Perhaps after he is done he and his little neo-Nazi group will go spit on some Jewish graves. The lying pig.
2010-09-17 16:38:34 EST
By Patrick Grimm
We hear daily of the alleged dangers of "Holocaust denial." We read in newspapers the frightful scare-mongering, comparing those who deny "global warming" to "Holocaust deniers." But I purport that there is one form of denial truly more deadly to the survival of all nations than any other. It is "Jew-denial."
Now you might say, no one denies that Jews exist, that they live among us and have done quite well economically, sometimes honestly and other times dishonestly. This is not what I refer to. "Jew-denial" or a "Jew-denier" is a person, either uninformed or collusive with the overclass, who denies the power of Jews in America and the world, denies that their organized power has been corrosive (and many honest Jews will admit that it is) and denies that Jews are a racial group (their own words) who believe in their right to rule over the Goyim (which means cattle). To deny all these things is only to ignore the words of Jewish leaders and the words of the Jews' own holy books, the Torah and the Talmud. It is also to jettison mountains of evidence and decades of Jewish political activism.
But the Jew-deniers are everywhere, a ubiquitous dullard or deceptive or deceived (take your pick) band of human beings. The Jew-deniers are in our churches, in our governments, in our schools, in our military, in our White House and in some of our own houses. Now I don't believe these people should be jailed, imprisoned or fined for swallowing false news or abetting the genocide the Jews are working to bring upon us all, whites and Palestinians alike (the white is the Palestinian of the European sphere), but they should be approached with caution, mainly because a lifetime of brainwashing and hornswoggling can elicit an animalistic reaction when one of these Jew-deniers is smacked in the face with the truth.
The Jew-deniers (at least the lay ones) should be pitied rather than stigmatized, though I do exactly that with this article and I deeply apologize for that. But in all seriousness, they need help. They are not mentally ill as the Jews call any person who disagrees with their steamrolling of humanity. The Jew-deniers are misinformed and in need of rescuing from a life of reckless disinfo which the media Jews will be glad to force-feed them on a daily basis forever and ever if they are willing to read the Jew newspapers and watch inane Jew newscasts with reporters who are front men and front women for Big Jewry. These types of medium masteries only perpetuate Jew-denial and breed more little Jew-deniers, persons for whom the thought that Jewry could desire anything but beneficence and ennoblement toward the Gentile herds is a "canard" or a "libel", either bloody or bloodless, or an "anti-Semitic" screed.
Present facts, statistics, troubling Israeli massacres, Talmudic quotes, lists of ultra-liberal Jewish wheelers and dealers, anti-Christian political action committees, discombobulating historical accounts that show Jews as they are rather than as how they dress themselves up for the camera, and a Jew-denier and those who are card-carrying members of the Jew-denial movement that numbers in the millions upon millions will spit out one or more replies taken from a prepared list of oodles of Pavlovian conditioned retorts. For the sake of brevity, here are just a select few:
1.You're an anti-Semite!
This one is easy to combat because most Jews are not Semites and many non-Jews are. Most Jews are Khazars, Ashkenazi Khazars, so this characterization (anti-Semite) is a real living, breathing canard. Inform the Jew-denier of this reality and recommend Arthur Koestler's book The Thirteenth Tribe for his/her perusal. Some Jew-deniers are smart, while others don't read anything more intellectual than Harry Potter novels. If this is the case, a sympathetic and platonic hug may be in order.
2 Jews are "God's Chosen People"
If the Jew-denier is someone who believes in God, ask the Jew-denier if God is indeed a racist of the crudest sort (though this is not to say that racism defensively and properly understood is always a negative). If the reply is a reflexive egalitarian 'no', and it will be if this person goes to any Zionized, Judaized church in this country, then ask the person if he/she honestly believes that God would have sanctioned the killing of thousands upon thousands of innocent human beings only for the purpose of having the Jews procure their property, vineyards, wives, concubines, etc. Either God is a genocidal maniac or the stories of the Old Testament are Judahite-penned justifications of mass murder. It's one or the other. This is not going to wash as an argument if you are talking to a biblical literalist or one of those folks who believes that all Scripture is "God-breathed" and "inerrant." If the Jew-denier regularly sends financial love gifts to television evangelists, then quietly walk away after shaking the dust from your Reeboks.
3. Jews are just members of one of the world's monotheistic religions
Jews identify themselves as a "race", a "master race" superior to all other races and destined to enslave the world. Jews consider themselves a race, first and foremost. One helpful quote is in order: "The former Israeli Prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, speaking to Jewish group in southern California said: 'If Israel had not come into existence after World War II then I am certain the Jewish race wouldn't have survived. I stand before you and say you must strengthen your commitment to Israel.'"  Judaism is a racial religion based on blood purity and conquest of the Gentile as ordered by their holy books. This is not conspiracy theory. This is basic Old Testament hermeneutics. I won't list all the verses here where God tells the "Chosen People" that they are destined to rule the world, but you can find them in your family Bible in books like Deuteronomy and Numbers and present them to any Jew-deniers you happen to run into.
CONCLUSION Friends and countrymen, Jew-denial is an epidemic sweeping the world, especially the American portion of it. Our churches are cranking out little Judaized clones right off the conveyor Bible belt, ready to parrot the words of Cyrus Scofield and John Hagee. Our governments are rife with Judeophilic politicians scared to speak out about the Jewish hijacking of our foreign policy. They attack those like Jim Moran, even projecting Protocols of Zion conspiracies onto his temperate and reasonable critiques of AIPAC and the Israel-First-Last-And-Always Lobby. The Jew-denial movement is running wild in the United States! It is ignoring the real issues, which are Jewish dual loyalty or Israel-only loyalty, the Jewish machinations manipulating our currency and economy and the debauching of our culture and the shattering of our borders by galvanized Jews drunk and delirious with political power and ruinous regency.
