Another Sword of Damocles has just positioned itself over the triple-six-branded necks of the Pentahoaxers. This one clears any doubt about the actual approach of the jetliner, which flew to the north side of the Citgo station and away from the "knocked down" light poles which were located on the south side.
Moreover, one of the eyewitnesses, a Citgo employee, Robert Turcios, states that he saw the jetliner PULL UP as it approached the Pentagon (just before the huge fireball). Mind you, he assumes that the jetliner crashed into the Pentagon, and why wouldn't he, after all, he had just seen a big jetliner flying low and headed right where the explosion occurred. However, the government's own agencies issued an angle of impact (and the exit hole in ring C further confirms this) which clearly places the offending aircraft as coming from the south side of the Citgo gas station and over the light poles. So the Boeing jetliner could *not* have been the one which created the huge fireball that the Citgo employee witnessed. Additionally, the pull up manouevre of the jetliner (which Mr. Turcios explicitly states he witnessed) is quite consistent with a flyover attempt. Going back to Calum's video presentation, 273 feet was the lowest "last-recorded" altitude of the jetliner, radar confirmed. So everything is beginning to fall into place.
We can now additionally conclude the following: the jetliner landed safely elsewhere and the FDR was subsequently secured and tampered with, and precisely because the FDR data after the flyover is missing. Id est, it was removed to hide the fact of flyover.
Knocked down light poles on the south side of Citgo, angle of impact determined by line through impact area and exit hole in Ring C, jetliner flying north side of Citgo and pulling up, 4 credible eyewitnesses, 80+ missing cameras and footage (ostensibly to hide the fact of flyover) ... it's elementary, my dear Watson.
-zookumar-
Vandar
2007-06-25 01:10:28 EST
zookumar yelubandi wrote:
> "http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5296595694237574426" > > Another Sword of Damocles has just positioned itself over the > triple-six-branded necks of the Pentahoaxers. This one clears any doubt > about the actual approach of the jetliner, which flew to the north side > of the Citgo station and away from the "knocked down" light poles which > were located on the south side. > > Moreover, one of the eyewitnesses, a Citgo employee, Robert > Turcios, states that he saw the jetliner PULL UP as it approached the > Pentagon (just before the huge fireball). Mind you, he assumes that the > jetliner crashed into the Pentagon, and why wouldn't he, after all, he > had just seen a big jetliner flying low and headed right where the > explosion occurred. However, the government's own agencies issued an > angle of impact (and the exit hole in ring C further confirms this) > which clearly places the offending aircraft as coming from the south > side of the Citgo gas station and over the light poles. So the Boeing > jetliner could *not* have been the one which created the huge fireball > that the Citgo employee witnessed. Additionally, the pull up manouevre > of the jetliner (which Mr. Turcios explicitly states he witnessed) is > quite consistent with a flyover attempt. Going back to Calum's video > presentation, 273 feet was the lowest "last-recorded" altitude of the > jetliner, radar confirmed. So everything is beginning to fall into > place. > > We can now additionally conclude the following: the jetliner > landed safely elsewhere and the FDR was subsequently secured and > tampered with, and precisely because the FDR data after the flyover is > missing. Id est, it was removed to hide the fact of flyover.
You can also conclude that a giant invisible eggplant from the planet Neptar III is what actually impacted the building.
> Knocked down light poles on the south side of Citgo, angle of > impact determined by line through impact area and exit hole in Ring C, > jetliner flying north side of Citgo and pulling up, 4 credible > eyewitnesses, 80+ missing cameras and footage (ostensibly to hide the > fact of flyover) ... it's elementary, my dear Watson.
It's less than that.
'foolsrushin.'
