acknowledged your thought, don't > you think that, in fairness, I deserve a hearing? I'll be brief. > I called this a racial war. Even the most casual observer now must > acknowledge that what is taking place in the Middle East is a war > fought for Israel and against Muslims. The oil simply is a cynical > excuse. We could have bought every last drop of Arab oil, and for > much less than we are paying for this insanity. > Here's what all our targets have in common: they are the Muslim > enemies of Israel. Muslim, not just Arab. Our next target, the > Iranians, predominantly are Aryan, not Arab, even if mostly Muslim. > Iran ... Aryan. That is no coincidence. One derives directly from > the other. Look it up for yourself. > What you see in the Middle East today is a war between Judaism and > Islam, simply put. Oddly enough, however, it is not a religious war, > but a racial war. > America - Just Another Jewish Nation ... Or Is It? > That's why the Arabs that Americans fight every day refer to Americans > as "Jews," a fact you don't see or hear reported by our by our > controlled media. > Even more oddly, Islam is much closer to Christianity than is Judaism, > the latter of which is nothing more than secular humanism, or self > worship, in the final analysis. Muslims revere Jesus Christ and > acknowledge His special place. Muslims regard their own Mohammed as > only a prophet, though held in very high regard. Again, go look it up > for yourself. You won't believe me, otherwise. > That business flying around the Internet about the Koran being a book > of exclusion and a manual for aggression? About Islam's objective > being the killing of all infidels, with all infidels being > non-Muslims? About Islam being so unforgiving as to require the > mutilation of children for stealing bread? Pure propaganda, false in > every regard, designed to whip up Western support for the racial war > being waged against the followers of Islam. > Jews vs. Everybody Else > A different sort of war is being waged throughout Western > civilization, with countries like Germany, Austria, Britain and Canada > farther along and actually imprisoning those who speak just as I do > today. That is why I dare not visit those countries, even if I never > said a word while within their borders. It, too, is a racial war, > being fought in the classic Jewish way: Brother against brother, > while Jews stand by, wailing loudly about their victimhood, all the > while supplying both sides. This peculiar war ultimately pits Judaism > against Christianity. Again, however, it is not really religious, but > racial. Christianity solidly is in the heritage of Europeans and > European-Americans. Religion is the excuse. Race is the target. > We Love Jesus ... Not! > Just as always, they have us fighting each other, with even America's > Christians now participating in the demise of Christianity. Consider > the abject, written apology offered recently by a Virginia Beach > Catholic school principal because some of his students chanted "We > love Jesus" during a basketball game with a rival Jewish school. Last > I heard, the moron had enrolled all those kids in mandatory > sensitivity training. > Follow the URL in the previous sentence and note well that it is not > reported just what the Jewish students had been chanting. Does it > matter, though? Think about it for a moment. If you are a Christian, > how could you possibly consider any context in which saying "We love > Jesus" requires an apology? Didn't Christians endure death in the > Roman Coliseum for their faith? Isn't this precisely the manner in > which Judas thrice denied Christ? Would somebody out there who knows > the guy please point this out to that school principal for me? > What Does It Mean to be a Christian > Now, I am not particularly religious, I confess, but I am deeply > spiritual. What's more, I do my best to lead my life in accordance > with the very principles enunciated by Jesus Christ. Yes, I know that > true believers need more: they demand that one utter the magic > incantation, "I accept Jesus Christ as my personal Lord and Savior," > or words to that effect. What on earth does that mean? No, it is a > rhetorical question, so please don't send me endless religious tracts, > but please do think about it. > What would Jesus say about one who acts in accordance with His > teachings versus another who merely pays Him lip service? You know > the answer, of course. Some of the finest Christians I know never go > to church. Some of the most clearly un-Christian hypocrites out there > are knee down in pews every Sunday and walk around with Bibles in > their hands at all times. You know who you are. > Christianity is a way of living, not talking ... action, not posture > ... being, not pretending. As I said, this is about culture, about > race and heritage, not religion. It is about what we are and the way > we are at our very core. Our very existence is a constant reminder to > others of what they are not. It may not matter to you, but it > certainly does to Jews, regardless of what you might think. > Are We What We Do, or What We