The most annoying thing about the USA is affirmative action. This means that women and Black people get the jobs and scholarships even if the White man is more qualified. America is founded on the idea that the White man is to blame for everything bad. And every time women or Black people get to be president or whatever it's called a great achievement. This is known as political correctness or PC for short.
The problem with the schools is that they are PC. But the Jews and their minions cleverly twist it so that "Socialism" is the problem and not PC. Communism may of course be trash but so is Capitalism. Here is a quote from Mein Kampf:
"the Jew seized upon the manifold possibilities which the situation offered him for the future. While on the one hand he organized capitalistic methods of exploitation to their ultimate degree of efficiency, he curried favour with the victims of his policy and his power and in a short while became the leader of their struggle against himself. 'Against himself' is here only a figurative way of speaking; for this 'Great Master of Lies' knows how to appear in the guise of the innocent and throw the guilt on others. Since he had the impudence to take a personal lead among the masses, they never for a moment suspected that they were falling prey to one of the most infamous deceits ever practiced. And yet that is what it actually was."
2012-12-28 13:02:17 EST
"Topaz" <email@example.com> wrote in message news:firstname.lastname@example.org... > > The most annoying thing about the USA is affirmative action. This > means that women and Black people get the jobs and scholarships even > if the White man is more qualified. America is founded on the idea > that the White man is to blame for everything bad. And every time > women or Black people get to be president or whatever it's called a > great achievement. This is known as political correctness or PC for > short.
I don't like it either, but after over a century of racially-based discrimination and injustice, one can expect the pendulum to swing the other way.
2012-12-28 18:00:15 EST
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:02:17 -0500, "Freedom Man" <*email@example.com> wrote:
>> The most annoying thing about the USA is affirmative action. This >> means that women and Black people get the jobs and scholarships even >> if the White man is more qualified. America is founded on the idea >> that the White man is to blame for everything bad. And every time >> women or Black people get to be president or whatever it's called a >> great achievement. This is known as political correctness or PC for >> short. > >I don't like it either, but after over a century of racially-based >discrimination and injustice, one can expect the pendulum to swing the other >way. >
This is the reason we must tell the facts about racial differences. The reason Blacks were and are less prosperous than Whites, is not because Whites are oppressing them, but because they are on average less intelligent than Whites.
The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict. It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the people in India.
All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.
"Topaz" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message news:email@example.com... > On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:02:17 -0500, "Freedom Man" > <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > >>> The most annoying thing about the USA is affirmative action. This >>> means that women and Black people get the jobs and scholarships even >>> if the White man is more qualified. America is founded on the idea >>> that the White man is to blame for everything bad. And every time >>> women or Black people get to be president or whatever it's called a >>> great achievement. This is known as political correctness or PC for >>> short. >> >>I don't like it either, but after over a century of racially-based >>discrimination and injustice, one can expect the pendulum to swing the >>other >>way. > > This is the reason we must tell the facts about racial differences. > The reason Blacks were and are less prosperous than Whites, is not > because Whites are oppressing them, but because they are on average > less intelligent than Whites.
I suppose that so many years of oppression under slavery and what followed - being denied equal educational opportunities - has nothing to do with their claimed lack of intelligence?
> The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black > nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second > world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict. > It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than > the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the > people in India.
There is a genetic connection between skin color and intelligence? Where is the proof of this?
> All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more > intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything > important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on > the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses > are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.
Yes, whites score higher on tests created BY whites for those with "white" cultural backgrounds and education. Even if non-whites on the average have a lower intelligence, this DOES NOT justify any form of discimination or opportunity denial against non-whites that DO have the requisite intelligence. Why do you insist on dwelling on the past race on race warfare, when the HUMAN race could be better served by cooperation and equal opportunities for all?
2012-12-30 05:43:49 EST
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:54:11 -0500, "Freedom Man" <*email@example.com> wrote:
>I suppose that so many years of oppression under slavery and what followed - >being denied equal educational opportunities - has nothing to do with their >claimed lack of intelligence?
Slaves in America didn't stop the rest of the Blacks in Africa from building universities. And the Blacks were educated after slavery. They just had separate schools.
>There is a genetic connection between skin color and intelligence? >Where is the proof of this?
It happens to be the case. Assuming homo sapiens originated in Africa, the ones who traveled north became more evolved, because they needed more intelligence to survive the winters. Clearly their skin color also became lighter.
>Yes, whites score higher on tests created BY whites for those with "white" >cultural backgrounds and education.
IQ test are designed specifically to rule out cultural backgrounds and education.
>Even if non-whites on the average have a lower intelligence, this DOES NOT >justify any form of discimination or opportunity denial against non-whites >that DO have the requisite intelligence.
We should preserve the White race by having a nation for White people.
>Why do you insist on dwelling on the past race on race warfare,
I don't like race warfare.
