Activism Discussion: Jewed As Usual

Jewed As Usual
Posts: 9

Report Abuse

Use this form to report abuse or request takedown.
The requests are usually processed within 48 hours.

Page: 1   (First | Last)

Topaz
2011-09-15 06:28:07 EST
Oakland Museum Cancels Palestinian Kids' War Art
San Francisco Chronicle
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/09/09/BA921L2H5J.DTL

An Oakland children's museum, citing pressure from the community,
canceled a planned exhibit of artwork by Palestinian youth that
depicted the Israeli assault during the 2008-09 Gaza conflict. The
Museum of Children's Art was scheduled to display the art from Sept.
24 to Nov. 13. The exhibit had been in the works for several months,
with an opening reception to feature poetry and special art activities
for children. The drawings in the exhibit were created by children
ranging in age from about 9 to 11 and included bombs dropping, tanks
and people getting shot ... The complaints came from Jewish groups as
well as others in the community, board members said.

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com

Tim Howard
2011-09-16 23:42:53 EST
On 9/15/2011 3:28 AM, Topaz wrote:
> Oakland Museum Cancels Palestinian Kids' War Art
> San Francisco Chronicle
> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/09/09/BA921L2H5J.DTL
>
> An Oakland children's museum, citing pressure from the community,
> canceled a planned exhibit of artwork by Palestinian youth that
> depicted the Israeli assault during the 2008-09 Gaza conflict. The
> Museum of Children's Art was scheduled to display the art from Sept.
> 24 to Nov. 13. The exhibit had been in the works for several months,
> with an opening reception to feature poetry and special art activities
> for children. The drawings in the exhibit were created by children
> ranging in age from about 9 to 11 and included bombs dropping, tanks
> and people getting shot ... The complaints came from Jewish groups as
> well as others in the community, board members said.
>
A real liberal would oppose that censorship. But what if it was Jewish
youth with artwork depicting suicide bombing and other terrorist acts
against them by Palestinians? Would you be so quick to defend their
artistic freedom?

I would bet such an exhibit would also be pulled after inevitable
Arab-American protests.

Topaz
2011-09-17 06:18:26 EST
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 20:42:53 -0700, Tim Howard
<*d@suddenlink.net> wrote:

>On 9/15/2011 3:28 AM, Topaz wrote:
>> Oakland Museum Cancels Palestinian Kids' War Art
>> San Francisco Chronicle
>> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/09/09/BA921L2H5J.DTL
>>
>> An Oakland children's museum, citing pressure from the community,
>> canceled a planned exhibit of artwork by Palestinian youth that
>> depicted the Israeli assault during the 2008-09 Gaza conflict. The
>> Museum of Children's Art was scheduled to display the art from Sept.
>> 24 to Nov. 13. The exhibit had been in the works for several months,
>> with an opening reception to feature poetry and special art activities
>> for children. The drawings in the exhibit were created by children
>> ranging in age from about 9 to 11 and included bombs dropping, tanks
>> and people getting shot ... The complaints came from Jewish groups as
>> well as others in the community, board members said.
>>
>A real liberal would oppose that censorship. But what if it was Jewish
>youth with artwork depicting suicide bombing and other terrorist acts
>against them by Palestinians? Would you be so quick to defend their
>artistic freedom?
>
>I would bet such an exhibit would also be pulled after inevitable
>Arab-American protests.

That is wrong. America is ruled by the Jews. Everyone fears them and
the TV is on their side.


"It's permissible to discuss the power of every other group, from the
Black Muslims to the Christian Right, but the much greater power of
the Jewish Establishment is off-limits. That, in fact, is the chief
measure of its power: its ability to impose its own taboos while
tearing down the taboos of others - you might almost say its
prerogative of offending. You can read articles in Jewish-controlled
publications from the [New York] Times to Commentary blaming
Christianity for the Holocaust or accusing Pope Pius XII of
indifference to it, but don't look for articles in any major
publication that wants to stay in business examining the Jewish role
in Communism and liberalism, however temperately."

http://www.sobran.com/establishment.shtml
"The Jewish Establishment
(Reprinted from SOBRAN'S, September 1995, pages 4-5)
In the early 1930s, Walter Duranty of the New York Times was in
Moscow, covering Joe Stalin the way Joe Stalin wanted to be covered.
To maintain favor and access, he expressly denied that there was
famine in Ukraine even while millions of Ukrainian Christians were
being starved into submission. For his work Duranty won the Pulitzer
Prize for journalism.