Should we prosecute the Jew-deniers, persecute the Jew-denial movement on the internet, lock up its sycophants, lackeys and philo-Semitic toadies and batter these simpletons in the streets with steel pipes and tire irons? No, there's no use emulating the Jews.
We can only curb or put the kibosh on the Jew-denial movement by spreading data far and wide on the web and to anyone who will listen to the straight skinny on Jew supremacism and traitorous Jew antics. The Jew-denial campaign has done quite a bang-up job deceiving and misdirecting the energies of ordinary individuals (acolytes of Jew-deniery) away from their true enemy and their greatest threat, Jewish extremism and onto bogeymen like supposed white supremacists and radical Islamists. Because of the popular front and font of lies and anti-white disempowerment, most people are unaware or too apathetic to even notice the Big Jewry Hidden Hand pouring our liberties and our freedoms straight down the Talmudic drain. To paraphrase the son of a rabbi and the creator of Communism, Karl Marx "Jew-recognizers of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your high interest rates!"
 (Daily Pilot, Newport Beach/ Costa Mesa, Feb. 28, 2000, front page)
Hey, here's an idea, why don't you, like...you know -- get a life.
-- Powered by Linux 22.214.171.124-127 Fedora 12 In rotation: http://www.jamendo.com 126.96.36.199-0.2 OpenSUSE 11.2 "Hug your cat today" 2.6.24-16 Mint Elyssa
2010-09-18 02:18:33 EST
On 9/17/2010 20 38, Topaz wrote: > > By Patrick Grimm > > We hear daily of the alleged dangers of "Holocaust denial." We read in > newspapers the frightful scare-mongering, comparing those who deny > "global warming" to "Holocaust deniers."
I don't read any such comparison in any newspapers.
> But I purport that there is > one form of denial truly more deadly to the survival of all nations > than any other. It is "Jew-denial."
Grim Pat can purport all he likes. No one is denying that Jews exist.
> Now you might say, no one denies that Jews exist, that they live among > us and have done quite well economically, sometimes honestly and other > times dishonestly. This is not what I refer to. "Jew-denial" or a > "Jew-denier" is a person, either uninformed or collusive with the > overclass, who denies the power of Jews in America and the world, > denies that their organized power has been corrosive (and many honest > Jews will admit that it is) and denies that Jews are a racial group > (their own words) who believe in their right to rule over the Goyim > (which means cattle). To deny all these things is only to ignore the > words of Jewish leaders and the words of the Jews' own holy books, the > Torah and the Talmud. It is also to jettison mountains of evidence and > decades of Jewish political activism.
What's corrosive is the propaganda cooked up by Grim Pat to spread hate. You, Toupee, are the dim-witted tool of a hate monger.
2010-09-18 11:40:40 EST
by James Buchanan
Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of political power and banned them from the legal profession. Germany went from devastating economic poverty in 1932 to full employment just a couple years later. If an incredible economic improvement can be achieved, merely by removing the Jews from power (and replacing them with patriotic nationalists), then every Gentile nation in the world should give this a try.
Obviously the Jews don't want anyone else getting the idea of removing them to create prosperity. The Jews control the mass media in most Western countries. Most people don't know about the Balfour Declaration. During World War One, Zionist Jews offered to use their control of the press to bring America into World War One if Britain would promise them Palestine. This offer was dubbed the Balfour Declaration. If the Jews had enough media control and influence to push America into World War One in 1917, what else have they done with their power?
It was a huge embarrassment for the Jews to see Germany so prosperous in the mid-1930s after removing them from power. They considered this a dangerous precedent. To deal with this "problem" the Jewish World Congress declared war on Germany in 1933. This declaration of war at least encouraged a world-wide boycott against Germany and at worst encouraged other nations of the world to become hostile toward Germany. (The Jews curiously sanctioned the Germans before the Germans passed any laws restricting the Jews.) More importantly the Jews pushed vicious anti-German slander in all the Jewish-owned newspapers in the West in the years leading up to World War Two. The Communist mass murder of 30 million people in Russia and the Ukraine received almost no publicity in the Jewish media. Most people in the West only heard a serious mention of these Communist mass murders beginning in the 1980s. Instead, the Jewish media focused all their hatred and agitation against Germany and its allies.
After six years of relentless agitation, the Jews pushed England and France into war with Germany. Only two years later, FDR and his cabal of Jews provoked a war with Japan (and Germany).
Naturally, the Jews did not want future historians to say: "World War Two was provoked by the Jewish media in retaliation for Germany removing the Jews from power." The Jews needed a new reason for World War Two. A reason that painted their enemies as unquestionably evil. So they invented the Holocaust.
The Holocaust stood mostly unchallenged for decades after the war because people feared being branded "Nazi-sympathizers" for questioning its details. The truth always comes out in the long run. Professor Arthur Butz published his famous work "The Hoax of the 20th Century" in 1977 detailing a very solid argument against this war propaganda. Dr. Butz pointed out that the world population of Jews remained at about 16 million before and after the war. He also noted that half a million Jews remained in Paris after four years of German occupation. Both these facts strongly suggest the Holocaust is a fraud, but the political power of the Jews has suppressed and punished any public questioning of the Holocaust to this day. David Irving joined the ranks of Revisionist historians several years ago and went from a famous successful author to a pariah thanks to persecution by the Jews.