"Precisely because we are nationally minded, for that very reason we have respect for the national feelings of other peoples. And our national pride does not mean we scorn other peoples, it means that we respect and love our own people. It is precisely the Internationalists who prevent peoples from coming to understand one another." Adolf Hitler
"Not hatred toward other peoples, but love toward the German nation." Hitler, Berlin October 24, 1933
General Leon Degrelle was the leader of the Belgian contingent of the Waffen SS. He was in 75 hand-to-hand combat actions against the Marxists. This is what he wrote: "German racialism has been deliberately distorted. It never was "anti-other race"... National Socialist racialism was not against the other races, it was for its own race. It aimed at defending and improving its race and wished that all other races did the same for themselves. It was demonstrated when the Waffen SS enlarged its ranks to include 60,000 Islamic SS troops. The Waffen SS respected their way of life, their customs and their religious beliefs. Each Islamic SS battalion had an iman; each company had a mullah. It was our common wish that their qualities found their highest expression... I was present when each of my Islamic comrades received a personal gift from Hitler during the new year. It was a pendant with a small Koran. He was honouring them with what was the most important aspect of their lives and their history."
> when the >HUMAN race could be better served by cooperation and equal opportunities for >all?
The human race is better served by preserving the subset that is White.
Thank White people for:
- that computer you're typing on - the software that drives it - recorded music - motion pictures - tv - radio - camera - telephone - light bulb - the automobile - rocketry - satellites - spacecraft - airplanes - skyscrapers - metallurgy (most discoveries) - materials science (plastics, compounds, & most other synthetics) - 95% of medical advancements - 95% of life saving pharmaceutical drugs - most scientific breakthroughs over the past 1000 years - the bulk of mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology - discovery of DNA - laser technology and it's myriad of uses - harnessing electricity - nuclear energy - wireless technology - air conditioning devices - refrigeration - modern agricultural techniques
Where would the world be without White people? Stuck in the stone age, that's where.
So the next time you get in your car, pick up your cell phone, fly a plane, etc. thank White people.
"Topaz" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message news:email@example.com... > On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:54:11 -0500, "Freedom Man" > <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > >>I suppose that so many years of oppression under slavery and what >>followed - >>being denied equal educational opportunities - has nothing to do with >>their >>claimed lack of intelligence? > > Slaves in America didn't stop the rest of the Blacks in Africa from > building universities. And the Blacks were educated after slavery. > They just had separate schools.
Very INFERIOR schools!
>>There is a genetic connection between skin color and intelligence? >>Where is the proof of this? > > It happens to be the case. Assuming homo sapiens originated in Africa, > the ones who traveled north became more evolved, because they needed > more intelligence to survive the winters. Clearly their skin color > also became lighter.
That is opinion, not proof.
>>Yes, whites score higher on tests created BY whites for those with "white" >>cultural backgrounds and education. > > IQ test are designed specifically to rule out cultural backgrounds and > education. > >>Even if non-whites on the average have a lower intelligence, this DOES NOT >>justify any form of discimination or opportunity denial against non-whites >>that DO have the requisite intelligence. > > We should preserve the White race by having a nation for White people.
There is no nation exclusively for any other "racial" category of people, so why one for Whites only? This would not reflect well on the mindset of we Whites.
>>Why do you insist on dwelling on the past race on race warfare, > > I don't like race warfare.
But your rhetoric and support for Nazism promotes it.
> "Precisely because we are nationally minded, for that very reason we > have respect for the national feelings of other peoples. And our > national pride does not mean we scorn other peoples, it means that we > respect and love our own people. It is precisely the Internationalists > who prevent peoples from coming to understand one another." > Adolf Hitler
Hitler was a vicious autocrat; a fascist. I oppose that form of governance, as freedom is precious to me.
> "Not hatred toward other peoples, but love toward the German nation." > Hitler, Berlin October 24, 1933 > > General Leon Degrelle was the leader of the Belgian contingent of the > Waffen SS. He was in 75 hand-to-hand combat actions against the > Marxists. This is what he wrote: > "German racialism has been deliberately distorted. It never was > "anti-other race"... National Socialist racialism was not against the > other races, it was for its own race. It aimed at defending and > improving its race and wished that all other races did the same for > themselves. It was demonstrated when the Waffen SS enlarged its ranks > to include 60,000 Islamic SS troops. > The Waffen SS respected their way of life, their customs and their > religious beliefs. Each Islamic SS battalion had an iman; each company > had a mullah. It was our common wish that their qualities found their > highest expression... I was present when each of my Islamic comrades > received a personal gift from Hitler during the new year. It was a > pendant with a small Koran. He was honouring them with what was the > most important aspect of their lives and their history." > >> when the >>HUMAN race could be better served by cooperation and equal opportunities >>for >>all? > > The human race is better served by preserving the subset that is > White. > > Thank White people for: > > - that computer you're typing on > - the software that drives it > - recorded music > - motion pictures > - tv > - radio > - camera > - telephone > - light bulb > - the automobile > - rocketry > - satellites > - spacecraft > - airplanes > - skyscrapers > - metallurgy (most discoveries) > - materials science (plastics, compounds, & most other synthetics) > - 95% of medical advancements > - 95% of life saving pharmaceutical drugs > - most scientific breakthroughs over the past 1000 years > - the bulk of mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology > - discovery of DNA > - laser technology and it's myriad of uses > - harnessing electricity > - nuclear energy > - wireless technology > - air conditioning devices > - refrigeration > - modern agricultural techniques > > Where would the world be without White people? Stuck in the stone > age, that's where.
You of course omit any reference to the achievements of non-whites, including their contributions to those you listed above.