To this day, the Times remains the most magisterial and respectable of
American newspapers.

Now imagine that a major newspaper had had a correspondent in Berlin
during roughly the same period who hobnobbed with Hitler, portrayed
him in a flattering light, and denied that Jews were being mistreated
- thereby not only concealing, but materially assisting the regime's
persecution. Would that paper's respectability have been unimpaired
several decades later?

There you have an epitome of what is lamely called 'media bias.' The
Western supporters of Stalin haven't just been excused; they have
received the halo of victimhood for the campaign, in what liberals
call the 'McCarthy era,' to get them out of the government, the
education system, and respectable society itself.

Not only persecution of Jews but any critical mention of Jewish power
in the media and politics is roundly condemned as 'anti-Semitism.' But
there isn't even a term of opprobrium for participation in the mass
murders of Christians. Liberals still don't censure the Communist
attempt to extirpate Christianity from Soviet Russia and its empire,
and for good reason - liberals themselves, particularly Jewish
liberals, are still trying to uproot Christianity from America.

Power openly acquired, openly exercised, and openly discussed is one
thing. You may think organized labor or the Social Security lobby
abuses its power, but you don't jeopardize your career by saying so.
The Jewish establishment, it hardly needs saying, is predominantly
secularist and systematically anti-Christian. In fact, it is unified
far more by its hostility to Christianity than by its support of
Israel, on which it is somewhat divided. The more left-wing Jews are
faintly critical of Israel, though never questioning its 'right to
exist' - that is, its right to exist on terms forbidden to any
Christian country; that is, its right to deny rights to non-Jews.
A state that treated Jews as Israel treats gentiles would be condemned
outright as Nazi-like. But Israel is called 'democratic,' even
'pluralistic.'

Explicitly 'Jewish' organizations like the American Jewish Committee
and the Anti-Defamation League enforce a dual standard. What is
permitted to Israel is forbidden to America. This is not just
thoughtless inconsistency. These organizations consciously support
one set of principles here - equal rights for all, ethnic neutrality,
separation of church and state - and their precise opposites in
Israel, where Jewish ancestry and religion enjoy privilege. They
'pass' as Jeffersonians when it serves their purpose, espousing rules
that win the assent of most Americans. At the same time, they are bent
on sacrificing the national interest of the United States to the
interests of Israel, under the pretense that both countries' interests
are 'identical. (There is, of course, no countervailing American lobby
in Israel.)

The single most powerful Jewish lobbying group is the American Israel
Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), which, as its former director Thomas
Dine openly boasted, controls Congress. At a time when even Medicare
may face budget cuts, aid to Israel remains untouchable. If the
Israelis were to begin 'ethnic cleansing' against Arabs in Israel and
the occupied lands, it is inconceivable that any American political
figure would demand the kind of military strike now being urged
against the Serbs in ex-Yugoslavia.


Jewish-owned publications like the Wall Street Journal, The New
Republic, The Atlantic Monthly, U.S. News & World Report, the New York
Post, and New York's Daily News emit relentless pro-Israel propaganda;
so do such pundits as William Safire, A.M. Rosenthal, Charles
Krauthammer, Jeane Kirkpatrick, and George Will, to name a few.
That Israel's journalistic partisans include so many gentiles - lapsed
goyim, you might say - is one more sign of the Jewish establishment's
power. So is the fact that this fact isn't mentioned in public (though
it is hardly unnoticed in private.)

So is the fear of being called 'anti-Semitic.' Nobody worries about
being called 'anti-Italian' or 'anti-French' or 'anti-Christian';
these aren't words that launch avalanches of vituperation and make
people afraid to do business with you.

It's pointless to ask what 'anti-Semitic' means. It means trouble.
It's an attack signal. The practical function of the word is not to
define or distinguish things, but to conflate them indiscriminately -
to equate the soberest criticism of Israel or Jewish power with the
murderous hatred of Jews. And it works. Oh, how it works.
When Joe McCarthy accused people of being Communists, the charge was
relatively precise. You knew what he meant. The accusation could be
falsified. In fact the burden of proof was on the accuser: when
McCarthy couldn't make his loose charges stick, he was ruined. (Of
course, McCarthy was hated less for his 'loose' charges than for his
accurate ones. His real offense was stigmatizing the Left.)

