Activism Discussion: Hitlery Clinton Now On Her Way To The Middle East.

Hitlery Clinton Now On Her Way To The Middle East.
Posts: 19

Report Abuse

Use this form to report abuse or request takedown.
The requests are usually processed within 48 hours.

Page: 1 2   Next  (First | Last)

Tim Howard
2009-03-01 14:56:36 EST
Hah!

I made you look Topaz!

I have been meaning to do this for a long time. Maybe I will keep
posting Hitlery to distract you. Anything to waste your time to keep
you from posting even one of your white nationalist propaganda posts is
worth it.

Topaz
2009-03-02 16:28:57 EST
On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:56:36 -0800, Tim Howard
<*d@suddenlink.net> wrote:

>Hah!
>
>I made you look Topaz!

True

>
>I have been meaning to do this for a long time. Maybe I will keep
>posting Hitlery to distract you. Anything to waste your time to keep
>you from posting even one of your white nationalist propaganda posts is
>worth it.

It's never a waste of time to post important information like this:


Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933:

"German women, German men !

It is a happy accident that my first speech since taking charge of the
Ministry for Propaganda and People's Enlightenment is to German women.
Although I agree with Treitschke that men make history, I do not
forget that women raise boys to manhood. You know that the National
Socialist movement is the only party that keeps women out of daily
politics. This arouses bitter criticism and hostility, all of it very
unjustified. We have kept women out of the parliamentary-democratic
intrigues of the past fourteen years in Germany not because we do not
respect them, but because we respect them too much. We do not see the
woman as inferior, rather as having a different mission, a different
value, than that of the man. Therefore we believed that the German
woman, who more than any other in the world is a woman in the best
sense of the word, should use her strength and abilities in other
areas than the man.

The woman has always been not only the man's sexual companion, but
also his fellow worker. Long ago, she did heavy labor with the man in
the field. She moved with him into the cities, entering the offices
and factories, doing her share of the work for which she was best
suited. She did this with all her abilities, her loyalty, her selfless
devotion, her readiness to sacrifice.

The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the
past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea
of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and bread
winning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the
man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is
not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her
talents and abilities.
Looking back over the past year's of Germany's decline, we come to the
frightening, nearly terrifying conclusion, that the less German men
were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to
the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men
always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all
great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness and determination
have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually
loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the
woman.

It may be unpopular to say this to an audience of women, but it must
be said, because it is true and because it will help make clear our
attitude toward women.

The modern age, with all its vast revolutionary transformations in
government, politics, economics and social relations has not left
women and their role in public life untouched. Things we thought
impossible several years or decades ago are now everyday reality. Some
good, noble and commendable things have happened. But also things that
are contemptible and humiliating. These revolutionary transformations
have largely taken from women their proper tasks. Their eyes were set
in directions that were not appropriate for them. The result was a
distorted public view of German womanhood that had nothing to do with
former ideals.

A fundamental change is necessary. At the risk of sounding reactionary
and outdated, let me say this clearly: The first, best, and most
suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious
duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can
continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of
the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the
builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation's
source of strength, the woman is its core and center. The best place
for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family,
in motherhood. This is her highest mission. That does not mean that
those women who are employed or who have no children have no role in
the motherhood of the German people. They use their strength, their
abilities, their sense of responsibility for the nation, in other
ways. We are convinced, however, that the first task of a socially
reformed nation must be to again give the woman the possibility to
fulfill her real task, her mission in the family and as a mother.

The national revolutionary government is everything but reactionary.
It does not want to stop the pace of our rapidly moving age. It has no
intention of lagging behind the times. It wants to be the flag bearer
and pathfinder of the future. We know the demands of the modern age.
But that does not stop us from seeing that every age has its roots in
motherhood, that there is nothing of greater importance than the
living mother of a family who gives the state children.

German women have been transformed in recent years. They are beginning
to see that they are not happier as a result of being given more
rights but fewer duties. They now realize that the right to be elected
to public office at the expense of the right to life, motherhood and
her daily bread is not a good trade.