The Institute for Historical Review has done great work exposing the Holocaust as a great historical fraud. Anyone interested in looking for historical truth should visit their website. It's a shock for many people to see how much propaganda we've been force fed.
Exposing the Real Racists Edgar Johnston, PhD. reviews an important new book Jewish Supremacism by David Duke. Published by Free Speech Press, 2003
More than 500,000 copies of 'Jewish Supremacism' have been sold worldwide. It is even sold within the Russian Duma (parliament).
Jewish leaders are extremely fearful of this book. I can illustrate the cause of their concern by giving an example of David Duke's technique in exposing what he calls Jewish supremacism. If any prominent political person in the Western World publicly announced that Jews are frequently disloyal to nations where they live and that they view Gentiles as racially inferior, he would face excoriation as an 'anti-Semite'. Probably, he would be driven from office. Duke has no need to make such claims, for he simply quotes very prominent and powerful Jews who make his point for him. FROM THE HORSE'S MOUTH
In the first few pages of Jewish Supremacism, Duke quotes Dr. Steinlight, a former head of National Affairs for the largest Jewish organisation in the United States. Here is the quotation taken from a 2001 magazine article written by Dr. Steinlight:-
'I'll confess it at least, like thousands of other typical kids of my generation I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months of ten formative years... I attended Jewish summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colours, sang a foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language... and was taught the superiority of my people to the 'Gentiles' who oppressed us. 'We were taught to view non-Jews as... people less sensitive, intelligent and moral than ourselves.'
This method of quoting major Jewish figures and sources is used hundreds of times in Duke's book to advance his thesis that there is a powerful Jewish supremacist element in Judaism and Zionism that threatens not only the freedom of the Palestinian people but all nations, including the United States.
Duke also uses direct quotes from the Talmud and other major Jewish sources, such as the Jewish Encyclopedia to expose a long-standing cadre of hateful, anti-Gentile Jewish supremacists. Shocking quotes are displayed from major Jewish magazines that boast of a Jewish supremacy over the media and politics of the United States. He finds disturbing and hateful words from Jewish leaders, such as Ariel Sharon, which openly support genocide, and he reveals quotations from Israeli leaders who equate Zionism and Nazism. Of course, he also cites many prominent Gentiles of historical and contemporary times, but the Jewish quotations and sources have the greatest power. Frankly, they are so convincing that Jewish leaders have sought to get the book banned in many nations.
Interestingly, Jewish Supremacism was published first in Russia, the same nation that gave birth to The Protocols of Zion. In 2000 it quickly became a best seller throughout the entirety of the former Eastern bloc. It even sells briskly in the corridors of the Russian Duma (Parliament) and has prompted Levinsky, Goldman and other leading Jews to seek its ban under old Soviet laws forbidding 'anti-Semitism'. In the Autumn of 2000, Levinsky and others filed a formal complaint to the Russian Prosecutor General and asked for the book to be classified as anti-Semitic and thus illegal. After a year of close examination (they painstakingly verified all 669 of the documentations), the Russian Government shocked the Jewish community by officially declaring that the book is not anti-Semitic. Jewish members of the Duma then introduced new legislation aimed at outlawing 'Jewish Supremacism', but it failed by a few votes.
Since then, the book has been sold in thousands of street corners across the breadth of the Russian Federation and has now topped an incredible 500,000 in print.
Translated into most of the Eastern European languages, the book has won Duke many academic awards for its scholarship, including an honorary Doctorate awarded by President's University, the second largest university in the nation of Ukraine.
Subsequently the university itself published a best-selling Ukrainian edition. In May of 2003, Free Speech Press published the English version of Jewish Supremacism, accompanied by a storm of interest and controversy. Jewish leaders are horrified that it is well on its way to becoming the best-read book in the world on Zionism.
Although Zionist organisations have tried to use Duke's media characterisation as a 'white supremacist' to discredit his book, so far their exploitation of his early-life involvement in a KKK group has only backfired by making the book and its author more newsworthy. Attacks by the ADL and other pro-Zionist groups have led to sensationalist news coverage, causing even greater interest and confounding those who desperately wanted Duke's book to die a quiet death.
David Duke decries the label of white supremacist and says that while he certainly desires the preservation of his own heritage he seeks no supremacy over others. He maintains that those who scream most hatefully against him are themselves guilty of the most extreme and powerful supremacism on earth: Jewish supremacism.
When Duke lectured in some Persian Gulf nations last year, Zionist leaders attempted to undercut his support by allegations of 'racism'. Those organised efforts had little affect on the overflow, mixed-race audiences that cheered almost his every word. As a former university professor and a writer who has lectured occasionally on behalf of the people of Palestine, I approached David Duke's book out of a curiosity elicited by the intense Zionist efforts to suppress it. Actually, I had readily accepted the negative portrayals of him I had read in the Jewish press, but I wanted to see what all the commotion was about. Why were they so anxious to ban this book and slander its author? To my great surprise I discovered a most amazing book!