The opposite applies to charges of 'anti-Semitism.' The word has no
precise definition. An 'anti-Semite' may or may not hate Jews. But he
is certainly hated by Jews. There is no penalty for making the charge
loosely; the accused has no way of falsifying the charge, since it
isn't defined.

A famous example. When Abe Rosenthal accused Pat Buchanan of
'anti-Semitism,' everyone on both sides understood the ground rules.
There was a chance that Buchanan would be ruined, even if the charge
was baseless. And there was no chance that Rosenthal would be ruined -
even if the charge was baseless.

Such are the rules. I violate them, in a way, even by spelling them
out. 'Anti- Semitism' is therefore less a charge than a curse, an
imprecation that must be uttered formulaically. Being a 'bogus
predicate,' to use Gilbert Ryle's phrase, it has no real content, no
functional equivalent in plain nouns and verbs. Its power comes from
the knowledge of its potential targets, the gentiles, that powerful
people are willing to back it up with material penalties.

In other words, journalists are as afraid of Jewish power as
politicians are. This means that public discussion is cramped and
warped by unspoken fear - a fear journalists won't acknowledge,
because it embarrasses their pretense of being fearless critics of
power. When there are incentives to accuse but no penalties for
slander, the result is predictable.

What is true of 'anti-Semitism' is also true to a lesser degree of
other bogus predicates like 'racism,' 'sexism,' and 'homophobia.'
Other minorities have seen and adopted the successful model of the
Jewish establishment. And so our public tongue has become not only
Jewish-oriented but more generally minority-oriented in its
inhibitions.

The illusion that we enjoy free speech has been fostered by the
breaking of Christian taboos, which has become not only safe but
profitable. To violate minority taboos is 'offensive' and
'insensitive'; to violate Christian taboos - many of them shared by
religious Jews - is to be 'daring' and 'irreverent.' ('Irreverence,'
of course, has become good.)

Jewry, like Gaul, may be divided into three parts, each defined by its
borders vis-vis the gentile world. There are the Orthodox, who not
only insist on borders but wear them. They often dress in attire that
sets them apart; they are even willing to look outlandish to gentiles
in order to affirm their identity and their distinctive way of life.
At the other extreme are Jews who have no borders, who may (or may
not) assimilate and intermarry, whose politics may range from left to
right, but who in any case accept the same set of rules for everyone.
I respect both types.

But the third type presents problems. These are the Jews who maintain
their borders furtively and deal disingenuously with gentiles. Raymond
Chandler once observed of them that they want to be Jews among
themselves but resent being seen as Jews by gentiles. They want to
pursue their own distinct interests while pretending that they have no
such interests, using the charge of 'anti-Semitism' as sword and
shield. As Chandler put it, they are like a man who refuses to give
his real name and address but insists on being invited to all the best
parties.

Unfortunately, it's this third type that wields most of the power and
skews the rules for gentiles. The columnist Richard Cohen cites an old
maxim: 'Dress British, think Yiddish.'


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com

Tim Howard
2011-09-17 22:04:50 EST
On 9/17/2011 3:18 AM, Topaz wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 20:42:53 -0700, Tim Howard
> <tim.howard@suddenlink.net> wrote:
>
>> On 9/15/2011 3:28 AM, Topaz wrote:
>>> Oakland Museum Cancels Palestinian Kids' War Art
>>> San Francisco Chronicle
>>> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/09/09/BA921L2H5J.DTL
>>>
>>> An Oakland children's museum, citing pressure from the community,
>>> canceled a planned exhibit of artwork by Palestinian youth that
>>> depicted the Israeli assault during the 2008-09 Gaza conflict. The
>>> Museum of Children's Art was scheduled to display the art from Sept.
>>> 24 to Nov. 13. The exhibit had been in the works for several months,
>>> with an opening reception to feature poetry and special art activities
>>> for children. The drawings in the exhibit were created by children
>>> ranging in age from about 9 to 11 and included bombs dropping, tanks
>>> and people getting shot ... The complaints came from Jewish groups as
>>> well as others in the community, board members said.
>>>
A real liberal would oppose that censorship. But what if it was Jewish
youth with artwork depicting suicide bombing and other terrorist acts
against them by Palestinians? Would you be so quick to defend their
artistic freedom?




