I have been meaning to do this for a long time. Maybe I will keep posting Hitlery to distract you. Anything to waste your time to keep you from posting even one of your white nationalist propaganda posts is worth it.
2009-03-02 16:28:57 EST
On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:56:36 -0800, Tim Howard <*email@example.com> wrote:
>Hah! > >I made you look Topaz!
> >I have been meaning to do this for a long time. Maybe I will keep >posting Hitlery to distract you. Anything to waste your time to keep >you from posting even one of your white nationalist propaganda posts is >worth it.
It's never a waste of time to post important information like this:
Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933:
"German women, German men !
It is a happy accident that my first speech since taking charge of the Ministry for Propaganda and People's Enlightenment is to German women. Although I agree with Treitschke that men make history, I do not forget that women raise boys to manhood. You know that the National Socialist movement is the only party that keeps women out of daily politics. This arouses bitter criticism and hostility, all of it very unjustified. We have kept women out of the parliamentary-democratic intrigues of the past fourteen years in Germany not because we do not respect them, but because we respect them too much. We do not see the woman as inferior, rather as having a different mission, a different value, than that of the man. Therefore we believed that the German woman, who more than any other in the world is a woman in the best sense of the word, should use her strength and abilities in other areas than the man.
The woman has always been not only the man's sexual companion, but also his fellow worker. Long ago, she did heavy labor with the man in the field. She moved with him into the cities, entering the offices and factories, doing her share of the work for which she was best suited. She did this with all her abilities, her loyalty, her selfless devotion, her readiness to sacrifice.
The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and bread winning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her talents and abilities. Looking back over the past year's of Germany's decline, we come to the frightening, nearly terrifying conclusion, that the less German men were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness and determination have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the woman.
It may be unpopular to say this to an audience of women, but it must be said, because it is true and because it will help make clear our attitude toward women.
The modern age, with all its vast revolutionary transformations in government, politics, economics and social relations has not left women and their role in public life untouched. Things we thought impossible several years or decades ago are now everyday reality. Some good, noble and commendable things have happened. But also things that are contemptible and humiliating. These revolutionary transformations have largely taken from women their proper tasks. Their eyes were set in directions that were not appropriate for them. The result was a distorted public view of German womanhood that had nothing to do with former ideals.
A fundamental change is necessary. At the risk of sounding reactionary and outdated, let me say this clearly: The first, best, and most suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation's source of strength, the woman is its core and center. The best place for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family, in motherhood. This is her highest mission. That does not mean that those women who are employed or who have no children have no role in the motherhood of the German people. They use their strength, their abilities, their sense of responsibility for the nation, in other ways. We are convinced, however, that the first task of a socially reformed nation must be to again give the woman the possibility to fulfill her real task, her mission in the family and as a mother.
The national revolutionary government is everything but reactionary. It does not want to stop the pace of our rapidly moving age. It has no intention of lagging behind the times. It wants to be the flag bearer and pathfinder of the future. We know the demands of the modern age. But that does not stop us from seeing that every age has its roots in motherhood, that there is nothing of greater importance than the living mother of a family who gives the state children.
German women have been transformed in recent years. They are beginning to see that they are not happier as a result of being given more rights but fewer duties. They now realize that the right to be elected to public office at the expense of the right to life, motherhood and her daily bread is not a good trade.
A characteristic of the modern era is a rapidly declining birthrate in our big cities. In 1900 two million babies were born in Germany. Now the number has fallen to one million. This drastic decline is most evident in the national capital. In the last fourteen years, Berlin's birthrate has become the lowest of any European city. By 1955, without emigration, it will have only about three million inhabitants. The government is determined to halt this decline of the family and the resulting impoverishment of our blood. There must be a fundamental change. The liberal attitude toward the family and the child is responsible for Germany's rapid decline. We today must begin worrying about an aging population. In 1900 there were seven children for each elderly person, today it is only four. If current trends continue, by 1988 the ratio will be 1 : 1. These statistics say it all. They are the best proof that if Germany continues along its current path, it will end in an abyss with breathtaking speed. We can almost determine the decade when Germany collapses because of depopulation.