David Duke stated that he had set out with the ambitious goal of writing the most powerful expose of Zionism ever put into print. With extreme scepticism of his ability to accomplish such a lofty goal, I began to read. Three days later, as I turned the last page, I knew that he had accomplished more than he dreamed. Rather than just assembling his facts in a dry textbook fashion, David Duke presents his thesis in the first person. It is the personal narrative of a thoughtful and enlightened young man who is sympathetic to Zionism, but is awakened to its supremacist core that not only threatens the Palestinians but his own beloved European-Americans as well. I could not find even a trace of hatred, intemperance or true anti-Semitism in this book. However, by extensive quoting of important Jewish leaders and Zionist source materials, Duke exposes a deep well of Jewish supremacist hatred against Gentiles. He points out that one is unfairly labelled an 'anti-Semite' simply for exposing the hateful pronouncements of Jewish supremacists.
ABSOLVES SOME JEWS
The book is clearly not anti-Semitic. Duke goes at length to point out that not all Jews are supremacists, and that the supremacists not only endanger the Gentile world but threaten innocent Jews by exposing them to an inevitably hostile Gentile reaction. The book is in fact dedicated to the late Dr. Israel Shahak, a Holocaust survivor and Israeli peace activist whose life was dedicated to saving both Jews and Gentiles from the dangers of 'Jewish supremacism'. David Duke cleverly turns the term 'anti-Semitic' on its head by quoting columnist Joseph Sobran's remark that the 'anti-Semite' is no longer someone who dislikes Jews; he is now simply a person whom the Jews don't like.
Jewish Supremacism begins with David Duke's first great epiphany on the Jewish question: his learning that the Russian Revolution wasn't Russian but overwhelmingly Jewish. Using powerful documentary evidence, he shows that the Bolshevik Revolution was actually financed and led by Jews who had their own agenda against the Czar. He quotes from familiar and impeccable sources such as Winston Churchill, the dispatches of the American ambassador to Russia, the chief of British Intelligence and copious Jewish sources. For instance, he quotes a report from the National Archives of the United States showing that of the 384 members of the first Bolshevik government, there were more than 300 Jews and only 13 ethnic Russians.
How could such an enormous fact of history be hidden? Duke asks. His rhetorical question is answered throughout the rest of this book by giving the clear evidence of the tremendous power exercised by Jewish supremacists in government, media and the academic establishment. Not only has the pre-eminent Jewish role in the Bolshevik Revolution and its Gulags been quietly suppressed, but also even the very existence of Jewish supremacism has been kept from public awareness. One can freely discuss the evils of white supremacism, but if one dares to expose Jewish supremacism, one will assuredly be labelled an 'anti-Semite', the ultimate term of opprobrium in modern society. In very effective arguments, Duke points out that one is not called 'anti-Christian' for exposing the excesses of the Inquisition or 'anti-Muslim' for opposing the intolerance of some extremist Moslem sects. But dare simply to quote the hateful statements of important leaders of Judaism and Zionism, and in many countries one could well wind up in prison for 'hate speech'.
One of the fascinating themes to which David Duke repeatedly turns is the easily documented Jewish supremacist strategy of fostering extreme chauvinism among their own people while at the same time working to break down the group loyalty of the Gentiles among whom they live. Jewish leaders have long made clear that Jewish communities often have agendas that conflict with their Gentile hosts. Duke describes the struggle over those agendas as similar to the contest of two football teams. One team cultivates an extreme group loyalty through a chronic recital of Gentile persecution and an accompanying 'chosen-people' supremacist vision. The other is instilled with guilt and the idea that teamwork is immoral. The main Jewish holidays are dominated by the recounting of Gentile persecutions, and the Holocaust has now achieved almost a religious significance in Jewish life. Duke quotes many Jewish leaders proclaiming Jewish superiority and the need for the race to preserve its racial genotype. Even today, Israel will grant instant citizenship to an atheist Jew from New York, but forbids Palestinians who were born in Israel to return. Israel also forbids marriages between Jews and Gentiles.
While Jewish supremacists have these supremacist policies for their own people, they relentlessly work to break down the immigration laws of other nations. While they preach multi-culturalism and diversity for almost every other country in which they dwell, they themselves support and expect Americans to support a Zionist State, dedicated exclusively to the Jewish people, religion and culture.
INFLUENCE ON MEDIA AND GOVERNMENT
In chapters on Jewish influence over the American mass media and government, Duke offers extensive documentation that exceeds almost anyone's suspicions. Major Jewish sources are quoted which boast of their takeover and control of Hollywood, the news media and the most sensitive part of the Government of the United States. For instance, Duke quotes a major Israeli newspaper bragging about the fact that Jews loyal to Israel make up seven out of the eleven members of the secretive and sensitive National Security Council (NSC). The article goes on to assert that "America no longer has a government of Goyim" (Gentiles). Duke also quotes many US presidents and high government officials who have dared to speak out about the Jewish supremacy over the establishment. After thoroughly documenting Jewish supremacy in government and media, he shows how their media power is used to stifle public knowledge and understanding of this critical issue. Any legitimate criticism of Jewish Supremacism is labelled 'anti-Semitism', and the Jewish supremacists almost exclusively define that term.
In particularly interesting passages, Duke recounts how that when he looked up the term 'anti-Semitism' in some popular encyclopaedias, he found that the articles and recommended reading lists were authored entirely by Jewish zealots! In every conflict with Gentiles, Jews are always portrayed as completely innocent while Gentiles are portrayed as totally evil. Duke suggests that the chronic portrayal of Gentiles as inherently evil toward Jews is for Gentiles the equivalent of 'blood libel' for Jews.