Topaz
2011-09-18 06:07:02 EST
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 19:04:50 -0700, Tim Howard
<*d@suddenlink.net> wrote:

>A real liberal would oppose that censorship. But what if it was Jewish
>youth with artwork depicting suicide bombing and other terrorist acts
>against them by Palestinians? Would you be so quick to defend their
>artistic freedom?

Yes, the side with the truth has nothing to fear.


"Witnesses watched as more than 60 Palestinian shops were bulldozed to
the ground this week in one West Bank village, while the owners stood
by and watch helplessly. But not one American in ten saw or heard
about this in the US press.

An educated American pro-life activist was surprised to disbelief
when I told him that the Israeli death losses run about one-fourth the
number or Palestinians killed by Israelis. He thought the statistics
were reversed, having never heard or seen a count in the US press, he
has been brain scrubbed. Misinformation by the US press is not
excusable in the Internet age. So Israel has provided an Orwellian
propaganda filter called the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs
(IMFA) that makes it all possible. It provides the convenient excuse
the US press needs to look the other way and print abridged stories,
keeping most of us ignorant.

The propaganda arm of the Israeli military has once again been caught
purposefully lying about the death count among its forces. We believe
their purpose in doing this is to condition Americans into accepting
Israel's use of American-made weapons of mass destruction against the
vulnerable civilian population in Gaza and the West Bank. Israel's
willing facilitator is the US Media, which spreads their distorted
stories in the USA. This same pattern of misrepresentation is repeated
again and again, proving how important and routine propaganda is to
Israel.

On December 5th, the IMFA released an account of two suspected
sacrifice bombers (wrongly called suicide bombers*) who allegedly
killed 22 persons and wounded more than 100. But the press release
failed to mention that there were also Israeli military casualties in
the raid. Furthermore, their account omitted the fact that a female
army sergeant was among the killed. The omission is significant. It
fits perfectly into the predictable pattern of how the IMFA deceives
Americans almost daily. This practice repeatedly uses almost every
report of Israeli deaths to distort the facts of their conflict with
the Palestinians. We will now teach you how to read between the lies
and know when the story is distorted.

THE PATTERN OF DECEPTION
On November 19, 2002, the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs (IMFA)
re-manufactured a similar story about a Palestinian sacrifice raid on
a military target. Twelve Israeli soldiers and paramilitary fighting
men were killed and there was no collateral damage (civilians dead).
The propagandists changed the "facts" to call the raid a "Massacre of
innocent (Israeli) civilians," as the story was carried in the US
press. It is a total and complete bald-faced lie, which We Hold These
Truths alone corrected it in our article: U. S. Media, Caught Lying...

Again http://www.whtt.org/articles/021224.htm
This writer put the facts together from the Israeli military's own
documents one month after the event was misreported. Do you, dear
reader, know how to recognize such lies for yourself so you don't have
to wait for us to unravel it for you? To do this one must first
understand the quaint language of the IMFA. We call these lies
"z-facts" (short for Zionist facts) meaning lies that are couched in
official, narrative sounding language but are indeed untrue. Here is
how the Hebron report was distorted by z- facts, which the Media
reported as rear facts. The first release from the IMFA read:

"THE TERROR ATTACK IN HEBRON CLAIMED 12 LIVES." and "PALESTINIAN
GUNMEN" had opened fire on "JEWISH WORSHIPPERS WALKING HOME FROM
RELIGIOUS SERVICES,"

Z-facts differ from bald-faced lies because they do not state outright
all the killed or wounded are civilians, but it is clearly implied.
(In those rare cases where everyone killed are indeed civilian, the
IMFA says so and saves its lies for a later day.) The truth is told
only if it suits the teller. By calling an attack on an armed military
unit a "terror attack" on "Jewish worshipers" and "claiming 12 lives,"
the z-facts leave the a clear impression that those killed were
civilians. Any honest account would have called it "an attack on
Israeli military unit by Palestinian guerillas" etc. In our previous
article we explained the procedure as follows: "The Israeli Ministry
of Foreign Affairs is a propaganda arm of the Israeli Defense Force
(IDF).-They are the first to know who is killed. But they cause the
story to be circulated that all killed were civilians because it
serves their purpose. Then, once the misinformation has reached the
American public, the corrected story is allowed to surface in Israel,
though the false images are never corrected in the eyes of the
American public." http://www.whtt.org/articles/021224.htm (please
forgive us for quoting ourselves, but we are the best source)