A characteristic of the modern era is a rapidly declining birthrate in
our big cities. In 1900 two million babies were born in Germany. Now
the number has fallen to one million. This drastic decline is most
evident in the national capital. In the last fourteen years, Berlin's
birthrate has become the lowest of any European city. By 1955, without
emigration, it will have only about three million inhabitants. The
government is determined to halt this decline of the family and the
resulting impoverishment of our blood. There must be a fundamental
change. The liberal attitude toward the family and the child is
responsible for Germany's rapid decline. We today must begin worrying
about an aging population. In 1900 there were seven children for each
elderly person, today it is only four. If current trends continue, by
1988 the ratio will be 1 : 1. These statistics say it all. They are
the best proof that if Germany continues along its current path, it
will end in an abyss with breathtaking speed. We can almost determine
the decade when Germany collapses because of depopulation.

We are not willing to stand aside and watch the collapse of our
national life and the destruction of the blood we have inherited. The
national revolutionary government has the duty to rebuilt the nation
on its original foundations, to transform the life and work of the
woman so that it once again best serves the national good. It intends
to eliminate the social inequalities so that once again the life of
our people and the future of our people and the immortality of our
blood is assured..."


http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/

http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org

http://heretical.com/

Tim Howard
2009-03-03 01:17:43 EST
Topaz wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:56:36 -0800, Tim Howard
> <tim.howard@suddenlink.net> wrote:
>
>> Hah!
>>
>> I made you look Topaz!
>
> True
>
>> I have been meaning to do this for a long time. Maybe I will keep
>> posting Hitlery to distract you. Anything to waste your time to keep
>> you from posting even one of your white nationalist propaganda posts is
>> worth it.
>
> It's never a waste of time to post important information like this:
>
>
> Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933:
Sexist speeches like this are always a waste of time.

You are clueless! Of course you should realize that I don't mean it
when I post "Hitlery". You don't realize how silly you are for
continuing this thread! I wonder what your IQ is sometimes.

Topaz
2009-03-03 17:04:46 EST
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:17:43 -0800, Tim Howard
<*d@suddenlink.net> wrote:


The leftists who rule America are for having a unisex country and
for fighting "sexism". This should be replaced by a nation that is for
manhood and womenhood. Not only are the sexes different, but the
reason we are attracted to the opposite sex is precisely because they
are different.

In 1852 Emma Snodgrass was arrested in Boston for wearing pants.
Today women are allowed to be policemen and soldiers. Men don't need
to be protected by female policemen.
We don't have to have the kind of society we have now. The
government, and the media, and the schools, may all be leftist
enemies, but their ways are so contrary to human nature that it can be
changed.

The two main forces that reject the unisex society are religion
and nationalism. There certainly
wasn't much feminism going on in a Muslim country like Afghanistan.
And it is no coincidence that the USA bombed Afghanistan. The USA and
its masters the Jews are the enemy and that is the first thing we need
to be clear about if we are going to change things. There were also
Nationalist countries that were also bombed by the USA and the other
leftists. The media will tell us how terrible they say these countries
were. We must always remember that the media is the enemy and they are
the ones pushing unisex culture on us.

Feminism is something we must always fight against. But a normal
man who considers women his enemy must eventually go mad. Feminism may
be a major symptom of what is wrong with this country but it is only a
symptom. The Jewish control of the media and society is the disease.
And feminism is Jewish:

Gloria Steinem was a Jew. Bella Abzug was a Jew. Betty Friedan was
a Jew.

"THE JEWISH 100: A Ranking Of the Most Influential Jews Of All Time"
By Michael Shaprio

# 56 Betty Friedan (b. 1921)

Born Betty Naomi Goldstein to Harry and Miriam (Horowitz) Goldstein in
Peoria, Illinois, educated at Smith College, married in 1947 to Carl
Friedan, the mother of three children, divorced in 1969, activist,
best-selling author, professor, a founder of the National Organization
for Women (NOW), the National Women's Political Caucus, and the First
Women's Bank, researcher, journalist, Democrat, clinical psychologist,
and grandmother, Betty Friedan was the most influential feminist of
the postwar era. Deemed by Marilyn French and others as an "initiator
of the 'second wave' of feminism, " Friedan's writings and lectures,
including the highly influential books THE FEMININE MYSTIQUE and THE
SECOND STAGE, synthesized women's views on what equality meant and how
to live and work... When the war against fascism ended two decades
later, four million women lost their jobs to returning GIs. Women were
again told that their place was in the home. The freedom to work to
build up and defend their nation was over. Men would earn the family's
bread. What the boys needed was a warm place to come home to every
night. Ironically, American soldiers had accepted some of the values
toward women (Kinder, Kuche, Kirche - children, kitchen, church) as
the Nazis they thought they had defeated...



http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/

http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org

http://heretical.com/

Tim Howard
2009-03-04 02:49:35 EST
Topaz wrote:
> The leftists who rule America are for having a unisex country and
> for fighting "sexism".