We are not willing to stand aside and watch the collapse of our national life and the destruction of the blood we have inherited. The national revolutionary government has the duty to rebuilt the nation on its original foundations, to transform the life and work of the woman so that it once again best serves the national good. It intends to eliminate the social inequalities so that once again the life of our people and the future of our people and the immortality of our blood is assured..."
2009-03-03 01:17:43 EST
Topaz wrote: > On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:56:36 -0800, Tim Howard > <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > >> Hah! >> >> I made you look Topaz! > > True > >> I have been meaning to do this for a long time. Maybe I will keep >> posting Hitlery to distract you. Anything to waste your time to keep >> you from posting even one of your white nationalist propaganda posts is >> worth it. > > It's never a waste of time to post important information like this: > > > Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933: Sexist speeches like this are always a waste of time.
You are clueless! Of course you should realize that I don't mean it when I post "Hitlery". You don't realize how silly you are for continuing this thread! I wonder what your IQ is sometimes.
2009-03-03 17:04:46 EST
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:17:43 -0800, Tim Howard <*email@example.com> wrote:
The leftists who rule America are for having a unisex country and for fighting "sexism". This should be replaced by a nation that is for manhood and womenhood. Not only are the sexes different, but the reason we are attracted to the opposite sex is precisely because they are different.
In 1852 Emma Snodgrass was arrested in Boston for wearing pants. Today women are allowed to be policemen and soldiers. Men don't need to be protected by female policemen. We don't have to have the kind of society we have now. The government, and the media, and the schools, may all be leftist enemies, but their ways are so contrary to human nature that it can be changed.
The two main forces that reject the unisex society are religion and nationalism. There certainly wasn't much feminism going on in a Muslim country like Afghanistan. And it is no coincidence that the USA bombed Afghanistan. The USA and its masters the Jews are the enemy and that is the first thing we need to be clear about if we are going to change things. There were also Nationalist countries that were also bombed by the USA and the other leftists. The media will tell us how terrible they say these countries were. We must always remember that the media is the enemy and they are the ones pushing unisex culture on us.
Feminism is something we must always fight against. But a normal man who considers women his enemy must eventually go mad. Feminism may be a major symptom of what is wrong with this country but it is only a symptom. The Jewish control of the media and society is the disease. And feminism is Jewish:
Gloria Steinem was a Jew. Bella Abzug was a Jew. Betty Friedan was a Jew.
"THE JEWISH 100: A Ranking Of the Most Influential Jews Of All Time" By Michael Shaprio
# 56 Betty Friedan (b. 1921)
Born Betty Naomi Goldstein to Harry and Miriam (Horowitz) Goldstein in Peoria, Illinois, educated at Smith College, married in 1947 to Carl Friedan, the mother of three children, divorced in 1969, activist, best-selling author, professor, a founder of the National Organization for Women (NOW), the National Women's Political Caucus, and the First Women's Bank, researcher, journalist, Democrat, clinical psychologist, and grandmother, Betty Friedan was the most influential feminist of the postwar era. Deemed by Marilyn French and others as an "initiator of the 'second wave' of feminism, " Friedan's writings and lectures, including the highly influential books THE FEMININE MYSTIQUE and THE SECOND STAGE, synthesized women's views on what equality meant and how to live and work... When the war against fascism ended two decades later, four million women lost their jobs to returning GIs. Women were again told that their place was in the home. The freedom to work to build up and defend their nation was over. Men would earn the family's bread. What the boys needed was a warm place to come home to every night. Ironically, American soldiers had accepted some of the values toward women (Kinder, Kuche, Kirche - children, kitchen, church) as the Nazis they thought they had defeated...
2009-03-04 02:49:35 EST
Topaz wrote: > The leftists who rule America are for having a unisex country and > for fighting "sexism".
First of all we leftists are not ruling America. If we were you would really not like it here. Second of all, we are not for unisex. We are for freedom and equality. We are for men and women running things together in partnership, whether it is their running their personal relationships, running the nation, or anything in between. > > In 1852 Emma Snodgrass was arrested in Boston for wearing pants. > Today women are allowed to be policemen and soldiers. Men don't need > to be protected by female policemen.