> So the next time you get in your car, pick up your cell phone, fly a > plane, etc. thank White people. > > jimj
2012-12-31 17:07:34 EST
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:22:39 -0500, "Freedom Man" <*email@example.com> wrote:
>Very INFERIOR schools!
So you say. Of course you get ideas like that from the Jewish controlled media.
>That is opinion, not proof.
>There is no nation exclusively for any other "racial" category of people, so >why one for Whites only? >This would not reflect well on the mindset of we Whites.
No one is shocked if the vast majority of people in China are Chinese. That goes for every other race except Whites. Only the White race is slated for destruction according to the Jews plan.
>But your rhetoric and support for Nazism promotes it.
By Shaun Walker.
The point is that all we actually seek is White self-determination in our own territory, like every other race. How much more reasonable can that be? No one questions the self-determination Indians have on their reservations. No one questions the right to self-determination for the Eskimos (Inuit) in the far North of Canada. Hell no. The Canadian government has even passed laws to grant the Eskimos control over a vast expanse of territory which the non-Whites claimed. This model exists throughout the world: everywhere you go, you will find assorted non-White races and groups all successfully claiming their right to self determination, all with the support of the liberals and even other non-Whites. The Palestinians are a case in point. Most politically-prominent Negroes in America support the Palestinians having a separate state, and object to the Palestinians being ruled by the Zionist Jewish state. And rightly so. In this demand, they are joined by the White extreme left-wing of the political spectrum. Yet, you will not find one of these White extremist left-wingers supporting the concept of a territory for White people in which they can have self-determination. Liberal hypocrisy is as boundless as time. If we, or anyone else who supports White self-determination, raises the issue of White separatism with any of these non-White groups, or the left-wingers of any race, we are dismissed as "White supremacists" or "haters" or what-ever word they like to use at that moment in time. But honestly, we don't care much about what they call us. We know what we need, and we work day and night to achieve it. Why should we be ashamed of being White? On the contrary, we are proud of our race, the race that has produced every single great scientific innovation on the planet. Our race has produced all the greatest works of art, and it is our aesthetic norms that dominate the entire world...
White nationalists who look at this fact closely, can quickly become discouraged and come to the conclusion that White separatist activity is pointless. But they are forgetting an important message given to us by our founder, Dr. William Pierce. He told us, in no uncertain terms, that when we work for our new society, we should not be discouraged by what we see around us. We work, Dr. Pierce said, not for what it is now - otherwise we would be conservatives - but rather we work for what can be. Dr. Pierce used the analogy of a garden, overrun with weeds. A gardener, who sees only weeds, might give up without even trying. A visionary, who sees the blades of grass and roses lying half submerged in the weeds, and who conceptualizes a grand garden, free of weeds and sprouting new life, the re-growth of Nature's glory, is the true carrier of our racial renewal and the rebirth of our Aryan Folk. No, we are not conservatives who seek to preserve the existing order. To hell with the existing order - it is corrupt, decadent, and must fall. We don't want to preserve the obviously failed, existing social construct; we wish to see a new society, in which merit and merit alone determines political leadership, not with how the current establishment promotes the best liars to the top. We do not seek to maintain the existing raceless order, or to go back to the days of segregation. We know and understand fully that segregation, as well-intentioned as it might have been, was a recipe for disaster. We don't seek to rule over anybody but ourselves, and we need racial separation in our own areas, and not segregation within a joint area. That is the only solution. No sir, conservatives we are not. We are revolutionaries in the true sense of the word: we seek to remodel the world in a new image, to cast down the lies and racial treason of the old order, and to return to the eternal laws of race as our guiding light. Only with the full understanding of race, acceptance of racial differences and geographic separation, can we avoid racial conflict. Yes, you heard me correctly: we seek a world without racial conflict, where each race is free to achieve whatever it may, within its own space, without interference from outside. This goal is really this ironic, to the extreme that the solution to the racial problem which we seek, is in fact the only manner in which the racial harmony which the liberals so desperately desire, can be achieved. We know and understand this eternal truth. Birds of a feather flock together, as should you and I. We have our goal clearly laid out in front of us. We are resolute in our intention to see the flowering garden of our glorious race instead of the Jew-ridden, race-mixed weed patch, and we work unceasingly for our goal.
>Hitler was a vicious autocrat; a fascist. I oppose that form of governance, >as freedom is precious to me.
The Jews control your media.
ADOLF HITLER SCHWERIN, GUSTLOFF'S FUNERAL SPEECH OF FEBRUARY 12, 1936
. . . BEHIND every murder stood the same power which is responsible for this murder; behind these harmless insignificant fellow-countrymen who were instigated and incited to crime stands the hate-filled power of our Jewish foe, a foe to whom we had done no harm, but who none the less sought to subjugate our German people and make of it its slave - the foe who is responsible for all the misfortune that fell upon us in 1918, for all the misfortune which plagued Germany in the years that followed. Those members of the Party and honorable comrades of ours all fell, and the same fate was planned for others: many hundreds survived as cripples or severely wounded, blinded or lamed; more than 40,000 others were injured. And among them were so many loyal folk whom we all knew and who were near and dear to us, of whom we were sure that they could never do any harm to anyone, that they had never done any harm to anyone, whose only crime was that they devoted themselves to the cause of Germany.
In the ranks of those whose lives were thus sacrificed there stood also Horst Wessel, the singer who gave to the Movement its song, never dreaming that he would join those spirits who march and have marched with us.