First of all we leftists are not ruling America. If we were you would
really not like it here. Second of all, we are not for unisex. We are
for freedom and equality. We are for men and women running things
together in partnership, whether it is their running their personal
relationships, running the nation, or anything in between.
>
> In 1852 Emma Snodgrass was arrested in Boston for wearing pants.
> Today women are allowed to be policemen and soldiers. Men don't need
> to be protected by female policemen.

If you were being attacked or threatened, etc. and a female police
officer came and saved your sorry ass, you would be thankful.

There certainly
> wasn't much feminism going on in a Muslim country like Afghanistan.

No, women were being murdered if they didn't wear burkahs, or tried to
get jobs or an education. How can you tell us that women are better off
under such a system than under a free nation like in the West?

> Feminism is something we must always fight against. But a normal
> man who considers women his enemy must eventually go mad.
>
You must be talking about yourself because you seem to consider most
women in the west to be your enemy. I know they would consider you the
enemy. But you seem to consider most men and whites your enemy too,
since you call them traitors. You consider Jews your enemy. You say
you do not consider other non-whites to be your enemy, but you talk
about them like they are. Perhaps you have gone mad.

> Gloria Steinem was a Jew. Bella Abzug was a Jew. Betty Friedan was
> a Jew.
>
> "THE JEWISH 100: A Ranking Of the Most Influential Jews Of All Time"
> By Michael Shaprio
>
> # 56 Betty Friedan (b. 1921)
>
If Jews have fought for freedom, equality, and social justice since they
came to the Western world, then that's all the more reason for me to
respect them.

> Born Betty Naomi Goldstein to Harry and Miriam (Horowitz) Goldstein in
> Peoria, Illinois, educated at Smith College, married in 1947 to Carl
> Friedan, the mother of three children, divorced in 1969, activist,
> best-selling author, professor, a founder of the National Organization
> for Women (NOW), the National Women's Political Caucus, and the First
> Women's Bank, researcher, journalist, Democrat, clinical psychologist,
> and grandmother, Betty Friedan was the most influential feminist of
> the postwar era. Deemed by Marilyn French and others as an "initiator
> of the 'second wave' of feminism, " Friedan's writings and lectures,
> including the highly influential books THE FEMININE MYSTIQUE and THE
> SECOND STAGE, synthesized women's views on what equality meant and how
> to live and work... When the war against fascism ended two decades
> later, four million women lost their jobs to returning GIs. Women were
> again told that their place was in the home. The freedom to work to
> build up and defend their nation was over. Men would earn the family's
> bread. What the boys needed was a warm place to come home to every
> night. Ironically, American soldiers had accepted some of the values
> toward women (Kinder, Kuche, Kirche - children, kitchen, church) as
> the Nazis they thought they had defeated...

Sexists like you hate Friedan because she fought against Nazi ideas, as
the above mentions. She and other feminists said no to men who tried to
take their jobs away and order them back into the home. It must really
bother you that one of the reasons the USA defeated your heroes the
National Socialists is because of all the hard work American women did
on the home front.

Topaz
2009-03-04 17:50:34 EST
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:49:35 -0800, Tim Howard
<*d@suddenlink.net> wrote:


>
>First of all we leftists are not ruling America.

Nonsense. Affirmative action, everything is for women and minorities.

>If we were you would
>really not like it here. Second of all, we are not for unisex. We are
>for freedom and equality. We are for men and women running things
>together in partnership, whether it is their running their personal
>relationships, running the nation, or anything in between.


>If you were being attacked or threatened, etc. and a female police
>officer came and saved your sorry ass, you would be thankful.

If you had any balls you wouldn't like it.

>
>There certainly
>> wasn't much feminism going on in a Muslim country like Afghanistan.
>
>No, women were being murdered if they didn't wear burkahs, or tried to
>get jobs or an education. How can you tell us that women are better off
>under such a system than under a free nation like in the West?