Say? > Here's the punch line: Christian countries do not bomb third-world > countries like Iraq and Afghanistan back into the stone age. Jewish > countries do, though. Just ask any Palestinian. > It was no coincidence that those Lebanese ambulances targeted by > Israeli jets during its recent genocidal campaign against the civilian > population of southern Lebanon (principally Christian Lebanese, by the > way) were holed directly in the center of the red crosses on their > roofs. (Ambulances...carrying injured children, of all things.) > Nor is it coincidental that the international Red Cross now has > agreed, at Israel's insistence, to replace its traditional symbolic > cross with ... well, I'm not sure what to call the symbol on this flag > held by a Red Cross official, nor am I sure that the organization even > will continue to call itself the Red Cross. I am ashamed to admit > that, in the past, I have contributed to this shameless, so-called > charity with its grotesquely overpaid executives. Never again, > however, and don't you do it, either! > Yes, of course the Israeli Jews intentionally blew up those ambulances > with pinpoint guided rockets simply because of the presence of the > crosses on the roofs. Yes, it is far more than coincidence that the > penetration was directly in the center of the cross. Don't be naive. > Do You Believe in Coincidence? > Nor is it coincidence that the nonstop legal assault upon Christianity > in America is being brought by Jewish plaintiffs, through Jewish > lawyers, heard by Jewish judges. It is America's European culture > they are after eradicating, of course, which means our elimination > altogether. It's racial, not religious. Stop and think! Why are the > borders of every Western civilized nation being held wide open to the > third world, after all, quite aside from the profit motive inherent to > killing all American industry by moving it overseas? > I've said it before: America has become Jewish. By culture. It has > crept into our outlook and our attitudes, dispensed largely through > the major institutions firmly in Jewish control: media, entertainment > and government. Of course, American industry also is largely Jewish > controlled, but that, too, simply is another expression of how Jewish > we have become. Think not? Just look at the corporate scavengers > carving up the spoils in the Middle East. > True Blue Jew > The coarse nature of our entertainment, which degrades each year to > levels unthinkable a generation ago, is yet another mark of America's > Jewishness. And Jews themselves proudly point to the pornography > industry's effect upon America: "Jewish involvement in pornography > has a long history in the United States, as Jews have helped transform > a fringe subculture into what has become a primary constituent of > Americana. These are the 'true blue' Jews." (Jewish professor Nathan > Abrams in an article titled, "Triple Exthnics," published inThe Jewish > Quarterly, winter 2004, extensively quoted by David Duke at his > website. > America's greed and sharp dealings internationally, regarding oil and > the supremacy of the US dollar, are singularly Jewish in nature. Oh, > come on - why do you think it is that "Jew" is one of the very few > racial identifiers to come down through history with a whole separate > meaning as a verb? We don't talk of Brit-ing someone or China-ing > others, after all! > America's new-found international aggression and hostility quite > simply is Jewish. No? Then I suppose it merely is coincidence that > America is taking down Israel's enemies in order of their threat > level. Saddam's fate was sealed by the first scud missile heaved into > Tel Aviv during that first Gulf war. Next up, of course: Iran. > I suppose that it really should be no surprise that there is no place > left in America for those of us who dare to criticize her > ever-increasing Jewishness or the bloodthirsty savagery of that other > Jewish country: Israel. Why else do you suppose that the Kennedy > hate-speech bill keeps getting reintroduced into Congress? Eventually > it will pass - probably very soon now and due to the Democrats now in > control on Capitol Hill. That is when my voice will be silenced. > Here Come Da Pain > My prognosis? Pain. Lots and lots of pain. Both economic and > physical. Our very destruction as a people and a nation is the > objective of our Stockholm-Syndrome-like captors. We are doomed. > Even without the coming outright destruction, our cultural conversion > to Judaism almost is complete, anyway. How many generations before > natural selection would ensure that only the most Jewish acting of > those among us would prosper or, even, survive? > Always, Jews overreach, create a backlash and then get tossed aside. > This time will be no different. Already, the reaction is in movement. > Witness my own conversion and newfound mission in life. Before my > awakening, I was as unaware of Jews as most of America until just very > recently. They created me out of whole cloth. 