2007-06-25 02:37:58 EST
On 25 Jun, 06:10, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > zookumar yelubandi wrote: > > "http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5296595694237574426" > > > Another Sword of Damocles has just positioned itself over the > > triple-six-branded necks of the Pentahoaxers. This one clears any doubt > > about the actual approach of the jetliner, which flew to the north side > > of the Citgo station and away from the "knocked down" light poles which > > were located on the south side. > > > Moreover, one of the eyewitnesses, a Citgo employee, Robert > > Turcios, states that he saw the jetliner PULL UP as it approached the > > Pentagon (just before the huge fireball). Mind you, he assumes that the > > jetliner crashed into the Pentagon, and why wouldn't he, after all, he > > had just seen a big jetliner flying low and headed right where the > > explosion occurred. However, the government's own agencies issued an > > angle of impact (and the exit hole in ring C further confirms this) > > which clearly places the offending aircraft as coming from the south > > side of the Citgo gas station and over the light poles. So the Boeing > > jetliner could *not* have been the one which created the huge fireball > > that the Citgo employee witnessed. Additionally, the pull up manouevre > > of the jetliner (which Mr. Turcios explicitly states he witnessed) is > > quite consistent with a flyover attempt. Going back to Calum's video > > presentation, 273 feet was the lowest "last-recorded" altitude of the > > jetliner, radar confirmed. So everything is beginning to fall into > > place. > > > We can now additionally conclude the following: the jetliner > > landed safely elsewhere and the FDR was subsequently secured and > > tampered with, and precisely because the FDR data after the flyover is > > missing. Id est, it was removed to hide the fact of flyover. > > You can also conclude that a giant invisible eggplant from the planet > Neptar III is what actually impacted the building. > > > Knocked down light poles on the south side of Citgo, angle of > > impact determined by line through impact area and exit hole in Ring C, > > jetliner flying north side of Citgo and pulling up, 4 credible > > eyewitnesses, 80+ missing cameras and footage (ostensibly to hide the > > fact of flyover) ... it's elementary, my dear Watson. > > It's less than that. > > - Show quoted text -
Twit: as it happened at the time, Sheriff Rawlings had detained the Eggplant Thing for questioning.
The Thing: I am just on a visit to your planet ... .
Sherriff: Oh yeah, and your favourite tipple is prussic acid ... .
The Thing: Well, I like it but it is not exacly a favourite ... .
Sheriff: You stay right there, boy!
[ Phones Dr. Gripper.]
Dr. Gripper: >From the planet Vandar, he says?
Sheriff: That's what he says, Dr. Gripper.
Dr. Gripper: An obvious loony! Basically what matters is that he is off the streets.
Who pays you guys to make fools of yourselves? -- 'foolsrushin.'
Vandar
2007-06-25 09:13:23 EST
'foolsrushin.' wrote:
> On 25 Jun, 06:10, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>zookumar yelubandi wrote: >> >>>"http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5296595694237574426" >> >>> Another Sword of Damocles has just positioned itself over the >>>triple-six-branded necks of the Pentahoaxers. This one clears any doubt >>>about the actual approach of the jetliner, which flew to the north side >>>of the Citgo station and away from the "knocked down" light poles which >>>were located on the south side. >> >>> Moreover, one of the eyewitnesses, a Citgo employee, Robert >>>Turcios, states that he saw the jetliner PULL UP as it approached the >>>Pentagon (just before the huge fireball). Mind you, he assumes that the >>>jetliner crashed into the Pentagon, and why wouldn't he, after all, he >>>had just seen a big jetliner flying low and headed right where the >>>explosion occurred. However, the government's own agencies issued an >>>angle of impact (and the exit hole in ring C further confirms this) >>>which clearly places the offending aircraft as coming from the south >>>side of the Citgo gas station and over the light poles. So the Boeing >>>jetliner could *not* have been the one which created the huge fireball >>>that the Citgo employee witnessed. Additionally, the pull up manouevre >>>of the jetliner (which Mr. Turcios explicitly states he witnessed) is >>>quite consistent with a flyover attempt. Going back to Calum's video >>>presentation, 273 feet was the lowest "last-recorded" altitude of the >>>jetliner, radar confirmed. So everything is beginning to