And now on foreign soil National Socialism has gained its first conscious martyr - a man who did nothing save to enter the lists for Germany which is not only his sacred right but his duty in this world: a man who did nothing save remember his homeland and pledge himself to her in loyalty. He, too, was murdered, just like so many others. Even at the time when on January 30 three years ago we had come into power, precisely the same things happened in Germany, at Frankfort on the Oder, at Köpenick, and again at Brunswick. The procedure was always the same: a few men come and call someone out of his house and then stab or shoot him down.
That is no chance: it is the same guiding hand which organized these crimes and purposes to do so again. Now for the first time one who is responsible for these acts has appeared in his own person. For the first time he employs no harmless German fellow-countryman. It is a title to fame for Switzerland, as it is for our own Germans in Switzerland, that no one let himself be hired to do this deed so that for the first time the spiritual begetter of the act must himself perform the act. So our comrade has fallen a victim to that power which wages a fanatical warfare not only against our German people but against every free, autonomous, and independent people. We understand the challenge to battle and we take up the gage! My dear comrade! You have not fallen in vain!
>You of course omit any reference to the achievements of non-whites, >including their contributions to those you listed above. >
"Black Invention Myths
Perhaps you've heard the claims: Were it not for the genius and energy of African-American inventors, we might find ourselves in a world without traffic lights, peanut butter, blood banks, light bulb filaments, and a vast number of other things we now take for granted but could hardly imagine life without.
Such beliefs usually originate in books or articles about black history. Since many of the authors have little interest in the history of technology outside of advertising black contributions to it, their stories tend to be fraught with misunderstandings, wishful thinking, or fanciful embellishments with no historical basis. The lack of historical perspective leads to extravagant overestimations of originality and importance: sometimes a slightly modified version of a pre-existing piece of technology is mistaken for the first invention of its type; sometimes a patent or innovation with little or no lasting value is portrayed as a major advance, even if there's no real evidence it was ever used.
Unfortunately, some of the errors and exaggerations have acquired an illusion of credibility by repetition in mainstream outlets, especially during Black History Month (see examples for the traffic light and ironing board). When myths go unchallenged for too long, they begin to eclipse the truth. Thus I decided to put some records straight. Although this page does not cover every dubious invention claim floating around out there, it should at least serve as a warning never to take any such claim for granted. Each item below is listed with its supposed black originator beneath it along with the year it was supposedly invented, followed by something about the real origin of the invention or at least an earlier instance of it.
Invented by Garrett A. Morgan in 1923? No!
The first known traffic signal appeared in London in 1868 near the Houses of Parliament. Designed by JP Knight, it featured two semaphore arms and two gas lamps. The earliest electric traffic lights include Lester Wire's two-color version set up in Salt Lake City circa 1912, James Hoge's system (US patent #1,251,666) installed in Cleveland by the American Traffic Signal Company in 1914, and William Potts' 4-way red-yellow-green lights introduced in Detroit beginning in 1920. New York City traffic towers began flashing three-color signals also in 1920. Garrett Morgan's cross-shaped, crank-operated semaphore was not among the first half-hundred patented traffic signals, nor was it "automatic" as is sometimes claimed, nor did it play any part in the evolution of the modern traffic light. For details see Inventing History: Garrett Morgan and the Traffic Signal.
Garrett Morgan in 1914? No!
The invention of the gas mask predates Morgan's breathing device by several decades. Early versions were constructed by the Scottish chemist John Stenhouse in 1854 and the physicist John Tyndall in the 1870s, among many other inventors prior to World War I. See The Invention of the Gas Mask.
George Washington Carver (who began his peanut research in 1903)? No! Peanuts, which are native to the New World tropics, were mashed into paste by Aztecs hundreds of years ago. Evidence of modern peanut butter comes from US patent #306727 issued to Marcellus Gilmore Edson of Montreal, Quebec in 1884, for a process of milling roasted peanuts between heated surfaces until the peanuts reached "a fluid or semi-fluid state." As the product cooled, it set into what Edson described as "a consistency like that of butter, lard, or ointment." In 1890, George A. Bayle Jr., owner of a food business in St. Louis, manufactured peanut butter and sold it out of barrels. J.H. Kellogg, of cereal fame, secured US patent #580787 in 1897 for his "Process of Preparing Nutmeal," which produced a "pasty adhesive substance" that Kellogg called "nut-butter."
George Washington Carver "Discovered" hundreds of new and important uses for the peanut? Fathered the peanut industry? Revolutionized southern US agriculture? No! Research by Barry Mackintosh, who served as bureau historian for the National Park Service (which manages the G.W. Carver National Monument), demonstrated the following: a.. Most of Carver's peanut and sweet potato creations were either unoriginal, impractical, or of uncertain effectiveness. No product born in his laboratory was widely adopted. b.. The boom years for Southern peanut production came prior to, and not as a result of, Carver's promotion of the crop. c.. Carver's work to improve regional farming practices was not of pioneering scientific importance and had little demonstrable impact. To see how Carver gained "a popular reputation far transcending the significance of his accomplishments," read Mackintosh's excellent article George Washington Carver: The Making of a Myth. Automatic Lubricator, "Real McCoy" Elijah McCoy revolutionized industry in 1872 by inventing the first device to automatically oil machinery? No! The phrase "Real McCoy" arose to distinguish Elijah's inventions from cheap imitations? No! The oil cup, which automatically delivers a steady trickle of lubricant to machine parts while the machine is running, predates McCoy's career; a description of one appears in the May 6, 1848 issue of Scientific American. The automatic "displacement lubricator" for steam engines was developed in 1860 by John Ramsbottom of England, and notably improved in 1862 by James Roscoe of the same country. The "hydrostatic" lubricator originated no later than 1871. Variants of the phrase Real McCoy appear in Scottish literature dating back to at least 1856 - well before Elijah McCoy could have been involved. Detailed evidence: The not-so-real McCoy Also see The Fake McCoy and Did Somebody Say McTrash?