9-11 and Iraq have > been opening many eyes. Israel's outrageous conduct in Lebanon and > Palestine, coupled with the obvious Jewish control of America through > her leadership, opens even more eyes every day. > Salvation or Destruction? Or Both? > But our society's imminent destruction contains the seeds of our hope > and renewal, as well. Only through the utter destruction of American > society can our grandchildren and their children hope to be free of > the cultural Judaism that now has all of us in its grip and thereby > respond to their own inborn genetic imperative, the same as that which > motivated America's founding fathers. That will be their salvation > and that of our culture, our race. > In reality, perhaps utter destruction is the kindest thing that awaits > us, if only for the sake of our descendants. As a race, I am > confident that we will survive. We always have. It's what we do > best. This will be no exception. We who are alive today will not see > it, of course, but it is coming. Of that I am certain. > Meanwhile, we all must do what we can to make a difference. Living my > life by rock-solid principles, raising up strong, alert, morally > strong and mentally healthy children and writing things like this. > That is what I do. We all have a role to play. What is yours? > New America. An idea whose time has come. > My name is Edgar J. Steele. Thanks for listening. Please visit my > web site, www.ConspiracyPenPal.com, for other messages just like this > one. > > http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com > > http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.ihr.org/ > > http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html http://www.nsm88.com/
Topaz
2007-03-28 20:31:54 EST
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:29:50 -0400, Info <info@info.nospam.com> wrote:
> >> by Edgar J. Steele >> "...and I'm glad we killed him!" Thus went one of the more virulent >> of my recent hate mailers, who went on to proclaim the racial >> superiority of his being Jewish. He never said what, in particular, >> set him off, or if, in fact, it was anything I ever had written. His >> intent seemed merely to stun and outrage me. He failed. >> A great many other Jewish haters have echoed this fellow's >> vitriol-laced message by threatening to kill me, my wife and our >> children. (this particularly arrogant Jew actually identified >> himself - he is Mark Wiles, Nevada-based thug for the Jewish Defense >> League). > >Sounds like you have a good federal lawsuit you can file. To stop others >from doing that too, it might take punitive damages in the mutli-million >dollar range, to set an example.
Edgar Steele is a lawyer. I'm sure he knows how fair and just the courts are and doesn't bother trying. Imagine if one from our side threatened a Jew like that. That would be a whole different story.
Topaz wrote: > On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:29:50 -0400, Info <info@info.nospam.com> wrote: > > >>> by Edgar J. Steele >>> "...and I'm glad we killed him!" Thus went one of the more virulent >>> of my recent hate mailers, who went on to proclaim the racial >>> superiority of his being Jewish. He never said what, in particular, >>> set him off, or if, in fact, it was anything I ever had written. His >>> intent seemed merely to stun and outrage me. He failed. >>> A great many other Jewish haters have echoed this fellow's >>> vitriol-laced message by threatening to kill me, my wife and our >>> children. (this particularly arrogant Jew actually identified >>> himself - he is Mark Wiles, Nevada-based thug for the Jewish Defense >>> League). >> Sounds like you have a good federal lawsuit you can file. To stop others >>from doing that too, it might take punitive damages in the mutli-million >> dollar range, to set an example. > > Edgar Steele is a lawyer. I'm sure he knows how fair and just the > courts are and doesn't bother trying. Imagine if one from our side > threatened a Jew like that. That would be a whole different story.
You guys are barking up the wrong tree. Hate crime laws cover when one hurts or threatens to hurt someone because of their race, religion, sexual orientation etc. It does not prohibit people from saying hateful things such a the above about Christianity or bigoted statements against different races like what you guys post all the time.
Topaz
2007-03-30 18:56:59 EST
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:48:09 -0700, Tim Howard <*d@suddenlink.net> wrote:
> >You guys are barking up the wrong tree. Hate crime laws cover when one >hurts or threatens to hurt someone because of their race, religion, >sexual orientation etc. It does not prohibit people from saying hateful >things such a the above about Christianity or bigoted statements against > different races like what you guys post all the time.
The problem with liberals is they think the other liberals who run the government are reasonable people like themselves. They couldn't be more mistaken. The liberals who run the government are Jews. Want proof of how wrong these liberals are? They passed hate crime laws in Canada. Now Canadians preachers are afraid to say homosexual perversion is wrong, for fear of getting arrested.
