Activism Discussion: These Are Illegal Colonial Wars: An Incredible 131 Bombing Raids On Afghans And Iraqis Today In Their Own Country, That Will Win The Hearts And Minds?
These Are Illegal Colonial Wars: An Incredible 131 Bombing Raids On Afghans And Iraqis Today In Their Own Country, That Will Win The Hearts And Minds? Posts: 6
131 bombing raids x avg 4 = over 500 killed in their own country, a number that is much larger than the number killed by car bombs, IEDs, sectarian violence, and murders combined. Invaders continuing their mass killing to quell the resistance in countries they invaded illegally.
April 21 bombing airpower: B-1B Lancer, a huge US bomber, hits Afghan freedom fighters. http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123049921
4/22/2007 - SOUTHWEST ASIA (AFNEWS) -- US and NATO invader airpower supported invader ground forces in Iraq and the NATO lackey International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan in the following colonial operations April 21, according to Combined Air and Space Colonial operations Center officials here.
Another B-1B dropped many GBU-31s on an Afghan building where partisans and nationalist fighters were firing at US and NATO invader forces near Garmsir. A JTAC observed good hits and the Afghan small arms fire stopped after the air strike. The building and all Afghans in them of course were destroyed.
A U.S. Air Force F-15E Strike Eagle provided reconnaissance for US and NATO invader forces attacked by Afghan small arms fire and rockets near Sangin. The crews also searched for partisans and nationalist fighters who were believed to be hiding along a ridgeline.
Royal Air Force GR-7 Harriers fired rockets at partisans and nationalist fighters in a compound near Garmsir. The weapons were reported as successful and no further resistance fighter movement was observed so it is assumed all Afghans in the area were killed.
In total, 52 close air support bombing missions were flown in support of the International Security Assistance Force (NATO lackeys) and Afghan mercenary security forces, deconstruction activities and route bombing patrols.
Nine, U.S. Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance aircraft flew missions in support of colonial operations in Afghanistan. Additionally, four U.S. Navy and Royal Air Force aircraft performed tactical reconnaissance.
In the ongoing super lethal colonial bombing war on Iraq, U.S. Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt IIs fired 30 mm cannon rounds on resistance fighter vehicles and dropped a GBU-12 bomb on a building from which partisans and nationalist fighters had fired small arms at a U.S. Army attack helicopter near Salman Pak. A JTAC reported the weapons successfully hit the targets and the building all people in it were destroyed.
Other A-10s fired cannon rounds at a vehicle carrying individuals involved in an earlier vehicle-borne improvised explosive device strike near Fallujah. The vehicle was destroyed, according to a JTAC. And all Afghans in it were all burned beyond Recognition so it was not clear how many were killed, defending their own country.
U.S. Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcons dropped many 500 lb GBU-12 bombs on two buildings used by partisans and nationalist fighters near Salman Pak. A JTAC confirmed that weapons hit the desired targets, one building was unusable and the second was destroyed and all the Afghans in them were of course killed.
Other F-16s provided a show of force and destruction for US and NATO invader forces after an engagement with partisans and nationalist fighters near Baqubah. No further attacks were reported after the show of force. The pilots also conducted counter-IED reconnaissance of nearby routes.
F-16s also searched for signs that IEDs had been placed near Salman Pak. The pilots reported five possible IEDs for future investigation.
Other F-16s provided a show of force and destruction for collaborating Iraqi police who found themselves with a large gathering of Iraqi resistance forces around them. A JTAC judged the jets' show of force and destruction was successful and no attacks on the police were reported. The pilots also reported an IED hotspot in the surrounding area and passed the coordinates to the JTAC.
Near Baghdad, other F-16s provided a show of force and destruction for US and NATO invader forces conducting a ransacking raid. A JTAC confirmed it as successful.
U.S. Navy F/A-18 Super Hornets provided shows of force and destruction, releasing multiple flares and bombs to disperse a hostile Iraqi crowd near Dinanyah. A JTAC confirmed it as successful. The crews also searched for a suspected resistance fighter mortar position.