Dr. Charles Drew in 1940? No!
During World War I, Dr. Oswald H. Robertson of the US army preserved blood in a citrate-glucose solution and stored it in cooled containers for later transfusion. This was the first use of "banked" blood. By the mid-1930s the Russians had set up a national network of facilities for the collection, typing, and storage of blood. Bernard Fantus, influenced by the Russian program, established the first hospital blood bank in the United States at Chicago's Cook County Hospital in 1937. It was Fantus who coined the term "blood bank." See highlights of transfusion history from the American Association of Blood Banks.
Did Charles Drew "discover" (in about 1940) that plasma could be separated and stored apart from the rest of the blood, thereby revolutionizing transfusion medicine? No! The possibility of using blood plasma for transfusion purposes was known at least since 1918, when English physician Gordon R. Ward suggested it in a medical journal. In the mid-1930s, John Elliott advanced the idea, emphasizing plasma's advantages in shelf life and donor-recipient compatibility, and in 1939 he and two colleagues reported having used stored plasma in 191 transfusions. (See historical notes on plasma use.) Charles Drew was not responsible for any breakthrough scientific or medical discovery; his main career achievement lay in supervising or co-supervising major programs for the collection and shipment of blood and plasma. More: Charles Drew Mythology Washington DC city plan Benjamin Banneker? No!
Pierre-Charles L'Enfant created the layout of Washington DC. Banneker assisted Andrew Ellicott in the survey of the federal territory, but played no direct role in the actual planning of the city. The story of Banneker reconstructing the city design from memory after L'Enfant ran away with the plans (with the implication that the project would have failed if not for Banneker) has been debunked by historians.
Filament for Light Bulb
Lewis Latimer invented the carbon filament in 1881 or 1882? No! English chemist/physicist Joseph Swan experimented with a carbon-filament incandescent light all the way back in 1860, and by 1878 had developed a better design which he patented in Britain. On the other side of the Atlantic, Thomas Edison developed a successful carbon-filament bulb, receiving a patent for it (#223898) in January 1880, before Lewis Latimer did any work in electric lighting. From 1880 onward, countless patents were issued for innovations in filament design and manufacture (Edison had over 50 of them). Neither of Latimer's two filament-related patents in 1881 and 1882 were among the most important innovations, nor did they make the light bulb last longer, nor is there reason to believe they were adopted outside Hiram Maxim's company where Latimer worked at the time. (He was not hired by Edison's company until 1884, primarily as a draftsman and an expert witness in patent litigations). Latimer also did not come up with the first screw socket for the light bulb or the first book on electric lighting.
Heart Surgery (first successful)
Dr. Daniel Hale Williams in 1893? No!
Dr. Williams repaired a wound not in the heart muscle itself, but in the sac surrounding it, the pericardium. This operation was not the first of its type: Henry Dalton of St. Louis performed a nearly identical operation two years earlier, with the patient fully recovering. Decades before that, the Spaniard Francisco Romero carried out the first successful pericardial surgery of any type, incising the pericardium to drain fluid compressing the heart. Surgery on the actual human heart muscle, and not just the pericardium, was first successfully accomplished by Ludwig Rehn of Germany when he repaired a wounded right ventricle in 1896. More than 50 years later came surgery on the open heart, pioneered by John Lewis, C. Walton Lillehei (often called the "father of open heart surgery") and John Gibbon (who invented the heart-lung machine). What medical historians say... "Third Rail" Granville Woods in 1901? No!
Werner von Siemens pioneered the use of an electrified third rail as a means for powering railway vehicles when he demonstrated an experimental electric train at the 1879 Berlin Industrial Exhibition. In the US, English-born Leo Daft used a third-rail system to electrify the Baltimore & Hampden lines in 1885. The first electrically powered subway trains, which debuted in London in the autumn of 1890, likewise drew power from a third rail. Details...
Granville Woods prevented railway accidents and saved countless lives by inventing the train telegraph (patented in 1887), which allowed communication to and from moving trains? No! The earliest patents for train telegraphs go back to at least 1873. Lucius Phelps was the first inventor in the field to attract widespread notice, and the telegrams he exchanged on the New York, New Haven & Hartford railroad in January 1885 were hailed in the Feb. 21, 1885 issue of Scientific American as "perhaps the first ever sent to and from a moving train." Phelps remained at the forefront in developing the technology and by the end of 1887 already held 14 US patents on his system. He joined a team led by Thomas Edison, who had been working on his "grasshopper telegraph" for trains, and together they constructed on the Lehigh Valley Railroad one of the only induction telegraph systems ever put to commercial use. Although this telegraph was a technical success, it fulfilled no public need, and the market for on-board train telegraphy never took off. There is no evidence that any commercial railway telegraph based on Granville Woods's patents was ever built. About the patent interference case
Frederick Jones (with Joseph Numero) in 1938? No! Did Jones change America's eating habits by making possible the long-distance shipment of perishable foods? No!