Duke makes a compelling case that the nation of Israel is the doctrine of Jewish supremacism put into action. In startling documentary evidence from Israel, he shows that some of the early Zionist founders of the country readily co-operated with Nazi Germany, praised Nazi policies and claimed that their own ideology was similar. He also quotes major Jewish figures in Israel who have had the courage to condemn Israel's Nuremberg style racial laws, such as former Israeli Supreme Court member Haim Cohen, thus:- 'The bitter irony of fate, which has led the same biological and racist laws propagated by the Nazis and which inspired the infamous Nuremberg laws to serve as a basis of Judaism within the state of Israel.'
With these kinds of powerful quotes, it is no wonder that Zionists around the world are extremely fearful of this book.
ON ISRAELI TERROR
Americans will find the last chapter on Israel of particular interest. Duke unveils the long Israeli record of terrorism. He documents the horrendous terror waged against the Palestinians; he also exposes Israel's long record of terrorism and treachery against its greatest benefactor, the United States! From major Jewish sources, he recounts the Israeli terrorist attacks against America in the Lavon Affair, in which Israeli agents set off bombs in American installations in Egypt in a treacherous attempt to provoke America into war against that nation. Duke presents copious evidence exposing the deliberate, murderous Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in which 34 Americans were killed and 172 grievously wounded. The terrible damage inflicted on the United States by Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard is also recounted. Jewish supremacy in the American media and government has suppressed any outcry against Israel's treachery. The Jewish supremacists have even been able to prevent a formal Congressional investigation into the attack on the USS Liberty. Duke makes the powerful point that billions of dollars of American aid continue to flow to Israel even after its treacherous attacks. He writes that supplying this aid is the moral equivalent of sending military aid to Japan after the attack on Pearl Harbour.
Duke also shows how the Zionist domination of American foreign policy led directly to America's 9/11 catastrophe and a whole new series of foreign policy moves that are leading to disaster. This timely book shows the Jewish supremacist power behind the Iraq War, the manipulation of the President and the American people with false information, and the horrendous damage the war has done to our economy and even our security. Duke shows how the war is costing us hundreds of billions of dollars, continues to spill the blood of our military men and certainly increases world hatred and terrorism against America.
In one of the most shocking chapters of his work, Duke reveals the damning evidence of Israeli treachery in the 9/11 attacks. He shows that a massive Israeli spy ring was uncovered and apprehended in the months before and after the attacks, and that some of the Mossad agents had actually monitored the hijackers, including the leader Mohammed Atta (five Israeli agents lived on his street). Warning messages of the impending attacks were sent to Israeli firms with offices both in Israel and the World Trade Centre. A group of Mossad agents was arrested on 9/11 after they were found to have been filming and cheering the attacks while they occurred. After they had been held for a few months, Zionist Michael Chertoff of the US Department of Justice released all the members of the Israeli spy ring and allowed them to return to Israel - out of the reach of Congressional 9/11 investigators.
It is impossible to give the reader more than a glance into the depth and power of this incredible book. Practically every paragraph is a revelation. There is so much more that I could write about: detailing how the Holocaust has cynically been used as a Zionist tool in heightening Jewish solidarity and deflating criticism of Zionism and Israel; how Jewish supremacists have used immigration as a weapon of conquest, not only in Palestine but in the Western World as well. I was fascinated by Duke's expose of Sigmund Freud as a secret Jewish supremacist who thought of himself as a Hannibal destroying the foundations of the Christian church and the European family as Hannibal had sacked Rome. I could go on and on, but I will leave these discoveries to you when you read this amazing book.
After I completed the book, I wanted to find out if it had the same affect on others as it had on me. I gave it to two long-time friends at the university where I taught for 11 years. One has conservative leanings; the other is decidedly liberal; and I would describe both of them as sympathetic to Israel. Both were so fascinated that they could hardly put the book down, and one became so engrossed that he missed his regular two o'clock class. They both agreed that Duke's book is one of the best-argued that they have ever read, and used the identical term of 'amazing' to describe it. My conservative friend commented that many quotations were so shocking that he began to check out the references and found them all to be accurate. "Hell" he said, "If only half the documents Duke cites are authentic, there is enough evidence here to start a revolution."
On 9/18/2010 15 40, Topaz wrote: > by James Buchanan > > Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of > political power and banned them from the legal profession.
Instead, let's state the truth, that Nazi Germany took away the civil rights of Jews, deprived them of their businesses, homes, personal property and even their lives.
Your heroes were evil men.
2010-09-19 01:06:45 EST
On 9/18/2010 15 41, Topaz wrote: > > Exposing the Real Racists > Edgar Johnston, PhD. reviews an important new book > Jewish Supremacism by David Duke. Published by Free Speech Press, 2003 > > More than 500,000 copies of 'Jewish Supremacism' have been sold > worldwide. It is even sold within the Russian Duma (parliament). > > Jewish leaders are extremely fearful of this book. I can illustrate > the cause of their concern by giving an example of David Duke's > technique in exposing what he calls Jewish supremacism.
David Duke's "technique" is to lie his cracker ass off.
2010-09-19 06:41:03 EST
ADOLF HITLER SCHWERIN, GUSTLOFF'S FUNERAL SPEECH OF FEBRUARY 12, 1936
. . . BEHIND every murder stood the same power which is responsible for this murder; behind these harmless insignificant fellow-countrymen who were instigated and incited to crime stands the hate-filled power of our Jewish foe, a foe to whom we had done no harm, but who none the less sought to subjugate our German people and make of it its slave - the foe who is responsible for all the misfortune that fell upon us in 1918, for all the misfortune which plagued Germany in the years that followed. Those members of the Party and honorable comrades of ours all fell, and the same fate was planned for others: many hundreds survived as cripples or severely wounded, blinded or lamed; more than 40,000 others were injured. And among them were so many loyal folk whom we all knew and who were near and dear to us, of whom we were sure that they could never do any harm to anyone, that they had never done any harm to anyone, whose only crime was that they devoted themselves to the cause of Germany.