If you were being attacked or threatened, etc. and a female police officer came and saved your sorry ass, you would be thankful.
There certainly > wasn't much feminism going on in a Muslim country like Afghanistan.
No, women were being murdered if they didn't wear burkahs, or tried to get jobs or an education. How can you tell us that women are better off under such a system than under a free nation like in the West?
> Feminism is something we must always fight against. But a normal > man who considers women his enemy must eventually go mad. > You must be talking about yourself because you seem to consider most women in the west to be your enemy. I know they would consider you the enemy. But you seem to consider most men and whites your enemy too, since you call them traitors. You consider Jews your enemy. You say you do not consider other non-whites to be your enemy, but you talk about them like they are. Perhaps you have gone mad.
> Gloria Steinem was a Jew. Bella Abzug was a Jew. Betty Friedan was > a Jew. > > "THE JEWISH 100: A Ranking Of the Most Influential Jews Of All Time" > By Michael Shaprio > > # 56 Betty Friedan (b. 1921) > If Jews have fought for freedom, equality, and social justice since they came to the Western world, then that's all the more reason for me to respect them.
> Born Betty Naomi Goldstein to Harry and Miriam (Horowitz) Goldstein in > Peoria, Illinois, educated at Smith College, married in 1947 to Carl > Friedan, the mother of three children, divorced in 1969, activist, > best-selling author, professor, a founder of the National Organization > for Women (NOW), the National Women's Political Caucus, and the First > Women's Bank, researcher, journalist, Democrat, clinical psychologist, > and grandmother, Betty Friedan was the most influential feminist of > the postwar era. Deemed by Marilyn French and others as an "initiator > of the 'second wave' of feminism, " Friedan's writings and lectures, > including the highly influential books THE FEMININE MYSTIQUE and THE > SECOND STAGE, synthesized women's views on what equality meant and how > to live and work... When the war against fascism ended two decades > later, four million women lost their jobs to returning GIs. Women were > again told that their place was in the home. The freedom to work to > build up and defend their nation was over. Men would earn the family's > bread. What the boys needed was a warm place to come home to every > night. Ironically, American soldiers had accepted some of the values > toward women (Kinder, Kuche, Kirche - children, kitchen, church) as > the Nazis they thought they had defeated...
Sexists like you hate Friedan because she fought against Nazi ideas, as the above mentions. She and other feminists said no to men who tried to take their jobs away and order them back into the home. It must really bother you that one of the reasons the USA defeated your heroes the National Socialists is because of all the hard work American women did on the home front.
2009-03-04 17:50:34 EST
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:49:35 -0800, Tim Howard <*firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >First of all we leftists are not ruling America.
Nonsense. Affirmative action, everything is for women and minorities.
>If we were you would >really not like it here. Second of all, we are not for unisex. We are >for freedom and equality. We are for men and women running things >together in partnership, whether it is their running their personal >relationships, running the nation, or anything in between.
>If you were being attacked or threatened, etc. and a female police >officer came and saved your sorry ass, you would be thankful.
If you had any balls you wouldn't like it.
> >There certainly >> wasn't much feminism going on in a Muslim country like Afghanistan. > >No, women were being murdered if they didn't wear burkahs, or tried to >get jobs or an education. How can you tell us that women are better off >under such a system than under a free nation like in the West?
The "West" is ruled by Jews. Here is the result:
By Rebecca Traister
When you turn on your television this fall, you'll be watching more women kick more ass than you can possibly imagine-physically, economically and sexually. Hard-bodied and smart, rich and aggressive, confident and independent, the chicks who populate the prime-time lineup are being cast in roles that once belonged almost exclusively to men. These broads are cops and lawyers and masters of the business universe. Hollywood doyennes like Kyra Sedgwick, Mary-Louise Parker and Holly Hunter have already found midlife career solace (and good writing) on cable. This year, Julianna Margulies will star as a nasty Nancy Grace knockoff, Angie Harmon as a police lieutenant, Lucy Liu as a publishing executive, and Patricia Heaton as a news anchor; there's a new "Bionic Woman" and a whole show about the world's leading incubator of the future, "The Terminator's" Sarah Connor. The flinty Cagneys, Laceys, Murphys and Buffys of yore aren't the exceptions in the new TV season; they rule.