The "West" is ruled by Jews. Here is the result:


By Rebecca Traister

When you turn on your television this fall, you'll be watching more
women kick more ass than you can possibly imagine-physically,
economically and sexually. Hard-bodied and smart, rich and aggressive,
confident and independent, the chicks who populate the prime-time
lineup are being cast in roles that once belonged almost exclusively
to men. These broads are cops and lawyers and masters of the business
universe. Hollywood doyennes like Kyra Sedgwick, Mary-Louise Parker
and Holly Hunter have already found midlife career solace (and good
writing) on cable. This year, Julianna Margulies will star as a nasty
Nancy Grace knockoff, Angie Harmon as a police lieutenant, Lucy Liu as
a publishing executive, and Patricia Heaton as a news anchor; there's
a new "Bionic Woman" and a whole show about the world's leading
incubator of the future, "The Terminator's" Sarah Connor. The flinty
Cagneys, Laceys, Murphys and Buffys of yore aren't the exceptions in
the new TV season; they rule.

So what happened to the men? Nothing good, that's for sure. Here, for
instance, is what happens when Lucy Liu's character, Mia, on ABC's
"Cashmere Mafia," wins a work contest, and big promotion, over her
boyfriend and colleague Richard: He breaks up with her, tail between
his legs. "I thought I'd win and buy us a place and take care of you,"
he explains. "And now that it's reversed I just can't see us .. I'm 40
next month. I want someone to come home to. I'm going to want kids,
and we're just going in opposite directions." Yup. Welcome to the new
world on television, where the women are strong, and the men are
cavemen. Literally. ABC's "Cavemen," based on the Geico ad campaign
character, is about a trio of Cro-Magnons with low self-esteem and a
little hair-growth problem. Small-screen heroes who aren't actually
dragging their knuckles behave even worse. In the face of professional
and sexual equality between the televised sexes, these fictional guys
are cowed, angry and generally emasculated by the successes of their
female counterparts.

It can't all be coincidence that this season is coming at the end of a
summer in which the biggest movie hits have featured dopey,
ill-groomed, irresponsible boys who score beautiful high-achieving
women and then have no idea what to do once they land them. That's
right, we're in Apatowland, baby, where the idea of a male romantic
lead now begins with a water bong and ends with a fart joke..

Among the degradations about to be heaped on television's men? There
are guys whose wives cheat on them, whose girlfriends get promoted
over them, whose mates make more money than they do; guys who get left
out of baby-making, who date women with penises and at least one who
gets anally raped by a monkey.
Seriously.

It's tough to know where to start in explaining how bad these boys
have it, but the monkey rape seems as good a place as any. It takes
place in the debut episode of the Farrelly brothers' half-hour comedy
"The Rules for Starting Over," which premieres on Fox in spring 2008,
about Gator (Craig Bierko), a menschy guy tossed back into the dating
market after his wife leaves him for a Cirque de Soleil performer.
Gator, who hasn't been on a date since his 20s, is mystified by women,
and startled to be invited up to the apartment of an attractive
naturalist who shows him tapes of the gorillas she's studied. She
informs him that "in the world of primates, the female always
initiates," pulling him onto the floor on top of her to demonstrate.
That's when the woman's pet baboon takes Gator from behind. Gator's
buddies do nickname the monkey "bi-curious George"-the only funny line
of the episode-but otherwise are a lamentable bunch. They include a
heavily accented Indian doctor, also recently divorced, and so lonely
and stupid that he invites an escort to his birthday dinner (at "Thank
God It Is Friday's"-think of how hilarious that is in an Indian
accent!) and proposes to her. As if getting ditched for a circus
acrobat isn't emblematic enough of the clownish powerlessness of
modern man, the show's lone female star is dating a short man who
works for the Celtics-as the team's bouncy mascot, Lucky the
Leprechaun!

At least the guys on "The Secrets of Starting Over" have met women.
Geeky schlubs Sheldon and Leonard (Jim Parsons and Johnny Galecki) on
CBS' "Big Bang Theory" are socially hobbled physicists whose only
sexual activity involves donating to a high-IQ sperm bank, so that
woman can get pregnant by them without actually having to touch them!
The guys meet a cute neighbor and by the end of the half-hour have had
their pants removed by her brawny ex. "It wasn't my first pantsing,
and it won't be my last," says a defeated Sheldon. Going pantsless is
one of the weirdly repeated themes of the new season, turning up again
in ABC's bone-chillingly bad comedy "Carpoolers."