fall into >>>place. >> >>> We can now additionally conclude the following: the jetliner >>>landed safely elsewhere and the FDR was subsequently secured and >>>tampered with, and precisely because the FDR data after the flyover is >>>missing. Id est, it was removed to hide the fact of flyover. >> >>You can also conclude that a giant invisible eggplant from the planet >>Neptar III is what actually impacted the building. >> >> >>> Knocked down light poles on the south side of Citgo, angle of >>>impact determined by line through impact area and exit hole in Ring C, >>>jetliner flying north side of Citgo and pulling up, 4 credible >>>eyewitnesses, 80+ missing cameras and footage (ostensibly to hide the >>>fact of flyover) ... it's elementary, my dear Watson. >> >>It's less than that. >> >>- Show quoted text - > > > Twit: as it happened at the time, Sheriff Rawlings had detained the > Eggplant Thing for questioning. > > The Thing: > I am just on a visit to your planet ... . > > Sherriff: > Oh yeah, and your favourite tipple is prussic acid ... . > > The Thing: > Well, I like it but it is not exacly a favourite ... . > > Sheriff: > You stay right there, boy! > > [ Phones Dr. Gripper.] > > Dr. Gripper: >>From the planet Vandar, he says? > > Sheriff: > That's what he says, Dr. Gripper. > > Dr. Gripper: > An obvious loony! Basically what matters is that he is off the > streets. > > ******************************************************************* > > Who pays you guys to make fools of yourselves?
The Dutch government.
Next Generation
2007-06-25 10:34:23 EST
zookumar yelubandi skrev: > "http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5296595694237574426" > > Another Sword of Damocles has just positioned itself over the > triple-six-branded necks of the Pentahoaxers. This one clears any doubt > about the actual approach of the jetliner, which flew to the north side > of the Citgo station and away from the "knocked down" light poles which > were located on the south side. > > Moreover, one of the eyewitnesses, a Citgo employee, Robert > Turcios, states that he saw the jetliner PULL UP as it approached the > Pentagon (just before the huge fireball). Mind you, he assumes that the > jetliner crashed into the Pentagon, and why wouldn't he, after all, he > had just seen a big jetliner flying low and headed right where the > explosion occurred. However, the government's own agencies issued an > angle of impact (and the exit hole in ring C further confirms this) > which clearly places the offending aircraft as coming from the south > side of the Citgo gas station and over the light poles. So the Boeing > jetliner could *not* have been the one which created the huge fireball > that the Citgo employee witnessed. Additionally, the pull up manouevre > of the jetliner (which Mr. Turcios explicitly states he witnessed) is > quite consistent with a flyover attempt. Going back to Calum's video > presentation, 273 feet was the lowest "last-recorded" altitude of the > jetliner, radar confirmed. So everything is beginning to fall into > place. > > We can now additionally conclude the following: the jetliner > landed safely elsewhere and the FDR was subsequently secured and > tampered with, and precisely because the FDR data after the flyover is > missing. Id est, it was removed to hide the fact of flyover. > > Knocked down light poles on the south side of Citgo, angle of > impact determined by line through impact area and exit hole in Ring C, > jetliner flying north side of Citgo and pulling up, 4 credible > eyewitnesses, 80+ missing cameras and footage (ostensibly to hide the > fact of flyover) ... it's elementary, my dear Watson. > > -zookumar- > > I saw this (last) video, and it puts another nail in the neocon-coffin of old lies.
First it was the controlled demolition with Thermate (not Thermite) of the twin towers, causing 3000 deaths.
Then there was the 'pull-down'-order by Silverstein of WTC7, another controlled demolition.
Then there is this, which was either, a) a cruise-missile, or b) a small aircraft, maybe a Lear-jet.
In my opinion, the war-criminals in the White House should be put on trial for:
-War-crimes against Americans, causing several thousand deaths. -Launching an illegal war (war can only be declared by the US Congress as far as I know) on Iraq, causing hundreds of thousand deaths.
And if the US *was* in a war, then the only fitting punishment for war-crimes duirng times of war is the death-penalty. Or maybe they'll retract and say they made their decision(s) in peace-time. It won't be any better, they'll get 3000 lifetimes together, each for every death from the twin towers.