So what happened to the men? Nothing good, that's for sure. Here, for instance, is what happens when Lucy Liu's character, Mia, on ABC's "Cashmere Mafia," wins a work contest, and big promotion, over her boyfriend and colleague Richard: He breaks up with her, tail between his legs. "I thought I'd win and buy us a place and take care of you," he explains. "And now that it's reversed I just can't see us .. I'm 40 next month. I want someone to come home to. I'm going to want kids, and we're just going in opposite directions." Yup. Welcome to the new world on television, where the women are strong, and the men are cavemen. Literally. ABC's "Cavemen," based on the Geico ad campaign character, is about a trio of Cro-Magnons with low self-esteem and a little hair-growth problem. Small-screen heroes who aren't actually dragging their knuckles behave even worse. In the face of professional and sexual equality between the televised sexes, these fictional guys are cowed, angry and generally emasculated by the successes of their female counterparts.
It can't all be coincidence that this season is coming at the end of a summer in which the biggest movie hits have featured dopey, ill-groomed, irresponsible boys who score beautiful high-achieving women and then have no idea what to do once they land them. That's right, we're in Apatowland, baby, where the idea of a male romantic lead now begins with a water bong and ends with a fart joke..
Among the degradations about to be heaped on television's men? There are guys whose wives cheat on them, whose girlfriends get promoted over them, whose mates make more money than they do; guys who get left out of baby-making, who date women with penises and at least one who gets anally raped by a monkey. Seriously.
It's tough to know where to start in explaining how bad these boys have it, but the monkey rape seems as good a place as any. It takes place in the debut episode of the Farrelly brothers' half-hour comedy "The Rules for Starting Over," which premieres on Fox in spring 2008, about Gator (Craig Bierko), a menschy guy tossed back into the dating market after his wife leaves him for a Cirque de Soleil performer. Gator, who hasn't been on a date since his 20s, is mystified by women, and startled to be invited up to the apartment of an attractive naturalist who shows him tapes of the gorillas she's studied. She informs him that "in the world of primates, the female always initiates," pulling him onto the floor on top of her to demonstrate. That's when the woman's pet baboon takes Gator from behind. Gator's buddies do nickname the monkey "bi-curious George"-the only funny line of the episode-but otherwise are a lamentable bunch. They include a heavily accented Indian doctor, also recently divorced, and so lonely and stupid that he invites an escort to his birthday dinner (at "Thank God It Is Friday's"-think of how hilarious that is in an Indian accent!) and proposes to her. As if getting ditched for a circus acrobat isn't emblematic enough of the clownish powerlessness of modern man, the show's lone female star is dating a short man who works for the Celtics-as the team's bouncy mascot, Lucky the Leprechaun!
At least the guys on "The Secrets of Starting Over" have met women. Geeky schlubs Sheldon and Leonard (Jim Parsons and Johnny Galecki) on CBS' "Big Bang Theory" are socially hobbled physicists whose only sexual activity involves donating to a high-IQ sperm bank, so that woman can get pregnant by them without actually having to touch them! The guys meet a cute neighbor and by the end of the half-hour have had their pants removed by her brawny ex. "It wasn't my first pantsing, and it won't be my last," says a defeated Sheldon. Going pantsless is one of the weirdly repeated themes of the new season, turning up again in ABC's bone-chillingly bad comedy "Carpoolers."
The idea behind "Carpoolers," voiced several times during its pilot, is that daily trips to and from work are the only escape for these four miserable men, who have nothing in common except a barely disguised antipathy for the women in their lives. Aubrey's wife has him by the balls: He waits on her, cooks and cares for the kids while she watches television and takes his money. Laird (Jerry O'Connell), the carpool's founder, has been dumped by his wife, who cheated and left him with nothing but an ass-print on the sliding glass door. Gracen (Fred Goss) is married to Leila (Faith Ford), a woman he seems to care for, but whose real estate "hobby" has recently become lucrative. The pilot revolves around the carpool's suspicion that Leila is making more money than her husband. The decline of masculinity is further embodied by Gracen and Leila's subliterate adult son Marmaduke, who inexplicably prances around the house without trousers and miraculously lands a job at which he, too, will be making more money than his father.