The idea behind "Carpoolers," voiced several times during its pilot,
is that daily trips to and from work are the only escape for these
four miserable men, who have nothing in common except a barely
disguised antipathy for the women in their lives. Aubrey's wife has
him by the balls: He waits on her, cooks and cares for the kids while
she watches television and takes his money. Laird (Jerry O'Connell),
the carpool's founder, has been dumped by his wife, who cheated and
left him with nothing but an ass-print on the sliding glass door.
Gracen (Fred Goss) is married to Leila (Faith Ford), a woman he seems
to care for, but whose real estate "hobby" has recently become
lucrative. The pilot revolves around the carpool's suspicion that
Leila is making more money than her husband. The decline of
masculinity is further embodied by Gracen and Leila's subliterate
adult son Marmaduke, who inexplicably prances around the house without
trousers and miraculously lands a job at which he, too, will be making
more money than his father.

The fury and confusion about shifting gender roles as expressed on
"Carpoolers" is scary in its nakedness. At one point, Laird suggests
to Gracen that he talk to his wife about how she's spending his money.
"My money? Ha ha, no," says Gracen. "All the money I make is our
money; it always has been. The money she's making now is her money."
Aubrey chimes in, "Well at least you have your money. My wife gets my
checks; I don't even know how much I make!" To which Laird says, "My
wife and I have it all worked out out. She gets everything. Her lawyer
saw to that."

Ha ha ha ha!
Later Laird stokes Gracen's fear by explaining that "men go off to
war; women shop; if we don't provide for our women, do they really
need us?" Part of the horror of this show is how it-and not the
specter of the high-earning wife-is actually stripping its heroes of
anything resembling self-respect or masculine dignity. Gracen squirms
around about Leila's income like a spineless nelly; he curls in a
fetal position when he hears how much she has in her account; he can
only have sex with her after he realizes it's all been a
misunderstanding-of course she's not wealthier than he is!
"Carpoolers" does more to impugn the American male than any
high-earning spouse could ever do. But if this sitcom is any
measure-and god willing it is not-the American female is fucked. There
is no mode of femininity that satisfies these guys: The wife who is
too successful makes her husband feel unmanly; the wife who doesn't
work makes her husband bake; the wife who leaves is a bitch who takes
the furniture..

At least the barely sublimated aggression is played for laughs in the
sitcoms. When it comes to the dramas, the female triumphs are that
much more potent, and the resulting arrested machismo of the men is
that much more ... not potent. On ABC's "Women's Murder Club," Angie
Harmon is police Lt. Lindsay Boxer-recently promoted over her older
male colleague-who solves murders with the support of her best female
confidants, a reporter, a medical examiner and a D.A. (brunet, blond,
African-American, natch). They're such a successful clique that they
even have a wannabe (Asian!) member, who begs to become a part of
their club, which she sees as "women teaming up to level the playing
field in a man's world."

The only area in which these women show any weakness is their love
lives, but it's made clear that that has a lot to do with male
discomfort with their power. As Lindsay says about her failed
marriage, "Before he left, I kept promising that I would change. That
I would put him over the job and that I would be at home more.
Eventually he just stopped believing me, and he was right." But even
without the husband, she shows no interest in changing. When it's
pointed out that Lindsay hasn't had sex in two years, she says
defensively, "I'm picky. And busy." Medical examiner Claire (Paula
Newsome) has a more successful relationship. When she goes home to
cuddle with her husband, we understand him to be a man comfortable
with his wife's power as soon as she sits in his lap .. in his
wheelchair.

Set on an opposite coast and a professional world apart, ABC's
"Cashmere Mafia" strikes amazingly similar notes to "Women's Murder
Club." "Mafia" is Darren Starr's attempt to plunder the "Sex and the
City" audience, before the mid-season debut of NBC's "Lipstick
Jungle," based on a book by the original Carrie, Candace Bushnell.
"Mafia" begins with a shot of New York amazons (brunet, blond,
red-headed, Asian!) striding down a Gotham street. "This is a story
about four friends who were taught from childhood that through hard
work and smart choices they could have it all," the efficient
voice-over tells us. Zoe (Frances O'Connor) is a Wall Street macher
with a great family and stay-at-home- dad husband so devoted that he
turns down a play-group mom's offer for strings-free sex. Juliet
(Miranda Otto) is a hotel chain executive; Caitlin (Bonnie Somerville)
is a marketing executive for a cosmetics company who, according to the
intro, "says she lives for work because work never tells her that he's
just not that into her." But her imperviousness to men may not be
simply attitudinal; she's also a budding lesbian. After her first kiss
with a woman, the pilot's soundtrack plays "You Make Me Feel Like a
Natural Woman." That's right, boys. Want to know what makes this
beautiful woman feel like a woman? A woman! Suck it! Like the Murder
Club ladies, these women are utterly self-sufficient professionally,
except insomuch as they rely on each other for detailed
four-way-phone- call advice..