I think there is no need for me to see a documentary of what really happened with flight 93 in Pennsylvania. It was shot down by the US Air force to remove the last evidence, the passengers, who might have told how the plane was taken over. Not by muslims.
http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573
Loogie
2007-06-25 12:39:56 EST
Vandar wrote: > 'foolsrushin.' wrote: > >> On 25 Jun, 06:10, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> zookumar yelubandi wrote: >>> >>>> "http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5296595694237574426" >>> >>>> Another Sword of Damocles has just positioned itself over the >>>> triple-six-branded necks of the Pentahoaxers. This one clears any >>>> doubt >>>> about the actual approach of the jetliner, which flew to the north side >>>> of the Citgo station and away from the "knocked down" light poles which >>>> were located on the south side. >>> >>>> Moreover, one of the eyewitnesses, a Citgo employee, Robert >>>> Turcios, states that he saw the jetliner PULL UP as it approached the >>>> Pentagon (just before the huge fireball). Mind you, he assumes that >>>> the >>>> jetliner crashed into the Pentagon, and why wouldn't he, after all, he >>>> had just seen a big jetliner flying low and headed right where the >>>> explosion occurred. However, the government's own agencies issued an >>>> angle of impact (and the exit hole in ring C further confirms this) >>>> which clearly places the offending aircraft as coming from the south >>>> side of the Citgo gas station and over the light poles. So the Boeing >>>> jetliner could *not* have been the one which created the huge fireball >>>> that the Citgo employee witnessed. Additionally, the pull up manouevre >>>> of the jetliner (which Mr. Turcios explicitly states he witnessed) is >>>> quite consistent with a flyover attempt. Going back to Calum's video >>>> presentation, 273 feet was the lowest "last-recorded" altitude of the >>>> jetliner, radar confirmed. So everything is beginning to fall into >>>> place. >>> >>>> We can now additionally conclude the following: the jetliner >>>> landed safely elsewhere and the FDR was subsequently secured and >>>> tampered with, and precisely because the FDR data after the flyover is >>>> missing. Id est, it was removed to hide the fact of flyover. >>> >>> You can also conclude that a giant invisible eggplant from the planet >>> Neptar III is what actually impacted the building. >>> >>> >>>> Knocked down light poles on the south side of Citgo, angle of >>>> impact determined by line through impact area and exit hole in Ring C, >>>> jetliner flying north side of Citgo and pulling up, 4 credible >>>> eyewitnesses, 80+ missing cameras and footage (ostensibly to hide the >>>> fact of flyover) ... it's elementary, my dear Watson. >>> >>> It's less than that. >>> >>> - Show quoted text - >> >> >> Twit: as it happened at the time, Sheriff Rawlings had detained the >> Eggplant Thing for questioning. >> >> The Thing: >> I am just on a visit to your planet ... . >> >> Sherriff: >> Oh yeah, and your favourite tipple is prussic acid ... . >> >> The Thing: >> Well, I like it but it is not exacly a favourite ... . >> >> Sheriff: >> You stay right there, boy! >> >> [ Phones Dr. Gripper.] >> >> Dr. Gripper: >>> From the planet Vandar, he says? >> >> Sheriff: >> That's what he says, Dr. Gripper. >> >> Dr. Gripper: >> An obvious loony! Basically what matters is that he is off the >> streets. >> >> ******************************************************************* >> >> Who pays you guys to make fools of yourselves? > > The Dutch government. >
In your case they over-spent.