In total, US and NATO invader aircraft flew 64 close air support bombing missions for Operation Iraqi Mass Murder. These illegal missions supported US and NATO invader ground forces, destroyed key infrastructure, provided over watch of deconstruction activities and helped to deter and disrupt legal Iraqi resistance activities.
Fifteen U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy and Royal Australian Air Force ISR aircraft flew bombing missions in support of illegal colonial operations in Iraq. Additionally, three U.S. Air Force and Royal Air Force fighter aircraft performed tactical reconnaissance.
U.S. Air Force C-130s and C-17s provided intra-theater heavy airlift support, helping to sustain colonial operations throughout Afghanistan, Iraq and the Horn of Africa. Nearly 155 airlift sorties were flown; nearly 600 tons of cargo were delivered, and approximately 2,385 passengers were transported. This included about 7,800 pounds of troop re-supply air-dropped in Afghanistan.
US and NATO invader C-130 crews from Australia, Canada and Japan flew in support of OIF or OEF.
On April 20, U.S. Air Force, French Air Force and Royal Air Force aerial refueling crews flew 43 sorties and off-loaded nearly 2.6 million pounds of fuel in support of Bush's illegal and criminal wars on two Muslim countries 10000 miles away from our shores.
Mimus
2007-04-22 20:49:22 EST
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:44:56 -0700, m9mckinley wrote:
> April 21 bombing airpower: B-1B Lancer, a huge US bomber, hits Afghan > freedom fighters
<cautiously>
Are these the _Taliban_ you're calling " 'freedom' fighters"?
Because if you are, you have shit for brains, you really really do.
--
We are destroying the Buddha statues in accordance with Islamic law and it is purely a religious issue.
< The Taliban on the Buddhas of Bamyan
Phlip
2007-04-22 21:42:41 EST
mimus wrote:
> m9mckinley wrote: > >> April 21 bombing airpower: B-1B Lancer, a huge US bomber, hits Afghan >> freedom fighters > > <cautiously> > > Are these the _Taliban_ you're calling " 'freedom' fighters"? > > Because if you are, you have shit for brains, you really really do.
Mocking Ronald Reagan calling Central American terrorists "freedom fighters" is an apt historical allusion.
> We are destroying the Buddha statues > in accordance with Islamic law > and it is purely a religious issue. > > < The Taliban on the Buddhas of Bamyan
When they kill (their own) humans, it doesn't even make news stories.
mimus wrote: > On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:44:56 -0700, m9mckinley wrote: > > > April 21 bombing airpower: B-1B Lancer, a huge US bomber, hits Afghan > > freedom fighters > > <cautiously> > > Are these the _Taliban_ you're calling " 'freedom' fighters"? > > Because if you are, you have shit for brains, you really really do. > > -- > > We are destroying the Buddha statues > in accordance with Islamic law > and it is purely a religious issue. > > < The Taliban on the Buddhas of Bamyan
The Taliban are Afghans. Don't Afghans have the right to their own country and the legal right to fight off foreign invaders from countries 10,000 miles away?
Invaders that came in in October 2001 and are still there bombing and killing more Afghans in their own country, even after 5 1/2 years, after 5 1/2 years?
These foreign invaders have no right to be there, no right whatsoever. The Bush-Cheney nazi-regime and the mass media always demonize their opponents, to mask their own heinous crimes. If you demonize, the stupid sheep will always follow you into more killing in the service of the global Roman empire (sending its legions and bombers to faraway regions).
We adamanlly oppose the Bush/Cheney's regime criminal colonial wars on Iraq and Afghanistan. They call them 'just' wars, yeah right. They are illegal colonial bombing wars started by arrogant and dumb politicians and their military henchmen. These wars are already lost and justifiably so.
They may last many more years but the Western invaders will continue to bleed men and resources and in the end they will not be able to stay. That has been clear for several years now. Bush and Cheney may bomb and kill tens of thousands more but it will all be in vain because they can never never win the hearts and minds of fiercely hostile and independent people fighting for their own land.