On "Big Shots," "Cashmere Mafia's" corollary about a bunch of
classically red-blooded businessmen, the four friends sit around a
swimming pool taking a schvitz like the girls on "Sisters" used to do.
"Look at us," says Brody, played by Christopher Titus, as a man so
devoted to his wife that he spends the whole episode micromanaging the
catering for her birthday party, "We're supposed to be these alpha
males, right? But now James' wife is sleeping around on him and Karl
can't control his crazy mistress and I'm so whipped that I can't tell
my wife that the delivery company can't seem to find her shipment of
Napoleans." Duncan (Dylan McDermott) replies flatly, "Men, we're the
new women," just before Brody gets a phone call that he answers, "Oh,
what fresh hell ... What do you mean the pastry filling won't clear
customs?"

"Big Shots" is one of the two-two! -- new dramas so befuddled by
gender arrangements that in their pilots, they have their muscular
male leads-McDermott on "Big Shots" and William Baldwin on ABC's
"Dirty Sexy Money"-engaging in sex with transvestites. What better
symbol could there be of the emasculation of television's men and the
chicks-with- dicks attitude toward its women? As "Dirty Sexy Money"
lead Peter Krause taunts Baldwin's character: "Is she more of a man
than you are?"

Yes. She is more of a man than he is. All of television's women are,
apparently. You know you're in trouble when Julianna Margulies' tough
lawyer character on Fox's "Canterbury's Law," which premieres
midseason, walks in on her male junior colleague in the pisser, and
when he asks her to leave, she merely turns on the water to hurry
things along.

Rather than seeing their opportunities for interaction with women
expand, these men have instead curled into fetal positions like Gracen
on "Carpoolers." Is it simply impossible for the televised heroes of
yesteryear to go gracefully into their new world order? It's
understandable and honest to express some befuddlement with shifting
expectations. But these are characters whose discomfort makes them
unattractive, or silly-looking. They are whipped, flummoxed and
helpless without the power to make the calls-in the bedroom or the
boardroom. They can't just be normal nice guys who are no longer
entirely in control, who do childcare or play a subordinate role at
work but who do so in a way that is still sexy, still powerful,
instead of in a way that is marked as submissive, beaten down or
pansy-assed. Nope, they must be buffoons, caricatures, dopes or just
angry, neutered bastards.

It's discomfiting for women, too, to see television's idea of what a
feminized man is, since it is a reflection of what television
considers feminine to begin with. If these men are "the new women,"
then what does that say about what they take women for? Do they think
we have hissy fits when we discover how much our husbands have in
their bank accounts? That we flip out when a man comes on to us? That
when we get passed over for promotions we walk out of relationships in
defeat? If these are supposed to be girly-men, then the notion of what
girly looks like is simply ghastly, an insult not only to the men, but
to the women whose habits they are supposedly aping. Little wonder
that many of these programs include plotlines in which women and men
turn in on their own gender to fulfill their social, professional and
sexual needs.

>
>You must be talking about yourself because you seem to consider most
>women in the west to be your enemy. I know they would consider you the
>enemy. But you seem to consider most men and whites your enemy too,
>since you call them traitors. You consider Jews your enemy. You say
>you do not consider other non-whites to be your enemy, but you talk
>about them like they are. Perhaps you have gone mad.

The Jews control your media and your mind. Everything is for women
and minorities and you are a traitor.

>
>If Jews have fought for freedom, equality, and social justice since they
> came to the Western world, then that's all the more reason for me to
>respect them.

Jews are a race of leftists. They were behind Communism.

>
>Sexists like you hate Friedan because she fought against Nazi ideas, as
>the above mentions. She and other feminists said no to men who tried to
>take their jobs away and order them back into the home. It must really
>bother you that one of the reasons the USA defeated your heroes the
>National Socialists is because of all the hard work American women did
>on the home front.


http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/

http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org

http://heretical.com/

Tim Howard
2009-03-04 23:21:26 EST
You have proven with your continued defense of the Taliban that you hate
women. You would rather see women living under a system where they are
murdered for not wearing burkahs or getting an education, than living in
a free country.

Topaz wrote:

> The Jews control your media and your mind.