In the ranks of those whose lives were thus sacrificed there stood also Horst Wessel, the singer who gave to the Movement its song, never dreaming that he would join those spirits who march and have marched with us.
And now on foreign soil National Socialism has gained its first conscious martyr - a man who did nothing save to enter the lists for Germany which is not only his sacred right but his duty in this world: a man who did nothing save remember his homeland and pledge himself to her in loyalty. He, too, was murdered, just like so many others. Even at the time when on January 30 three years ago we had come into power, precisely the same things happened in Germany, at Frankfort on the Oder, at Köpenick, and again at Brunswick. The procedure was always the same: a few men come and call someone out of his house and then stab or shoot him down.
That is no chance: it is the same guiding hand which organized these crimes and purposes to do so again. Now for the first time one who is responsible for these acts has appeared in his own person. For the first time he employs no harmless German fellow-countryman. It is a title to fame for Switzerland, as it is for our own Germans in Switzerland, that no one let himself be hired to do this deed so that for the first time the spiritual begetter of the act must himself perform the act. So our comrade has fallen a victim to that power which wages a fanatical warfare not only against our German people but against every free, autonomous, and independent people. We understand the challenge to battle and we take up the gage! My dear comrade! You have not fallen in vain!
If you've been listening to many of my broadcasts you will know that the issue I talk about most often is that of media control. In nearly every broadcast I have pointed out that the people who control the mass media of news and entertainment are able to manipulate the opinions and attitudes of about 95 per cent of the population. I have pointed out that the media bosses do this manipulation deliberately and in collusion with one another, taking advantage of the compelling need most people have to conform their ideas and their behavior to a perceived norm.
The media bosses use their control over the mass media of entertainment -- and to a lesser extent over the news media -- to create an artificial norm that is presented to the public through television, motion pictures, advertising, and other media, and this artificial norm is the one perceived as real by most of the public. Through their control of public opinion the media bosses also control the democratic political process and governmental policy in a way that is advantageous to them and disadvantageous to the White public. And these media bosses are overwhelmingly Jews.
That has been the message I have presented over and over again in many of these broadcasts. I have talked about different facets of Jewish media control and have presented different specifics, different details, in various broadcasts. I've discussed a number of different Hollywood films or television shows as specific examples of the way in which the Jews use their media control to brainwash the public, to promote fashions and styles and behavior that are harmful to our people but that advance the long-term schemes of the Jews to further dominate and exploit our society.
(Some of this may be outdated today, but it still explains why things are the way they are)
I've talked about specific Jews who control various segments of the mass media, and I've pointed out specific instances of the destructive way in which they use their control. I've talked about the Jewish media boss Sumner Redstone and his control of MTV and CBS and the Hollywood film studio Paramount Pictures. I've talked about the Jewish media boss Michael Eisner and his control of the Disney Company and ABC. I've talked about the Jewish media boss Gerald Levin and his control of Time Warner and CNN. I've talked about the Jewish media boss Edgar Bronfman and his control of the largest segment of the popular music industry and Universal Studios in Hollywood. And I've talked about dozens of other Jewish media bosses and the media they control and the specific ways in which they use those media. In particular, during the past few months I've talked about several recent Hollywood films which deliberately target teenaged White girls and brainwash them with the notion that it is fashionable for them to have sex with Black males.
And of course, I've talked about the Jewish control of the news media as well as the entertainment media. In a way similar to their use of the entertainment media to set popular fashions, the Jewish media bosses distort and censor the news in order to give the public a distorted picture of what is happening in the world. I've given several very specific examples of this Jewish management of the news in recent months.
I've talked about the total blackout at the national level of the news of the atrocious rape and massacre of Whites in Wichita, Kansas, by Blacks last December, and I've talked about the almost total suppression of the news of the Black racial attacks on Whites in Seattle in the Mardi Gras riot at the end of February this year. I also talked about the downplaying of the racial aspects of the Black rioting in Cincinnati in April of this year, about the failure of the news media outside the immediate Cincinnati area to mention the deliberate targeting of Whites, especially White women, by the Black rioters. And I described the gross distortions in the news coverage of the racial politics in York, Pennsylvania, that led to the current White mayor of York being charged in May with the killing of a Black during a Black race riot in York 32 years ago.
I have pointed out repeatedly how all of this suppression of the news and distortion of the news is aimed at creating and maintaining a false picture in the public mind of racial conflict in the United States. In this false picture Whites always are the aggressors, Blacks or other non-Whites are the innocent victims, and the root of all racial conflict is White racism.