Topaz wrote: > On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:48:09 -0700, Tim Howard > <tim.howard@suddenlink.net> wrote: > > >> You guys are barking up the wrong tree. Hate crime laws cover when one >> hurts or threatens to hurt someone because of their race, religion, >> sexual orientation etc. It does not prohibit people from saying hateful >> things such a the above about Christianity or bigoted statements against >> different races like what you guys post all the time. > > The problem with liberals is they think the other liberals who run > the government are reasonable people like themselves. They couldn't be > more mistaken. The liberals who run the government are Jews. Want > proof of how wrong these liberals are? They passed hate crime laws in > Canada. Now Canadians preachers are afraid to say homosexual > perversion is wrong, for fear of getting arrested. > Just to clarify, here is a summary from a Canadian website about this hate crime law. I do not favor putting people in jail just for saying bigoted things, but if those things were likely to cause people to commit violence against people, then I think hate speech laws may be good, if applied in a limited way. And it does not target preachers as you have said.
Status of free speech in Canada:
In the U.S., a person cannot legally yell "fire" in a crowded movie theatre. But they are free to say just about anything else without danger of criminal prosecution. For example, a conservative Christian teleminister in the early 1990s advocated the execution of all Wiccans in the U.S. More recently, a Baptist pastor from Texas advocated that the U.S. army round up Wiccans and burn them alive with napalm. Both clergy were immune from prosecution due to the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment which guarantees almost complete freedom of speech in the country. (We do not wish to overemphasize genocidal advocacy of Wiccans by conservative Christians. However, we are unaware of any other instances in North America where genocide has been actively advocated in recent years.)
Canadians do not have this degree of freedom of speech. Legislation in Canada follows the British tradition, as do laws in Australia and New Zealand and some other former colonies. In particular, citizens are not allowed to incite or promote hatred, advocate genocide or actually commit genocide against certain specified groups.
horizontal rule The Criminal Code of Canada: Hate Propaganda:
Before 2004-APR-29, the "Hate Propaganda" section of the Criminal Code of Canada (Section 318 & 319) prohibited the expression of hatred against -- or the advocacy of genocide of -- four "identifiable groups:" people distinguished by their "color, race, religion or ethnic origin." 1 Curiously enough, sex, disability, and other criteria are not included. Apparently one can deliver a speech that "willfully promotes hatred" -- even one which "advocates or promotes genocide" -- against women or the disabled and enjoy immunity of prosecution under the law. Hatred against persons on the basis of their sexual orientation was not protected either. An individual could promote hatred or even advocate genocide against heterosexuals, bisexuals, or homosexuals with impunity, as long as the speech was directed at persons with a specific sexual orientation. Bill C-250 changed this when it was signed into law.
horizontal rule Who can be convicted under Section 319?
Section 318 deals with genocide. Section 319 deals with hate speech:
1. If it can be shown that the speech was so abusive that it was likely to incite listeners or readers into violent action against an identifiable group, and if the the speech was made in a public place, then a person could be convicted. 2. If the speech promoted hatred against an identifiable group, but was not likely to incite a listener to violence, then a person could still be convicted. However there are many safeguards that could give that person immunity. A person could not be convicted if: bullet The hate speech was expressed during a private conversation. bullet If the person can establish that the statements made are true. bullet If, "in good faith, he expressed or attempted to establish by argument an opinion on a religious subject." This would give clergypersons immunity from conviction for a hate-based sermon, for example. bullet If the statements were relevant to any subject of public interest, and if, on reasonable grounds, the person believed them to be true. This would give additional protection for the clergy. bullet If he described material that might generate feelings of hatred for an identifiable group "for the purpose of removal" of that hatred. bullet If the provincial Attorney General refused to give permission. The Attorney General's consent is required before charges can be laid.. 1
In this section of the Code, the term "statements" includes spoken words, written words, published text, gestures, signs and other visible representations.