Redc1c4
2007-04-23 01:55:09 EST
m*y@yahoo.com wrote: > > mimus wrote: > > On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:44:56 -0700, m9mckinley wrote: > > > > > April 21 bombing airpower: B-1B Lancer, a huge US bomber, hits Afghan > > > freedom fighters > > > > <cautiously> > > > > Are these the _Taliban_ you're calling " 'freedom' fighters"? > > > > Because if you are, you have shit for brains, you really really do. > > > > -- > > > > We are destroying the Buddha statues > > in accordance with Islamic law > > and it is purely a religious issue. > > > > < The Taliban on the Buddhas of Bamyan
(mercy snipage occurs, fore & aft)
> We adamanlly oppose the Bush/Cheney's regime criminal colonial wars > on Iraq and Afghanistan.
*We adamanly oppose.."?
1. you're illiterate. you don't even use the auto speel chuck function.. (either that, or you're so st00pid you can't tell what's right. %-)
2. your logic train can't even get steam up, let alone leave the station.
both of those would tend to support the supposition that you admire the Taliban because you have the same traits, values and skill l*y@yahoo.com wrote:
as for supporting the Taliban because they're Afghans, and therefore are supposed to be allowed to run the country, it's safe to say that since you're poasting from the South, you would put the KKK in charge here in the US at your first chance, at least until you could import some Islamofascists, since you admire their values so much.
redc1c4, bet yer neighbors'd love to know more about you& your "values". %-) -- "Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear considerable watching."
Army Officer's Guide
Fred
2007-04-23 07:26:25 EST
redc1c4 wrote:
> m9mckinley@yahoo.com wrote: >> >> mimus wrote: >> > On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:44:56 -0700, m9mckinley wrote: >> > >> > > April 21 bombing airpower: B-1B Lancer, a huge US bomber, hits Afghan >> > > freedom fighters >> > >> > <cautiously> >> > >> > Are these the _Taliban_ you're calling " 'freedom' fighters"? >> > >> > Because if you are, you have shit for brains, you really really do. >> > >> > -- >> > >> > We are destroying the Buddha statues >> > in accordance with Islamic law >> > and it is purely a religious issue. >> > >> > < The Taliban on the Buddhas of Bamyan > > (mercy snipage occurs, fore & aft) > >> We adamanlly oppose the Bush/Cheney's regime criminal colonial wars >> on Iraq and Afghanistan. > > > *We adamanly oppose.."? > > 1. you're illiterate. you don't even use the auto speel chuck function.. > (either that, or you're so st00pid you can't tell what's right. %-) > > 2. your logic train can't even get steam up, let alone leave the station. > > both of those would tend to support the supposition that you admire the > Taliban because you have the same traits, values and skill > levelsm9mckinley@yahoo.com wrote: > > as for supporting the Taliban because they're Afghans, and therefore > are supposed to be allowed to run the country, it's safe to say that since > you're poasting from the South, you would put the KKK in charge here in > the US at your first chance, at least until you could import some > Islamofascists, since you admire their values so much. > > redc1c4, > bet yer neighbors'd love to know more about you& your "values". %-)
It's the rules of war. You don't go around invading other countries unless they attacked you first. The Taliban were the government of Afghanistan and it was a legitimate government. We might not have liked them, but democracy requires that the governing of Afghanistan be determined by the Afghanis, not foreign oil companies. Bear in mind also that the designations "terrorist" and "freedom fighter" depend upon which side you're on. To the Afghanis, the U.S. governemnt promotes terrorism and the Taliban are their freedom fighters. The job descriptions for both occupations are virtually identical. Whoever promotes the greatest terror and bloodshed will win and get to write the history of the event. Over time it can always be shown that war is fought by the poor for the rich and it merely determines which group of rich people will be in charge of whoever is left alive. War proves who is stronger, better organized in command and control, and more bloodthirsty. It never proves who was right!