In January 5th story Israel did it again. This time every one of our
readers should have detected the lie without being told. The press in
both countries used the same predictable, deceptive language. Each
stated "22 Israelis" had been killed and many more wounded. Had all
those killed or wounded had been non-military the report would most
likely have called them "civilians." The generic term "Israelis"
suggest to us that the IMFA is hiding something, not wanting to
identify who was really killed. They were.

Later the same day, a sad corrected story was carried with the names
of those killed. The IMFA stated that all of the victims had been
identified and included Staff Sgt. Mazal Orkobi of Azor. Ha'aretz
subsequently revealed in an obituary that Sgt. Orkobi was a 20
year-old female who was on her first day of active duty with the
Israeli Defense Forces. But this part of the story never reached the
USA. Nor can we find a disclosure as to how many of the 120 wounded
were military. As usual, the IMFA did not disclose those who were in
the active reserves but not on duty at the time of death...

But because military were killed and possibly wounded, no one can
conclude they targeted civilians. In all but a few sacrifice bombings
military are killed or wounded. The IMFA had two reasons for keeping
Sergeant Orkobi's name out of the print. They can garner sympathy for
their air raids if the American public believes the sacrifice bombers
are targeting civilians only. Israel kills Palestinian civilians by
the dozens and do not even bother to apologize.

The second reason Israel keeps Sergeant Orkobi's name out of
American's minds is that most do not know that Israeli's draft their
girls and puts them in harms way. If American Christians knew about
the mistreatment of Israeli women, including the use of Military-paid
abortion as a birth control method, many would wonder about their
unquestioned support of the Israeli war machine.

Christian Israeli Patriots such as Pat Robertson, Franklin Graham and
Jerry Falwell, who Ariel Sharon calls the Christian Zionists, might be
embarrassed to explain their undying devotion to a regime which drafts
women into combat, marches them hip to hip with men, and provides free
abortions for the resulting problems. Some might wake up and actually
wonder if boys and girls are conditioned to kill and torture
Palestinian including children. Israel and a complicit US Media solve
these twin problems by doctoring press releases with false statements
that omit the loss of military personnel in guerilla raids. Female
names are never associated with the military even though they make up
about 1/3 of the total draftees.

("Suicide bomber:" Suicide is the act of taking ones one life for the
purpose of ending it. Sacrifice bombers have never been shown to have
a desire to stop living; their motive is to find and destroy enemy
personal regardless of the cost. Thus the term "sacrifice bombers" is
more accurate in describing them. The former is an Israeli propaganda
label.)

We Hold These Truths (http://www.whtt.org)
P.O. Box 14491 Scottsdale, AZ
85267 480-947-3329

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com

Stan De SD
2011-09-18 15:07:09 EST
On Sep 18, 3:07 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> ("Suicide bomber:" Suicide is the act of taking ones one life for the
> purpose of ending it. Sacrifice bombers have never been shown to have
> a desire to stop living; their motive is to find and destroy enemy
> personal regardless of the cost. Thus the term "sacrifice bombers" is
> more accurate in describing them. The former is an Israeli propaganda
> label.)

So you admit that you support murderers and terrorists. Not that we
didn't know that already...

Stan De SD
2011-09-18 15:14:46 EST
On Sep 15, 3:28 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Oakland Museum Cancels Palestinian Kids' War Art
> San Francisco Chroniclehttp://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/09/09/BA921L2H5...
>
> An Oakland children's museum, citing pressure from the community,
> canceled a planned exhibit of artwork by Palestinian youth that
> depicted the Israeli assault during the 2008-09 Gaza conflict. The
> Museum of Children's Art was scheduled to display the art from Sept.
> 24 to Nov. 13. The exhibit had been in the works for several months,
> with an opening reception to feature poetry and special art activities
> for children. The drawings in the exhibit were created by children
> ranging in age from about 9 to 11 and included bombs dropping, tanks
> and people getting shot ...