Refrigerated ships and railcars had been moving perishables across oceans and continents even before Jones was born (see refrigerated transport timeline). Trucks with mechanically refrigerated cargo spaces appeared on the roads at least as early as the late 1920s (see the proof). Further development of truck refrigeration was more a process of gradual evolution than radical change.
Air Brake / Automatic Air Brake
Granville Woods in 1904? No!
In 1869, a 22-year-old George Westinghouse received US patent #88929 for a brake device operated by compressed air, and in the same year organized the Westinghouse Air Brake Company. Many of the 361 patents he accumulated during his career were for air brake variations and improvements, including his first "automatic" version in 1872 (US #124404).
Frederick Jones in 1949? No!
Dr. Willis Carrier built the first machine to control both the temperature and humidity of indoor air. He received the first of many patents in 1906 (US patent #808897, for the "Apparatus for Treating Air"). In 1911 he published the formulae that became the scientific basis for air conditioning design, and four years later formed the Carrier Engineering Corporation to develop and manufacture AC systems.
J.F. Pickering in 1900? No! French engineer Henri Giffard successfully flew a powered navigable airship in 1852. The La France airship built by Charles Renard and Arthur Krebs in 1884 featured an electric motor and improved steering capabilities. In 1900 Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin's first rigid-framed dirigible took to the air. Of the hundreds of inventors granted patents for early airship designs and modifications, few succeeded in building or flying their craft. There doesn't appear to be any record of a "Pickering Airship" ever getting off the ground. US Aviation Patent Database, 1799-1909
Automatic Railroad Car Coupler
Andrew Beard invented the "Jenny [sic] coupler" in 1897? No! The Janney coupler is named for US Civil War veteran Eli H. Janney, who in 1873 invented a device (US patent #138405) which automatically linked together two railroad cars upon their being brought into contact. Also known as the "knuckle coupler," Janney's invention superseded the dangerous link-and-pin coupler and became the basis for standard coupler design through the remainder of the millennium. Andrew Beard's modified knuckle coupler was just one of approximately eight thousand coupler variations patented by 1900. See a history of the automatic coupler and also The Janney Coupler.
Richard Spikes in 1932? No!
The first automatic-transmission automobile to enter the market was designed by the Sturtevant brothers of Massachusetts in 1904. US Patent #766551 was the first of several patents on their gearshift mechanism. Automatic transmission technology continued to develop, spawning hundreds of patents and numerous experimental units; but because of cost, reliability issues and an initial lack of demand, several decades passed before vehicles with automatic transmission became common on the roads.
Isaac R. Johnson in 1899? No!
Comte Mede de Sivrac and Karl von Sauerbronn built primitive versions of the bicycle in 1791 and 1816 respectively. The frame of John Starley's 1885 "safety bicycle" resembled that of a modern bicycle.
Henry T. Sampson in 1971? No!
On July 6, 1971, Sampson and co-inventor George Miley received a patent on a "gamma electric cell" that converted a gamma ray input into an electrical output (Among the first to do that was Bernhard Gross, US patent #3122640, 1964). What, you ask, does gamma radiation have to do with cellular communications technology? The answer: nothing. Some multiculturalist pseudo-historian must have seen the words "electric" and "cell" and thought "cell phone." The father of the cell phone is Martin Cooper who first demonstrated the technology in 1973.
Clock or Watch (First in America)
Benjamin Banneker built the first American timepiece in 1753? No! Abel Cottey, a Quaker clockmaker from Philadelphia, built a clock that is dated 1709 (source: Six Quaker Clockmakers, by Edward C. Chandlee; Philadelphia, The Historical Society of Pennsylvania, 1943). Banneker biographer Silvio Bedini further refutes the myth: Several watch and clockmakers were already established in the colony [Maryland] prior to the time that Banneker made the clock. In Annapolis alone there were at least four such craftsmen prior to 1750. Among these may be mentioned John Batterson, a watchmaker who moved to Annapolis in 1723; James Newberry, a watch and clockmaker who advertised in the Maryland Gazette on July 20, 1748; John Powell, a watch and clockmaker believed to have been indentured and to have been working in 1745; and Powell's master, William Roberts. Silvio Bedini, The Life of Benjamin Banneker (Baltimore: Maryland Historical Society, 1999)
George T. Sampson in 1892? No!
The "clothes-drier" described in Sampson's patent was actually a rack for holding clothes near a stove, and was intended as an "improvement" on similar contraptions: My invention relates to improvements in clothes-driers.... The object of my invention is to suspend clothing in close relation to a stove by means of frames so constructed that they can be readily placed in proper position and put aside when not required for use. US patent #476416, 1892 Nineteen years earlier, there were already over 300 US patents for such "clothes-driers" (Subject-Matter Index of Patents...1790 to 1873). A Frenchman named Pochon in 1799 built the first known tumble dryer - a crank-driven, rotating metal drum pierced with ventilation holes and held over heat. Electric tumble dryers appeared in the first half of the 20th century.