The Code permits up to two years in prison for anyone convicted of a hate crime. It permits the government to confiscate any literature that was used in conjunction with the hate speech.
horizontal rule Immunity from prosecution under the Criminal Code:
Two examples: bullet The Hugh Owen's case: Restriction on freedom of religious speech in Canada was emphasized in the Hugh Owens human rights case in Saskatchewan during late 2002. A private citizen had taken out an anti-gay, religiously based advertisement in a local newspaper. 2
The Hugh Owens case was not directly related to the hate propaganda section of the criminal code, or to bill C-250. Even after "sexual orientation" had been added to section 308, he is immune from prosecution under the criminal code because his "speech" was closely tied to a religious statement. The charge was actually laid under a provincial human rights law.
The ad consisted of a simple list of citations of Bible passages -- not including texts -- which religious conservatives commonly quote when attacking equal rights for persons who engage in same-sex behavior. Beside the list was a symbol consisting of two male stick figures holding hands, a diagonal slash, and a red circle indicating prohibition. One of the six passages listed was Leviticus 20:13 which, in most English translations appears to call for the execution by stoning of any sexually active gay male who has engaged in anal intercourse. There is no consensus among theologians as to the exact meaning of the passage. Many religious liberals believe that only those gays who engaged in same-sex anal intercourse during religious rituals in Pagan temples would qualify for execution. The King James Version of the text reads:
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them." (KJV)
"The judge ruled that a Biblical passage in Leviticus 'exposes homosexuals to hatred'," when it was used in conjunction with the symbol.' 3 The ruling was later overturned by Saskatchewan's highest court. More details.
bullet This essay: The above text contains a quotation from a Bible verse that could be considered as inciting hatred against gays -- at least those gays who engage in anal intercourse. However, the author is probably immune from prosecution, for two reasons: bullet Even though the biblical quotation might inspire a felling of hatred towards sexually active gays, the author "...in good faith,...expressed or attempted to establish by argument an opinion on a religious subject." bullet He described material that might generate feelings of hatred for an identifiable group "for the purpose of removal" of that hatred.
Topaz
2007-03-31 08:53:07 EST
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:04:48 -0700, Tim Howard <*d@suddenlink.net> wrote:
>Just to clarify, here is a summary from a Canadian website about this >hate crime law. I do not favor putting people in jail just for saying >bigoted things, but if those things were likely to cause people to >commit violence against people, then I think hate speech laws may be >good, if applied in a limited way. And it does not target preachers as >you have said.
Then you are against free speech. Finally some honesty.
> >Status of free speech in Canada: > >In the U.S., a person cannot legally yell "fire" in a crowded movie >theatre.
But what if there really is a fire.
Jews do control the media and the government.
Blacks are on average less intelligent than Whites.
And homosexual perverts really are cocksuckers.
> But they are free to say just about anything else without >danger of criminal prosecution. For example, a conservative Christian >teleminister in the early 1990s advocated the execution of all Wiccans >in the U.S. More recently, a Baptist pastor from Texas advocated that >the U.S. army round up Wiccans and burn them alive with napalm. Both >clergy were immune from prosecution due to the U.S. Constitution's First >Amendment which guarantees almost complete freedom of speech in the >country. (We do not wish to overemphasize genocidal advocacy of Wiccans >by conservative Christians. However, we are unaware of any other >instances in North America where genocide has been actively advocated in >recent years.) > >Canadians do not have this degree of freedom of speech. Legislation in >Canada follows the British tradition, as do laws in Australia and New >Zealand and some other former colonies. In particular, citizens are not >allowed to incite or promote hatred,
Topaz wrote: > On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:04:48 -0700, Tim Howard > <tim.howard@suddenlink.net> wrote: > > >> Just to clarify, here is a summary from a Canadian website about this >> hate crime law. I do not favor putting people in jail just for saying >> bigoted things, but if those things were likely to cause people to >> commit violence against people, then I think hate speech laws may be >> good, if applied in a limited way. And it does not target preachers as >> you have said. > > Then you are against free speech. Finally some honesty. > No, I said if one publicly encourages violence against a group or an individual, this is not free speech. Even in America we have laws against inciting riots. I do not support laws that would put someone in jail just because they tell the lie that the holocaust did not happen, for example. I was not supporting every aspect of the Canadian law. As for you neo-nazis and free speech, the only kind you seem to support is speech that you agree with.