Most likely they determined that this was more of an orchestrated
propaganda attempt than any balanced or objective view of the
conflict, and therefore not appropriate for display. Even many of the
liberal progressives who might otherwise have sympathy for the plight
of individual innocent Palestinians get a little uncomfortable with
some of the hatred and rage that pours out of people who have been fed
anti-Jewish propaganda by their leaders from the day they were born.
Good call to shut this one down...

Topaz
2011-09-19 16:16:51 EST

On Wednesday, March 6th, Ha'aretz, the prominent Israeli newspaper,
reported that "15 people" were killed the previous afternoon in
a "suicide" bus bombing in Haifa. The names of the killed and wounded
were not disclosed for more than 24 hours, but personal details about
the bomber were released immediately. According to Ha'aretz he
was "Mahmoud Amadan Salim Kawasme, 20, a computer student from Hebron
Polytechnic Institute. A letter was found on his body that included
quotations from the Koran. Kawasme is the 20th student from this
college to carry out attacks against Israeli targets since the
beginning of the Intifada."(2)

Most readers worldwide were told only a half-truth, that the bomber
was a 20 year-old Arab Muslim who deliberately murders innocent
civilians. George W. Bush poured glue on the lie by condemning the
act as "terrorism against the innocent." We want to assume our
President tells the whole truth, but he did not.

THE TRUTH COMES OUT OVERNIGHT:

The MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS standard practice is to wait for the
glue holding the lie together to set before bleeding out the names
and ranks of those killed, that way most people never know if
military are among those killed.

It was later announce that at least two of those killed were IDF
(Israeli Army) active duty personnel. Another may have been in the
military or the reserves. Unfortunately there were civilian
casualties, but the bombing must be viewed as aimed at Army
personnel. Why? Because it must be assumed that the soldiers hit
were the targets picked. This is the nature of war. Those near
soldiers are at risk.

In the first 65 days of 2003, Israel's military has killed no less
then 150 Palestinians, almost every one a civilians, and most were
killed inside their own homes. About half of those killed were
children.

In the entire history of the 12-year Intifada, approximately 66
Israelis children (under military age) have been killed by all
Palestinian attacks, including this Haifa bus #37 in which eight
teenagers were killed. This figure is compiled by examining public
records provided by the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Israel's military has killed more Palestinian children in just the
last TWO MONTHS than the Palestinian have killed in 10 years! Who
then are the child killers?

Five of the eight teenagers killed in the explosion were within one
year of military age, which is 18 in Israel, and most were only three
or four years younger than the bomber. These students eventually
must all serve in the Israeli army.

One can only wonder how many of those 50 who were reported wounded
may also be active duty military, or are in the huge reserve forces.
The Palestinian attack on Haifa bus #37 was no more or less than a
search and destroy mission carried out by a volunteer militia against
and illegally oppressor. In some bus bombings 75% or more of those
killed were military. Yes, there was significant "collateral
damage." But our leaders make no apology for the civilian deaths will
that will come in Iraq.

The loss of any life is always tragic. Israelis are human, and so
are the Palestinians. WHTT is a pro-life organization. We also
grieve for the family of the 20 year old who blew himself up in this
mission against those military persons whom he considered his
oppressors.

By now the Israeli Defense Force will probably have found Mohamoud's
family and destroyed their home, and perhaps their neighbors' homes,
perhaps killing many more. Within 24 hour of this Mohamoud's mission
the IDF had killed 10 Gaza residents and wounded more than a hundred,
many of who will probably not survive, in an Apache Helicopter rocket
attack into upon a street crowd of civilians in Gaza. Mahmoud was
not from Gaza.

Where do you place the blame for this violence? When our president
labeled Mahmoud a terrorist he placed a target on the student's
family, and on anyone upon whom the Israelis chose to take
retribution. A little lie brings big death; why can't our leader
tell the truth about the little details?