The fury and confusion about shifting gender roles as expressed on "Carpoolers" is scary in its nakedness. At one point, Laird suggests to Gracen that he talk to his wife about how she's spending his money. "My money? Ha ha, no," says Gracen. "All the money I make is our money; it always has been. The money she's making now is her money." Aubrey chimes in, "Well at least you have your money. My wife gets my checks; I don't even know how much I make!" To which Laird says, "My wife and I have it all worked out out. She gets everything. Her lawyer saw to that."
Ha ha ha ha! Later Laird stokes Gracen's fear by explaining that "men go off to war; women shop; if we don't provide for our women, do they really need us?" Part of the horror of this show is how it-and not the specter of the high-earning wife-is actually stripping its heroes of anything resembling self-respect or masculine dignity. Gracen squirms around about Leila's income like a spineless nelly; he curls in a fetal position when he hears how much she has in her account; he can only have sex with her after he realizes it's all been a misunderstanding-of course she's not wealthier than he is! "Carpoolers" does more to impugn the American male than any high-earning spouse could ever do. But if this sitcom is any measure-and god willing it is not-the American female is fucked. There is no mode of femininity that satisfies these guys: The wife who is too successful makes her husband feel unmanly; the wife who doesn't work makes her husband bake; the wife who leaves is a bitch who takes the furniture..
At least the barely sublimated aggression is played for laughs in the sitcoms. When it comes to the dramas, the female triumphs are that much more potent, and the resulting arrested machismo of the men is that much more ... not potent. On ABC's "Women's Murder Club," Angie Harmon is police Lt. Lindsay Boxer-recently promoted over her older male colleague-who solves murders with the support of her best female confidants, a reporter, a medical examiner and a D.A. (brunet, blond, African-American, natch). They're such a successful clique that they even have a wannabe (Asian!) member, who begs to become a part of their club, which she sees as "women teaming up to level the playing field in a man's world."
The only area in which these women show any weakness is their love lives, but it's made clear that that has a lot to do with male discomfort with their power. As Lindsay says about her failed marriage, "Before he left, I kept promising that I would change. That I would put him over the job and that I would be at home more. Eventually he just stopped believing me, and he was right." But even without the husband, she shows no interest in changing. When it's pointed out that Lindsay hasn't had sex in two years, she says defensively, "I'm picky. And busy." Medical examiner Claire (Paula Newsome) has a more successful relationship. When she goes home to cuddle with her husband, we understand him to be a man comfortable with his wife's power as soon as she sits in his lap .. in his wheelchair.
Set on an opposite coast and a professional world apart, ABC's "Cashmere Mafia" strikes amazingly similar notes to "Women's Murder Club." "Mafia" is Darren Starr's attempt to plunder the "Sex and the City" audience, before the mid-season debut of NBC's "Lipstick Jungle," based on a book by the original Carrie, Candace Bushnell. "Mafia" begins with a shot of New York amazons (brunet, blond, red-headed, Asian!) striding down a Gotham street. "This is a story about four friends who were taught from childhood that through hard work and smart choices they could have it all," the efficient voice-over tells us. Zoe (Frances O'Connor) is a Wall Street macher with a great family and stay-at-home- dad husband so devoted that he turns down a play-group mom's offer for strings-free sex. Juliet (Miranda Otto) is a hotel chain executive; Caitlin (Bonnie Somerville) is a marketing executive for a cosmetics company who, according to the intro, "says she lives for work because work never tells her that he's just not that into her." But her imperviousness to men may not be simply attitudinal; she's also a budding lesbian. After her first kiss with a woman, the pilot's soundtrack plays "You Make Me Feel Like a Natural Woman." That's right, boys. Want to know what makes this beautiful woman feel like a woman? A woman! Suck it! Like the Murder Club ladies, these women are utterly self-sufficient professionally, except insomuch as they rely on each other for detailed four-way-phone- call advice..