Lloyd P. Ray in 1897? No!
While the ultimate origin of the dustpan is lost in the mists (dusts?) of time, at least we know that US patent #20811 for "Dust-pan" was granted to T.E. McNeill in 1858. That was the first of about 164 US dustpan patents predating Lloyd Ray's. See the dustpan patent list.
Willie Johnson in 1884? No!
The hand-cranked egg beater with two intermeshed, counter-rotating whisks was invented by Turner Williams of Providence, Rhode Island in 1870 (US Patent #103811). It was an improvement on earlier rotary egg beaters that had only one whisk.
Did Granville Woods invent the electric trolley car, the overhead wire that powers it, or the "troller" wheel that makes contact with the trolley wire, in 1888? No! Dr. Werner von Siemens demonstrated his electric trolleybus, the Elektromote, near Berlin on April 29, 1882. The vehicle's two electric motors collected power through contact wheels rolling atop a pair of overhead wires. The earliest patentee of an electric trolley in the United States appears to be Eugene Cowles (#252193 in 1881), followed by Dr. Joseph R. Finney (#268476 in 1882) who operated an experimental trolley car near Pittsburgh, PA in the summer of 1882. In early 1885, John C. Henry established in Kansas City, MO, the first overhead-wire electric transit system to enter regular service in the United States. Belgian-born Charles van Depoele, who earned 240+ patents in electric railway technology and other fields, set up trolley lines in several North American cities by 1887. In February 1888, a trolley system designed by Frank Sprague began operating in Richmond, Virginia. Sprague's system became the lasting prototype for electric street railways in the US.
Alexander Miles in 1887? No! Was Miles the first to patent a self-closing shaft door? No!
Steam-powered hoisting devices were used in England by 1800. Elisha Graves Otis' 1853 "safety elevator" prevented the car from falling if the cable broke, and thus paved the way for the first commercial passenger elevator, installed in New York City's Haughwout Department Store in 1857. The first electric elevator appeared in Mannheim, Germany in 1880, built by the German firm of Siemens and Halske. A self-closing shaft door was invented by J.W. Meaker in 1874 ("Improvement in Self-closing Hatchways," US Patent No. 147,853). See Elevator Timeline
Was Philip Emeagwali responsible for the world's fastest computer or computation in 1989? Did he win the "Nobel Prize of computing"? Is he a "father of the Internet"? No! The fastest performance of a computer application in 1989 was 6 billion floating point operations per second (6 Gflops), achieved by a team from Mobil and Thinking Machines Corp. on a 64,000-processor "Connection Machine" invented by Danny Hillis. That was almost double the 3.1 Gflops of Emeagwali's computation. Computing's Nobel Prize equivalent is the Turing Award, which Emeagwali has never won. More...
Joseph Winters in 1878? No!
Winters' "fire escape" was a wagon-mounted ladder. The first such contraption patented in the US was the work of William P. Withey, 1840 (US patent #1599). The fire escape with a "lazy-tongs" type ladder, more similar to Winters' patent, was pioneered by Hüttman and Kornelio in 1849 (US patent #6155). One of the first fire escapes of any type was invented in 18th-century England: In 1784, Daniel Maseres, of England, invented a machine called a fire escape, which, being fastened to the window, would enable anyone to descend to the street without injury. Benjamin Butterworth, Growth of Industrial Art, 1888 By 1888 the US had granted 1,099 patents on fire escapes of "many forms, and of every possible material" (Butterworth).
Thomas J. Martin in 1872? No!
In 1813, British army captain George Manby created the first known portable fire extinguisher: a two-foot-tall copper cylinder that held 3 gallons of water and used compressed air as a propellant. One of the earliest extinguishers to use a chemical extinguishing agent, and not just water, was invented in 1849 by the Englishman William Henry Phillips, who patented his "fire annihilator" in England and the United States (US patent #7,269).
Food Additives, Meat Curing
Lloyd Hall "is responsible for the meat curing products, seasonings, emulsions, bakery products, antioxidants, protein hydrolysates, and many other products that keep our food fresh and flavorable"? No! Hall "revolutionized the meatpacking industry"? No! Hall introduced no major class of additive, certainly not meat curing salts (which are ancient), protein hydrolysates (popularized by Julius Maggi as flavor enhancers in 1886), emulsifiers and antioxidants (lecithin, for example, was used in both roles before Lloyd Hall had any patents in food processing). The so-called revolutionary meat curing product marketed by Hall's employer was invented primarily by Karl Max Seifert?; the number of Seifert's patent was printed right on the containers. Hall's main contribution to this product was to reduce its tendency to cake during storage. Details: Lloyd Hall myth.
W.B. Purvis in 1890? No!
The first reference to what seems to be a fountain pen appears in an Arabic text from 969 AD; details of the instrument are not known. A French "Bion" pen, dated 1702, represents the oldest fountain pen that still survives. Later models included John Scheffer's 1819 pen, possibly the first to be mass-produced; John Jacob Parker's "self-filling" pen of 1832; and the famous Lewis Waterman pen of 1884 (US Patents #293545, #307735). Early History of the Fountain Pen
Dr. George Grant in 1899? No!