Endnotes:
(1)Haaretz death report:
(<http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml>?
itemNo=269940&contrassID=1&subContrassID=5&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y
)

(2.) <http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/269513.html>
Haaretz reported the following military persons killed on the bus #37

"Barry Oved, 21, from Rosh Pina .... Barry was to have been RELEASED
FROM THE ARMY IN ABOUT FIVE MONTHS.... He will be laid to rest at 4
P.M. on Thursday at the MILITARY SECTION of the Rosh Pina cemetery."
(Note the admission of his military service, but his rank is not
given. If one did not read carefully he could be taken for a
civilian.)

"Mitel Katav, 20, from Haifa... WAS RELEASED FROM MILITARY SERVICE
just over a month ago... Her uncle, Karmi Katav, said 'she was a
sweet and smiling child".... He added that Mitel's father had five
children and would get up at 5:30 A.M. TO TAKE HER TO THE BUS STATION
ON HER WAY TO THE ARMY BASE."

"Staff Sergeant Eliahu Lacham, 22, from Haifa"
"ELIAHU LACHAM WILL BE LAID TO REST AT 9 P.M. ON THURSDAY AT MILITARY
CEMETERY IN HAIFA."

[The release does not disclose the names of wounded, nor if Mitel or
others on the bus are in the active military reserve, as are most
Israelis over 21 years old, but it does reveal that the military
travel on public buses in Israel. Editor observed this to be fact on
every bus he saw or rode. There can be doubt that public buses in
Israel are military targets. Mitel was female soldier, a facts is
rarely admitted to Americans when Israelis are killed.]

WHTT has produced several first hand reports proving why buses are
military targets in Israel and why the press has lied about it. See
LIAR, LIAR! THE ISRAELI MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS by
C. E. Carlson (<http://www.whtt.org/articles/020621.htm>)



http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com

Topaz
2011-09-19 16:18:09 EST
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:14:46 -0700 (PDT), Stan de SD
<*d@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sep 15, 3:28 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Oakland Museum Cancels Palestinian Kids' War Art
>> San Francisco Chroniclehttp://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/09/09/BA921L2H5...
>>
>> An Oakland children's museum, citing pressure from the community,
>> canceled a planned exhibit of artwork by Palestinian youth that
>> depicted the Israeli assault during the 2008-09 Gaza conflict. The
>> Museum of Children's Art was scheduled to display the art from Sept.
>> 24 to Nov. 13. The exhibit had been in the works for several months,
>> with an opening reception to feature poetry and special art activities
>> for children. The drawings in the exhibit were created by children
>> ranging in age from about 9 to 11 and included bombs dropping, tanks
>> and people getting shot ...
>
>Most likely they determined that this was more of an orchestrated
>propaganda attempt than any balanced or objective view of the
>conflict, and therefore not appropriate for display. Even many of the
>liberal progressives who might otherwise have sympathy for the plight
>of individual innocent Palestinians get a little uncomfortable with
>some of the hatred and rage that pours out of people who have been fed
>anti-Jewish propaganda by their leaders from the day they were born.
>Good call to shut this one down...


By Dr. Hanan Ashrawi

"Israeli tanks and armored vehicles are surrounding Palestinian
villages, camps and cities (and not the other way around).

Israeli (American made) Apache gun ships are firing Lau and other
missiles at Palestinian protestors and homes (and not the other way
around).

It is Israel that is confiscating Palestinian land and importing
Jewish settlers to set up illegal armed settlements in the heart of
Palestinian territory (and not the other way around).

The settlers on the rampage in the West Bank are Israelis terrorizing
Palestinians in their own homes (and not the other way around).

The homes that are being demolished at the hands of the Israelis are
Palestinian homes (and not the other way around).

The armed soldiers and Special Forces at checkpoints throughout
Palestine are Israeli (and not the other way around).

The more than a hundred murdered civilians and thousands of injured
are all Palestinians being shot by Israeli occupation troops (and not
the other way around).

It is Israel that has closed down the Palestinian airport at Gaza
thereby preventing badly needed medical supplies from reaching the
Palestinians (and not the other way around).

The crossing points to and from Palestine as well as entrances and
exits to and from all Palestinian inhabited areas are manned and
controlled by Israeli soldiers who have completely prevented all
freedom of movement (and not the other way around)."


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Page: 1   (First | Last)


2021 - UsenetArchives.com | Contact Us | Privacy | Stats | Site Search
Become our Patron