On "Big Shots," "Cashmere Mafia's" corollary about a bunch of classically red-blooded businessmen, the four friends sit around a swimming pool taking a schvitz like the girls on "Sisters" used to do. "Look at us," says Brody, played by Christopher Titus, as a man so devoted to his wife that he spends the whole episode micromanaging the catering for her birthday party, "We're supposed to be these alpha males, right? But now James' wife is sleeping around on him and Karl can't control his crazy mistress and I'm so whipped that I can't tell my wife that the delivery company can't seem to find her shipment of Napoleans." Duncan (Dylan McDermott) replies flatly, "Men, we're the new women," just before Brody gets a phone call that he answers, "Oh, what fresh hell ... What do you mean the pastry filling won't clear customs?"
"Big Shots" is one of the two-two! -- new dramas so befuddled by gender arrangements that in their pilots, they have their muscular male leads-McDermott on "Big Shots" and William Baldwin on ABC's "Dirty Sexy Money"-engaging in sex with transvestites. What better symbol could there be of the emasculation of television's men and the chicks-with- dicks attitude toward its women? As "Dirty Sexy Money" lead Peter Krause taunts Baldwin's character: "Is she more of a man than you are?"
Yes. She is more of a man than he is. All of television's women are, apparently. You know you're in trouble when Julianna Margulies' tough lawyer character on Fox's "Canterbury's Law," which premieres midseason, walks in on her male junior colleague in the pisser, and when he asks her to leave, she merely turns on the water to hurry things along.
Rather than seeing their opportunities for interaction with women expand, these men have instead curled into fetal positions like Gracen on "Carpoolers." Is it simply impossible for the televised heroes of yesteryear to go gracefully into their new world order? It's understandable and honest to express some befuddlement with shifting expectations. But these are characters whose discomfort makes them unattractive, or silly-looking. They are whipped, flummoxed and helpless without the power to make the calls-in the bedroom or the boardroom. They can't just be normal nice guys who are no longer entirely in control, who do childcare or play a subordinate role at work but who do so in a way that is still sexy, still powerful, instead of in a way that is marked as submissive, beaten down or pansy-assed. Nope, they must be buffoons, caricatures, dopes or just angry, neutered bastards.
It's discomfiting for women, too, to see television's idea of what a feminized man is, since it is a reflection of what television considers feminine to begin with. If these men are "the new women," then what does that say about what they take women for? Do they think we have hissy fits when we discover how much our husbands have in their bank accounts? That we flip out when a man comes on to us? That when we get passed over for promotions we walk out of relationships in defeat? If these are supposed to be girly-men, then the notion of what girly looks like is simply ghastly, an insult not only to the men, but to the women whose habits they are supposedly aping. Little wonder that many of these programs include plotlines in which women and men turn in on their own gender to fulfill their social, professional and sexual needs.
> >You must be talking about yourself because you seem to consider most >women in the west to be your enemy. I know they would consider you the >enemy. But you seem to consider most men and whites your enemy too, >since you call them traitors. You consider Jews your enemy. You say >you do not consider other non-whites to be your enemy, but you talk >about them like they are. Perhaps you have gone mad.
The Jews control your media and your mind. Everything is for women and minorities and you are a traitor.
> >If Jews have fought for freedom, equality, and social justice since they > came to the Western world, then that's all the more reason for me to >respect them.
Jews are a race of leftists. They were behind Communism.
> >Sexists like you hate Friedan because she fought against Nazi ideas, as >the above mentions. She and other feminists said no to men who tried to >take their jobs away and order them back into the home. It must really >bother you that one of the reasons the USA defeated your heroes the >National Socialists is because of all the hard work American women did >on the home front.
2009-03-04 23:21:26 EST
You have proven with your continued defense of the Taliban that you hate women. You would rather see women living under a system where they are murdered for not wearing burkahs or getting an education, than living in a free country.
> The Jews control your media and your mind.