In a number of my broadcasts I've discussed at length why the Jews do what they do: why they use their media control in such a deceptive and destructive way, what their motives are. I've also talked about how they collaborate. I've pointed out that their propaganda policies are not formulated independently, but that they have a coherent party line that they all follow. I've given a number of specific examples of this. Well, all of these things that I've talked about have not gone unnoticed by the Jewish media bosses themselves. When people expose their activities or their scheming they pay attention. In particular, they have been paying attention to these American Dissident Voices broadcasts and to the work of my organization, the National Alliance. They read what's on our Web sites at natvan.com and natall.com and resistance.com, and they talk about it among themselves. This shows up pretty clearly in the uniform way in which their media respond to us. Whether it's the Associated Press or Time magazine or the Washington Post or a television news commentator anywhere in the United States, they always use the same phrasing in talking about us. They always use the word "hate" in referring to us. They always say that the National Alliance is the "most dangerous organized hate group" in America, despite the fact that all we do is disseminate to the public the truth about what they're doing. That's what they regard as "dangerous" and as "hate."
If you want to see a current indicator of the fact that they do think about us, go to the Web site promoting Steven Spielberg's new movie,A.I. There you'll see a parody of a part of the National Alliance's Web site in the form of a page headed "Who Is the Anti-Robot Militia?" It's obviously copied, almost word for word, from the page "Who Is the National Alliance?" on our Web site. It's difficult for me to understand what they hoped to accomplish with this parody. Perhaps they believe that it will make people take us less seriously.
Somewhat less quirky but much more directly deceptive are their standard smokescreen responses. It used to be that whenever I would raise the issue of Jewish monopoly control of the mass media of news and entertainment during an interview or on a call-in program, I would hear the response from a Jew or an apologist for the Jews: "What about Ted Turner? He's not a Jew," as if that negated everything I had said. Of course, that response was used before Ted Turner's CNN was taken over by the very Jewish Time Warner. And now that Ted Turner has been eased out of all decision-making positions in the cable news network he built and has been replaced by Jews, one doesn't hear the Ted Turner response any longer.
The standard responses today, the ones I hear as often as I used to hear the Ted Turner response, are the "it's the shareholders" and the "it's the big bankers." Whenever I start naming names -- whenever I begin talking about the control over the media wielded by Michael Eisner or Sumner Redstone, for example, a Jew will pop up with the response: "Those guys don't control the media. It's the shareholders who control the media. Eisner and Redstone are just employees. The shareholders tell them what to do." A variation on this theme is, "Eisner and Redstone don't own the media. It's the big banks that own all of the media, and most of the big bankers are Gentiles."
Well, of course, that's not really true, and they know it's not true. The big Jewish media bosses are mostly quite autonomous. Sumner Redstone, for example, owns outright two-thirds of the shares in his media empire. His personal fortune is more than 12 billion dollars, according to Forbes magazine this month. I'm quite sure he doesn't check with any shareholders before he dreams up some new piece of race-mixing filth for MTV.
As for Gentile bankers telling the Jewish media bosses what kind of propaganda they must produce for the public, that's total nonsense. I haven't yet done a study of the investment banking industry to determine what percentage of Jews and what percentage of Gentiles are involved in it, but one thing that's certain is that the Gentile bankers would faint dead away at the thought of telling Jewish media bosses such as Michael Eisner or the Sulzberger family or the Newhouses or Sumner Redstone to cut back on the race-mixing propaganda. Gentile bankers as a class are rich, deracinated capons, whose only interest is money.
Every Jewish propaganda medium -- CBS or MTV or Time magazine or the New York Times -- is staffed from top to bottom with Jews, and they all know what they're doing. They work as a tribe, as a swarm of termites gnawing at the foundations of our existence. There is total agreement among the media Jews as to the general thrust of their propaganda. They may disagree on many of the details -- they may even compete against each other for a bigger slice of the media pie -- but all agree on the general goals of degrading and subverting Gentile civilization, of corrupting Gentile institutions, of mongrelizing our race. Again, the Jews work as a tribe, and that is the source of their strength and their success.
Gentile bankers, on the other hand, work only for themselves. They would not dream of combining and using their financial strength to protect our people from the Jews. They are terrified of the Jews, of the media. The more money they have, the more selfish and the more cowardly they are. The huge difference, the decisive difference, between the Jews and our people is that they work as a tribe, and we work as individuals. They work together, rich Jews and poor Jews, for their common tribal interests, against us, and until now we have failed to organize effectively to defend ourselves against them.
Anyway, my point is that their defense against my exposure of their activities and their power over our government is orchestrated - that is, they've all gotten together and decided what their defense will be -- and it's a deliberate lie. As I continue to expose the destructive activities of the Jewish media bosses, you will continue to hear them and their apologists respond that they really don't have any power, that it's the Gentile shareholders and the Gentile bankers who control the media. A lot of dimwits will believe that lie. A lot of couch potatoes, a lot of soccer moms, a lot of baseball fans, a lot of lemmings, will believe that it's not the Jew Sumner Redstone who deliberately uses MTV to corrupt White teenagers; instead it's some cabal of Gentile shareholders and Gentile bankers who tell him what to do, and Redstone is only an employee who follows their orders.
I think it's time for us to orchestrate our exposure of the Jewish media. I think it's about time for the public, lemmings and all, to begin hearing a uniform charge against them, a uniform statement of our opposition to them. How about this: The Jews are our misfortune. That's simple, and it's true, and it's easy to remember. Repeat after me: The Jews are our misfortune. Let's use that statement. Let's let everyone hear it. Let's impress it on everyone's consciousness: The Jews are our misfortune.
Of course, when I say the Jews are our misfortune, I'm not talking only about the Jewish media bosses. I'm not talking only about the Jews at the top, such as Sumner Redstone and the Sulzbergers and Michael Eisner and the others who formulate and direct the propaganda line against Gentile society; I'm talking about the whole tribe, and I believe that message comes across in the statement, the Jews are our misfortune. Let me tell you what the standard lemming response will be to that statement, the response that they have been taught and will parrot back.