You keep saying that all the time. We can debate about the media, but
no one is controlling my mind. Do you mean that literally? You talk
like you think the Jew have some kind of supernatural psychic powers.
There is no way naturally that a group of people could control another's
mind.

Everything is for women
> and minorities and you are a traitor.
>
You posted some nonsense about men who consider women the enemy must
eventually go mad. This above statement proves that.

Michael Ejercito
2009-03-05 12:00:02 EST
On Mar 2, 1:28 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:56:36 -0800, Tim Howard
>
> <tim.how...@suddenlink.net> wrote:
> >Hah!
>
> >I made you look Topaz!
>
>   True
>
>
>
> >I have been meaning to do this for a long time.  Maybe I will keep
> >posting Hitlery to distract you.  Anything to waste your time to keep
> >you from posting even one of your white nationalist propaganda posts is
> >worth it.
>
> It's never a waste of time to post important information like this:
>
>  Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933:
He killed himself and his family.


Michael

Topaz
2009-03-05 16:46:09 EST
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:21:26 -0800, Tim Howard
<*d@suddenlink.net> wrote:

>You have proven with your continued defense of the Taliban that you hate
>women.

You are wrong, the Jews control your media, and you have your head
up a Jews aft end.


Assallaamu Alaykum Wa Rahmatullaahi Wa Barakaatuhu wrote:

"Respected Brothers/Sisters in Islam,

The Taliban and Women
"The treatment of women in Afghanistan is a subject that the Western
Media and Feminists have concentrated their ideological warfare
efforts on. They have based their 'reports' and analyses on a number
of interviews with Communist women, whose idea of 'freedom' is similar
to the freedom given to women in the West, i.e...."

"Women's Life Conditions Presently and Under Rabbani Regime The
Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan is fully committed to the social,
cultural and economic development of women. The government has been
able to protect the honor, life and property of Afghan women. Contrary
to the situation under the Rabbani regime, women can now be outside
their houses safely without the fear of being kidnapped, raped or
looted. They no longer fear conditions that were common during the
Rabbani regime.

According to amnesty international reports of 1992-95, women in
Afghanistan bore the brunt of the atrocities by the Rabbani regime and
other armed factions. Irresponsible commanders and gunmen not only
violated the honor of women by raping them but mutilated women's
bodies and in many cases, cut their breasts etc. Similarly, common was
murder, torture and execution of our people by the armed factions. Due
to the intolerable atrocities, the Taleban Islamic Movement emerged to
deliver the defenseless Afghan people from the cruel hands of the
warlords. One should ask oneself, is women's freedom to be raped with
their breasts cut, or is it to freely live their lives without fear of
even comments being made at them.

The former regime that did not serve the country had employed women
in a number of sectors without any real need. Some of them were used
just for the sexual entertainment of the bureaucracy. Due to the
ineffective and immoral institutions, they have temporarily been
relieved of their duties. The government pays them their salaries
regularly. But women whose work is really needed, are still working in
the health, education and security sectors. As conditions in the
country improve, so will, doubtlessly, job opportunities for women.
Restoration of Women's Safety, Dignity and Freedom
Being highly concerned about the well-being of its female citizens,
the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, soon introduced measures to put a
stop to the miserable living conditions under which the women lived in
Kabul. After the communists took over in Kabul, they began to exploit
women for the purpose of advancing their political and social agendas.
In spite of war condition in the country and with no work in the
offices, the communist regime forced a large number of women to attend
government offices only for their amusement. The Islamic Emirate
decided to pay the salaries of these women at their homes, so that
they could stay home and take care of their families and children. The
purpose of this policy is to help revive the Afghan family and
household, as the foundation of the Afghan society, a foundation that
was intentionally destroyed by the communist regime... "


> You would rather see women living under a system where they are
>murdered for not wearing burkahs or getting an education, than living in
>a free country.

Your country is ruled by the Jews, the most evil race on earth.


>You keep saying that all the time. We can debate about the media, but
>no one is controlling my mind. Do you mean that literally?

Yes

> You talk
>like you think the Jew have some kind of supernatural psychic powers.

No, they just control your TV, movies, schools, etc.


>There is no way naturally that a group of people could control another's
>mind.
>

>You posted some nonsense about men who consider women the enemy must
>eventually go mad. This above statement proves that.