You keep saying that all the time. We can debate about the media, but no one is controlling my mind. Do you mean that literally? You talk like you think the Jew have some kind of supernatural psychic powers. There is no way naturally that a group of people could control another's mind.
Everything is for women > and minorities and you are a traitor. > You posted some nonsense about men who consider women the enemy must eventually go mad. This above statement proves that.
2009-03-05 12:00:02 EST
On Mar 2, 1:28 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:56:36 -0800, Tim Howard > > <tim.how...@suddenlink.net> wrote: > >Hah! > > >I made you look Topaz! > > True > > > > >I have been meaning to do this for a long time. Maybe I will keep > >posting Hitlery to distract you. Anything to waste your time to keep > >you from posting even one of your white nationalist propaganda posts is > >worth it. > > It's never a waste of time to post important information like this: > > Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933: He killed himself and his family.
2009-03-05 16:46:09 EST
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:21:26 -0800, Tim Howard <*email@example.com> wrote:
>You have proven with your continued defense of the Taliban that you hate >women.
You are wrong, the Jews control your media, and you have your head up a Jews aft end.
Assallaamu Alaykum Wa Rahmatullaahi Wa Barakaatuhu wrote:
"Respected Brothers/Sisters in Islam,
The Taliban and Women "The treatment of women in Afghanistan is a subject that the Western Media and Feminists have concentrated their ideological warfare efforts on. They have based their 'reports' and analyses on a number of interviews with Communist women, whose idea of 'freedom' is similar to the freedom given to women in the West, i.e...."
"Women's Life Conditions Presently and Under Rabbani Regime The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan is fully committed to the social, cultural and economic development of women. The government has been able to protect the honor, life and property of Afghan women. Contrary to the situation under the Rabbani regime, women can now be outside their houses safely without the fear of being kidnapped, raped or looted. They no longer fear conditions that were common during the Rabbani regime.
According to amnesty international reports of 1992-95, women in Afghanistan bore the brunt of the atrocities by the Rabbani regime and other armed factions. Irresponsible commanders and gunmen not only violated the honor of women by raping them but mutilated women's bodies and in many cases, cut their breasts etc. Similarly, common was murder, torture and execution of our people by the armed factions. Due to the intolerable atrocities, the Taleban Islamic Movement emerged to deliver the defenseless Afghan people from the cruel hands of the warlords. One should ask oneself, is women's freedom to be raped with their breasts cut, or is it to freely live their lives without fear of even comments being made at them.
The former regime that did not serve the country had employed women in a number of sectors without any real need. Some of them were used just for the sexual entertainment of the bureaucracy. Due to the ineffective and immoral institutions, they have temporarily been relieved of their duties. The government pays them their salaries regularly. But women whose work is really needed, are still working in the health, education and security sectors. As conditions in the country improve, so will, doubtlessly, job opportunities for women. Restoration of Women's Safety, Dignity and Freedom Being highly concerned about the well-being of its female citizens, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, soon introduced measures to put a stop to the miserable living conditions under which the women lived in Kabul. After the communists took over in Kabul, they began to exploit women for the purpose of advancing their political and social agendas. In spite of war condition in the country and with no work in the offices, the communist regime forced a large number of women to attend government offices only for their amusement. The Islamic Emirate decided to pay the salaries of these women at their homes, so that they could stay home and take care of their families and children. The purpose of this policy is to help revive the Afghan family and household, as the foundation of the Afghan society, a foundation that was intentionally destroyed by the communist regime... "
> You would rather see women living under a system where they are >murdered for not wearing burkahs or getting an education, than living in >a free country.
Your country is ruled by the Jews, the most evil race on earth.
>You keep saying that all the time. We can debate about the media, but >no one is controlling my mind. Do you mean that literally?
> You talk >like you think the Jew have some kind of supernatural psychic powers.
No, they just control your TV, movies, schools, etc.
>There is no way naturally that a group of people could control another's >mind. >
>You posted some nonsense about men who consider women the enemy must >eventually go mad. This above statement proves that.