-- Contra-Shill #312
----------------------------------------------------------------- We the Sheeple - http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
The Energy Non-Crisis PART 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbakN7SLdbk PART 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGGjbDjnNzw PART 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q39ic04vhNo PART 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKCyCYz_aHY PART 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TYmSGwAumk PART 6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbwMOvV6ctg PART 7: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5HGHsy3H_0 PART 8: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC61X78-OI0
John Perkins - Confessions of an Economic Hit Man at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjPoeQRewiE
Lies. It's All Lies - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5KSieH4Afc
We Know. We Know - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJpCezIsMpk -----------------------------------------------------------------
John R Rybock
2007-06-25 12:58:01 EST
On Jun 24, 9:59 pm, zookumar yelubandi <zooku...@yahoo.ca> wrote: > "http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5296595694237574426" > > Another Sword of Damocles has just positioned itself over the > triple-six-branded necks of the Pentahoaxers. This one clears any doubt > about the actual approach of the jetliner, which flew to the north side > of the Citgo station and away from the "knocked down" light poles which > were located on the south side. > > Moreover, one of the eyewitnesses, a Citgo employee, Robert > Turcios, states that he saw the jetliner PULL UP as it approached the > Pentagon (just before the huge fireball). Mind you, he assumes that the > jetliner crashed into the Pentagon, and why wouldn't he, after all, he > had just seen a big jetliner flying low and headed right where the > explosion occurred. However, the government's own agencies issued an > angle of impact (and the exit hole in ring C further confirms this) > which clearly places the offending aircraft as coming from the south > side of the Citgo gas station and over the light poles. So the Boeing > jetliner could *not* have been the one which created the huge fireball > that the Citgo employee witnessed. Additionally, the pull up manouevre > of the jetliner (which Mr. Turcios explicitly states he witnessed) is > quite consistent with a flyover attempt. Going back to Calum's video > presentation, 273 feet was the lowest "last-recorded" altitude of the > jetliner, radar confirmed. So everything is beginning to fall into > place. > > We can now additionally conclude the following: the jetliner > landed safely elsewhere and the FDR was subsequently secured and > tampered with, and precisely because the FDR data after the flyover is > missing. Id est, it was removed to hide the fact of flyover. > > Knocked down light poles on the south side of Citgo, angle of > impact determined by line through impact area and exit hole in Ring C, > jetliner flying north side of Citgo and pulling up, 4 credible > eyewitnesses, 80+ missing cameras and footage (ostensibly to hide the > fact of flyover) ... it's elementary, my dear Watson. > > -zookumar-
The citgo witnesses are a new one to me. All I get is references to what they said, nothing direct to actually examine. Could you provide a link to these witnesses?
Secondly, did anyone see the plane miss? Did anyone on the NE side of the Pentagon suddenly see the plane coming over the building? Did it fly below radar to wherever it was eventually heading? And if you were going to go so far to fake it, with so many chances for exposure, why not actually crash the plane in the first place?
CRxx
2007-06-25 13:19:12 EST
"Vandar"
> > Who pays you guys to make fools of yourselves? > > The Dutch government.
They make fools out of themselves regularly. Good point!
Christine!
CRxx
2007-06-25 13:53:51 EST
"John R Rybock"
> Secondly, did anyone see the plane miss? Did anyone on the NE side of > the Pentagon suddenly see the plane coming over the building? Did it > fly below radar to wherever it was eventually heading? And if you were > going to go so far to fake it, with so many chances for exposure, why > not actually crash the plane in the first place?
I was wondering. Were there any witnesses to see the poles go down? Or to see a second thing flying. (A CtbFO)
Christine!
Loogie
2007-06-25 14:19:43 EST
John R Rybock wrote:
> > The citgo witnesses are a new one to me. All I get is references to > what they said, nothing direct to actually examine. Could you provide > a link to these witnesses?
Yeah the Citgo witnesses are an effort by Hugo Chavez to take over the USA. Just ask Harry or Shill #312.
-- Contra-Shill #312
----------------------------------------------------------------- We the Sheeple - http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
The Energy Non-Crisis PART 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbakN7SLdbk PART 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGGjbDjnNzw PART 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q39ic04vhNo PART 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKCyCYz_aHY PART 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TYmSGwAumk PART 6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbwMOvV6ctg PART 7: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5HGHsy3H_0 PART 8: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC61X78-OI0
John Perkins - Confessions of an Economic Hit Man at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjPoeQRewiE
Lies. It's All Lies - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5KSieH4Afc
We Know. We Know - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJpCezIsMpk -----------------------------------------------------------------