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

Feminism: A Jewish Adversary Movement Against Gentile Culture.
Here is a list of some of the Jewish founders and leaders of the
modern feminist revolution. Keep in mind that this list is by no means
complete-these women are simply the more well-known within the
feminist movement; thousands of lesser-known Jewish women lead local
and obscure feminist groups

-Gloria Steinem (1934- ); founder, Ms. Magazine.

-Bella Abzug (1920-1998); Civil rights and labor attorney elected to
Congress (House of Rep.) from New York City; served 1971-1977.

-Betty Friedan (1921- ); feminist leader and author of the book "The
Feminine Mystique" (1963).

-Shulamith Firestone (1945- ); Canadian feminist. Wrote "The Dialectic
of Sex" (1970).

-Andrea Dworkin (1946- ); radical; apparent lesbian. Author of the
book "Intercourse" (1987).

-Susan Brownmiller (1935- ); U.S. feminist. Wrote the book "Against
Our Will" (1975).

-Susan Faludi (1959- ); author of the book "Backlash" (1992).

-Naomi Wolf (1962- ); advisor to Al Gore in the 2000 U.S.
presidential election.

-Emma Goldman (1869-1940); early U.S. feminist.

-Ernestine Rose (1810-1892); b. in Poland; early feminist.

-Phyllis Chesler (1941- ); U.S. feminist; author of the book "Woman's
Inhumanity to Woman" (2002).

-Judy Chicago (Cohen) (1939- ); U.S. feminist. Author of the book "The
Dinner Party" (1996).

-Robin Morgan (1941- ); U.S. feminist. Former editor-in-chief, Ms.
magazine.

-Letty Cottin Pogrebin (1939- ); U.S. feminist; co-founded Ms.
magazine.

-Gerda Lerner (1920- ); b. in Austria.

-Annie Nathan Meyer (1867-1951); U.S. feminist.

-Maud Nathan (1862-1946); sister of Annie Nathan Meyer; U.S. feminist.

-Geri Palast (1950- ); chair, Committee on Women in the Global
Economy; U.S. feminist.

-Rose Schneiderman (1882-1972); b. in Poland.

-Anita Pollitzer (1894-1975); U.S. feminist; pal of artist Georgia
O'Keeffe.

-Gene Boyer (no birthyear available); a founder of N.O.W.; president
of Jewish Feminists; U.S. feminist.

-Lucy Komisar (1942- ); author of the book "The New Feminism" (1971);
U.S. feminist.

-Karen Nussbaum (1950- ); (apparently Jewish); leader of 9to5-National
Association of Working Women.

-Eleanor Flexner (1908-1995); (apparently Jewish); U.S. feminist.

-Riane Eisler (1931- ); b. Vienna; author/feminist; (apparently
Jewish-fled Nazis). Author of the book "The Chalice and the Blade"
(1987).



http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/

http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org

http://heretical.com/

Topaz
2009-03-05 16:47:39 EST

German leaders believed in death before dishonor. They knew the
allies were subhuman monsters:


The Diaries of Charles A. Lindbergh, p.986

"That young girl riding on her bicycle - she must know that on the
day the Russians come she will probably be raped by a dozen soldiers.
When do they come? In days? In weeks? That, we have not told the
Germans. She has a good face - nicely dressed in old but clean and
brightly colored garments - like the daughter of a middle class
American family. I realize that we Americans are holding her at
Dessau. She cannot flee to safety.
We will not let her pass our sentries on the roads. We are turning her
and thousands of
others like her over to the Soviet soldiers for their sport. I feel
ashamed."

p.961
"German children look in through the window. We have more food than
we need, but regulations prevent giving it to them. It is difficult to
look at them. I feel ashamed of myself, of my people, as I eat and
watch those children. They are not to blame for the war. They are
hungry children. What right have we to stuff ourselves while they look
on - well-fed men eating, leaving unwanted food on plates, while
hungry children look on."

Berlin Correspondent, The Times, September 10th, 1945

"...Another small boy turned out of Danzig had a scrawled postcard
attached to him stating that his soldier father was long since missing
and that his mother and two sisters had died of hunger."

At this time, Denmark, formerly occupied by the Germans as a means
of denying the allies a North Sea bridgehead was bursting at the seams
with surplus food and was pleading with the allies to put it to good
use. It was refused.

http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/

http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org

http://heretical.com/
Page: 1 2   Next  (First | Last)


2021 - UsenetArchives.com | Contact Us | Privacy | Stats | Site Search
Become our Patron