Feminism: A Jewish Adversary Movement Against Gentile Culture. Here is a list of some of the Jewish founders and leaders of the modern feminist revolution. Keep in mind that this list is by no means complete-these women are simply the more well-known within the feminist movement; thousands of lesser-known Jewish women lead local and obscure feminist groups
-Gloria Steinem (1934- ); founder, Ms. Magazine.
-Bella Abzug (1920-1998); Civil rights and labor attorney elected to Congress (House of Rep.) from New York City; served 1971-1977.
-Betty Friedan (1921- ); feminist leader and author of the book "The Feminine Mystique" (1963).
-Shulamith Firestone (1945- ); Canadian feminist. Wrote "The Dialectic of Sex" (1970).
-Andrea Dworkin (1946- ); radical; apparent lesbian. Author of the book "Intercourse" (1987).
-Susan Brownmiller (1935- ); U.S. feminist. Wrote the book "Against Our Will" (1975).
-Susan Faludi (1959- ); author of the book "Backlash" (1992).
-Naomi Wolf (1962- ); advisor to Al Gore in the 2000 U.S. presidential election.
-Emma Goldman (1869-1940); early U.S. feminist.
-Ernestine Rose (1810-1892); b. in Poland; early feminist.
-Phyllis Chesler (1941- ); U.S. feminist; author of the book "Woman's Inhumanity to Woman" (2002).
-Judy Chicago (Cohen) (1939- ); U.S. feminist. Author of the book "The Dinner Party" (1996).
-Robin Morgan (1941- ); U.S. feminist. Former editor-in-chief, Ms. magazine.
-Letty Cottin Pogrebin (1939- ); U.S. feminist; co-founded Ms. magazine.
-Gerda Lerner (1920- ); b. in Austria.
-Annie Nathan Meyer (1867-1951); U.S. feminist.
-Maud Nathan (1862-1946); sister of Annie Nathan Meyer; U.S. feminist.
-Geri Palast (1950- ); chair, Committee on Women in the Global Economy; U.S. feminist.
-Rose Schneiderman (1882-1972); b. in Poland.
-Anita Pollitzer (1894-1975); U.S. feminist; pal of artist Georgia O'Keeffe.
-Gene Boyer (no birthyear available); a founder of N.O.W.; president of Jewish Feminists; U.S. feminist.
-Lucy Komisar (1942- ); author of the book "The New Feminism" (1971); U.S. feminist.
-Karen Nussbaum (1950- ); (apparently Jewish); leader of 9to5-National Association of Working Women.
-Eleanor Flexner (1908-1995); (apparently Jewish); U.S. feminist.
-Riane Eisler (1931- ); b. Vienna; author/feminist; (apparently Jewish-fled Nazis). Author of the book "The Chalice and the Blade" (1987).
2009-03-05 16:47:39 EST
German leaders believed in death before dishonor. They knew the allies were subhuman monsters:
The Diaries of Charles A. Lindbergh, p.986
"That young girl riding on her bicycle - she must know that on the day the Russians come she will probably be raped by a dozen soldiers. When do they come? In days? In weeks? That, we have not told the Germans. She has a good face - nicely dressed in old but clean and brightly colored garments - like the daughter of a middle class American family. I realize that we Americans are holding her at Dessau. She cannot flee to safety. We will not let her pass our sentries on the roads. We are turning her and thousands of others like her over to the Soviet soldiers for their sport. I feel ashamed."
p.961 "German children look in through the window. We have more food than we need, but regulations prevent giving it to them. It is difficult to look at them. I feel ashamed of myself, of my people, as I eat and watch those children. They are not to blame for the war. They are hungry children. What right have we to stuff ourselves while they look on - well-fed men eating, leaving unwanted food on plates, while hungry children look on."
Berlin Correspondent, The Times, September 10th, 1945
"...Another small boy turned out of Danzig had a scrawled postcard attached to him stating that his soldier father was long since missing and that his mother and two sisters had died of hunger."
At this time, Denmark, formerly occupied by the Germans as a means of denying the allies a North Sea bridgehead was bursting at the seams with surplus food and was pleading with the allies to put it to good use. It was refused.