First, from the religious lemmings it will be something like this: "Oh, no, the Jews aren't our misfortune, we owe everything to the Jews. Don't you know that Jesus was a Jew and God was his father? That makes God a Jew. We must do what the Jews tell us. They are God's people." I'm sure that argument is embarrassing to some of the more sophisticated apologists for the Jews, but many Christian Fundamentalists use it, and I've heard it often.
>From the secular lemmings it will be more like: "Don't you know that Freud and Einstein and Salk were Jews? We wouldn't have a space program if it weren't for Einstein. We wouldn't have a cure for polio if it weren't for Salk. The Jews are our fortune, not our misfortune." Well, of course, our space program has practically nothing to do with Einstein or his Jewishness. Gentile thinkers envisioned it and pioneered both its theoretical basis and its practical development. The German theoretician, Hermann Oberth, and the Russian, Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, were two of the Gentiles who independently demonstrated mathematically the feasibility of space travel in the early years of the last century. The American rocket pioneer Robert Goddard and the German Wernher von Braun designed actual rockets and built the vehicles which were the precursors of today's space ships. Jews didn't become involved until it became glamorous and profitable. And the development of a polio vaccine hardly would have missed a beat if Jonas Salk had gone into the garment business instead of medicine. He was one of a team, and he got the credit for the work of others as well as for his own work.
The reasons we hear these silly and groundless claims in the first place about how much we owe the Jews -- the reasons are Jewish media control and Jewish tribalism, Jewish support for their own. Freud was given the enormous buildup he received for his theorizing about anal personalities and penis envy and the like because he was a Jew, not because of any genuine merit in his theorizing. Other Jewish writers recognized him as one of their own and propelled him to a position of undeserved authority, and his theories ultimately did an enormous amount of damage to the development of our understanding of psychology and mental disease. Einstein was a competent mathematical physicist, but a great deal of the publicity he received was based on the fact that he was a Jew rather than on the merits of his work. As in the case of Salk, Jewish publicists gave Einstein credit for the work of others as well as for his own work.
What we must do is look at the balance sheet. Is the damage done to our race by Karl Marx and all of his Jewish followers in the communist movement -- the selective murder of more than 30 million of the best of our people in Europe during the past century -- offset by whatever contributions Einstein and Salk and other Jews have made -- even if they did everything their Jewish boosters claim for them? Certainly, there have been many other Jews who were competent and creative engineers and scientists besides Einstein and Salk. Not every clever Jew became a lawyer or a scriptwriter or a pawn shop owner or a middleman. Some became chemists or mathematicians or physicists. But can all of them together make up for the mass murders Lazar Kaganovich perpetrated aginst the Ukrainians, for the rapes and murders of German civilians instigated by Ilya Ehrenburg, for the Eastern European girls still being forced into sexual slavery on a huge scale today by Israeli slave dealers?
I think not. And I have not yet put on the balance sheet what the Jewish masters of America's mass media have done and are doing to us. What can possibly compensate White Americans for the deliberate, malevolent corruption of our young people by just one Jewish gangster like Sumner Redstone and his MTV? The race-mixing, culture-destroying, hip-hop filth churned out by Sumner Redstone's MTV seven days a week is the single most destructive influence in American life today. And of course, Redstone doesn't produce this filth all by himself. He has thousands of Jews working for him at every level, not only in MTV but also in CBS and in Paramount Pictures and in all of his other media properties.
And although MTV, targeting White teenagers as it does, may seem the most blatantly and maliciously destructive of the Jewish media, it is hardly much worse than some of the filth being poured into the minds of the American public by Michael Eisner's Disney empire: especially by its Miramax films division under the Weinstein brothers. The fact that much of the entertainment produced by Eisner's Disney Company is relatively nnocuous does not compensate for the fact that some of it is pure poison. The poison is being introduced gradually, more and more each year, and it is having its effect. When the Disney Company was entirely a Gentile company a few years ago, its output of ntertainment may sometimes have been excessively bland, but none of it was poison designed to corrupt White Americans.
And what can possibly compensate on our balance sheet for what the Jewish news media are doing in their deliberate, calculated distortion of the picture of the world seen by the American public. It is a picture which has been designed to confuse White Americans, to undermine their self-confidence, to induce feelings of racial guilt in them. Just one example: the systematic suppression of the news of Black crimes against White people and the exaggeration of the news of every White crime against non-Whites is not a fluke. It is done routinely by all of the Jewish news media: by the New York Times, by the Washington Post, by Time magazine and Newsweek magazine, by CNN and ABC News and CBS News and NBC News and all the rest. And interracial crime is just one issue. The relations between the sexes; immigration; the foreign relations of the United States with the rest of the world, especially in the Middle East; and a hundred other important issues are similarly distorted in their portrayal by the media. This deliberate distortion of the public's view of the world has done irreparable damage to the American system of government and to American society. And again: the distortion has been deliberate, planned, systematic, and intended to do harm to us. No number of funny Jewish comedians, or successful Jewish entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley or on Wall Street, or clever Jewish medical researchers can compensate for this harm.
When we look at the balance sheet the conclusion is clear beyond any doubt: the Jews are our misfortune. It's way past time for us to accept this conclusion, to overcome our fears of being labeled "anti-Semitic" for accepting this conclusion, to brush aside these fears which have been instilled in us by the propaganda of the mass media, and then to begin working to improve our fortunes.