>> Status of free speech in Canada: >> >> In the U.S., a person cannot legally yell "fire" in a crowded movie >> theater. > > But what if there really is a fire. > Then they have to show evidence of that. Which in one of the exceptions to the Canadian hate speech law. > >> But they are free to say just about anything else without >> danger of criminal prosecution. For example, a conservative Christian >> teleminister in the early 1990s advocated the execution of all Wiccans >> in the U.S. More recently, a Baptist pastor from Texas advocated that >> the U.S. army round up Wiccans and burn them alive with napalm. Both >> clergy were immune from prosecution due to the U.S. Constitution's First >> Amendment which guarantees almost complete freedom of speech in the >> country. (We do not wish to overemphasize genocidal advocacy of Wiccans >> by conservative Christians. However, we are unaware of any other >> instances in North America where genocide has been actively advocated in >> recent years.) >> >> Canadians do not have this degree of freedom of speech. Legislation in >> Canada follows the British tradition, as do laws in Australia and New >> Zealand and some other former colonies. In particular, citizens are not >> allowed to incite or promote hatred, > > I think we have all seen enough now. > No, you deleted all the exceptions to prosocution under the Canadian law, one of which is that hate speech can be made in a religious context. I was merely addressing your lie that preachers could be put in jail if they say homosexuality is perverted.
Topaz
2007-04-01 10:04:37 EST
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:44:41 -0700, Tim Howard <*d@suddenlink.net> wrote:
> >No, I said if one publicly encourages violence against a group or an >individual, this is not free speech.
For God's sake will you stop you eternal spinning. You liberals are only fooling yourselves no one else. George Washington would have been arrested for thought crimes for wanting to revolt against the British.
> Even in America we have laws >against inciting riots. I do not support laws that would put someone in >jail just because they tell the lie that the holocaust did not happen, >for example. I was not supporting every aspect of the Canadian law. As >for you neo-nazis and free speech, the only kind you seem to support is >speech that you agree with.
There is nothing wrong with the speech laws in the USA now. Liberals want to ban "hate speech". You are one of these liberals. Either you are for leaving the speech laws alone or you are some kind of Communist or whatever.
>> But what if there really is a fire. >> >Then they have to show evidence of that. Which in one of the exceptions >to the Canadian hate speech law.
Topaz wrote: > On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:44:41 -0700, Tim Howard > <tim.howard@suddenlink.net> wrote: > >> No, I said if one publicly encourages violence against a group or an >> individual, this is not free speech. > > For God's sake will you stop you eternal spinning. You liberals are > only fooling yourselves no one else. George Washington would have been > arrested for thought crimes for wanting to revolt against the British. > You are the one getting off topic. I have never heard you advocate violence and murder against non-whites or gays (although you advocate cruel and unusual punishment, as defined by the US Constitution). Why are arguing with me over whether or not people should be encouraging violence? Once on here, when one of your white nationalist buddies was talking about committing violence against the hated Jews, you admonished him not to do things like that because you didn't want him to be put in prison etc.
>> Even in America we have laws >> against inciting riots. I do not support laws that would put someone in >> jail just because they tell the lie that the holocaust did not happen, >> for example. I was not supporting every aspect of the Canadian law. As >> for you neo-nazis and free speech, the only kind you seem to support is >> speech that you agree with. > > There is nothing wrong with the speech laws in the USA now. Liberals > want to ban "hate speech". You are one of these liberals. Either you > are for leaving the speech laws alone or you are some kind of > Communist or whatever. > I am not a Communist, I am a leftist.
As I said speech is one thing, encouraging violence is another. It was wrong for those Christian fanatics that I quoted to say Wiccans should all be rounded up and burned at the stake, like in Medieval times. If someone hearing their words had gone out and killed a Wiccan, then that preacher that made that speech should be punished as an accessary. Back in the 80s, the SPLC successfully sued a KKK organization out of business when they proved in court that a racial killing by 2 individuals would not have happened had they not been encouraged to do so by their KKK org. People can advocate their bigoted beliefs if they want, but they should do it peacefully.
If a Communist organization advocated murdering rich capitalists and big business owners, you would say they should be punished, wouldn't you?