A small rubber platform invented by Scotsmen William Bloxsom and Arthur Douglas was the world's first patented golf tee (British patent #12941 of 1889). The first known tee to penetrate the ground, rather than rest on the surface, was the peg-like "Perfectum" patented in 1892 by Percy Ellis of England. American dentist William Lowell introduced the most common form of tee used today, the simple wooden peg with a flared top. Details...
Lyda Newman in 1898? No!
An early US patent for a recognizably modern hairbrush went to Hugh Rock in 1854 (US Design Patent no. D645), though surely there were hairbrushes long before there was a US Patent Office. The claim that Lyda Newman's brush was the first with "synthetic bristles" is false: her patent mentions nothing about synthetic bristles and is concerned only with a new way of making the handle detachable from the head. Besides, a hairbrush that included "elastic wire teeth" in combination with natural bristles had already been patented by Samuel Firey in 1870 (US, #106680). Nylon bristles weren't possible until the invention of nylon in 1935.
Frederick Mosby? No
The original patent for the tungsten halogen lamp (US #2,883,571; April 21, 1959) is recorded to Elmer G. Fridrich and Emmett H. Wiley of General Electric. The two had built a working prototype as early as 1953. Fred Mosby was part of the GE team charged with developing the prototype lamp into a marketable product, but was not responsible for the original halogen lamp or the concept behind it.
William Purvis in 1883? No!
The earliest known postal handstamp was brought into use by Henry Bishop, Postmaster General of Great Britain, in the year 1661. The stamp imprinted the mail with a bisected circle containing the month and the date. See "Bishop marks"
Alice Parker in 1919? No!
In the hypocaust heating systems built by the ancient Romans, hot air from a furnace circulated under the floor and up through channels inside the walls, thereby distributing heat evenly around the building. One of the most famous heating systems in recent centuries was the iron furnace stove known as the "Franklin stove," named after its purported originator Benjamin Franklin around 1745 AD. The US had issued over 4000 patents for heating stoves and furnaces by 1888 (Benjamin Butterworth, Growth of Industrial Art, 1888).
Oscar E. Brown in 1892? No!
Some sources on the web, if not ignorant enough to say Brown invented the first horseshoe ever, will at least try to credit him for the first double or compound horseshoe made of two layers: one permanently secured to the hoof, and one auxiliary layer that can be removed and replaced when it wears out. However, in the US there were already 39 earlier patents for horseshoes using that same concept. The first of these was issued to J.B. Kendall of Boston in 1861, patent #33709.
Augustus Jackson in 1832? No!
Flavored ices resembling sherbet were known in China in ancient times. In Europe, sherbet-like concoctions evolved into ice cream by the 16th century, and around 1670 or so, the Café Procope in Paris offered creamy frozen dairy desserts to the public. The first written record of ice cream in the New World comes from a letter dated 1700, attesting that Maryland Governor William Bladen served the treat to his guests. In 1777, the New York Gazette advertised the sale of ice cream by confectioner Philip Lenzi. History of Ice Cream
Sarah Boone in 1892? No!
Of the several hundred US patents on ironing boards granted prior to Sarah Boone's, the first three went to William Vandenburg in 1858 (patents #19390, #19883, #20231). The first American female patentee of an ironing board is probably Sarah Mort of Dayton, Ohio, who received patent #57170 in 1866. In 1869, Henry Soggs of Columbus, Pennsylvania earned US patent #90966 for an ironing board resembling the modern type, with folding legs, adjustable height, and a cover. Another nice example of a modern-looking board was designed by J.H. Mallory in 1871, patent #120296. Details...
Laser Cataract Surgery
Patricia Bath "transformed eye surgery" by inventing the first laser device to treat cataracts in 1986? No! Use of lasers to treat cataracts in the eye began to develop in the mid 1970s. M.M. Krasnov of Russia reported the first such procedure in 1975. One of the earliest US patents for laser cataract removal (#3,982,541) was issued to Francis L'Esperance in 1976. In later years, a number of experimenters worked independently on laser devices for removing cataracts, including Daniel Eichenbaum, whose work became the basis of the Paradigm PhotonT device; and Jack Dodick, whose Dodick Laser PhotoLysis System eventually became the first laser unit to win FDA approval for cataract removal in the United States. Still, the majority of cataract surgeries continue to be performed using ultrasound devices, not lasers. Details...
John Burr in 1899? No!
English engineer Edwin Budding invented the first reel-type lawn mower (with blades arranged in a cylindrical pattern) and had it patented in England in 1830. In 1868 the United States issued patent #73807 to Amariah M. Hills of Connecticut, who went on to establish the Archimedean Lawn Mower Co. in 1871. By 1888, the US Patent Office had granted 138 patents for lawn mowers (Butterworth, Growth of Industrial Art). Doubtlessly there were even more by the time Burr got his patent in 1899. Some website authors want Burr to have invented the first "rotary blade" mower, with a centrally mounted spinning blade. But his patent #624749 shows yet another twist on the old reel mower, differing in only a few details with Budding's original.
J. H. Smith in 1897? Elijah McCoy? No!
The first US patent with the title "lawn sprinkler" was issued to J. Lessler of Buffalo, New York in 1871 (#121949). Early examples of water-propelled, rotating lawn sprinklers were patented by J. Oswald in 1890 (#425340) and J. S. Woolsey in 1891 (#457099) among a gazillion others. Smith's patent shows just another rotating sprinkler, and McCoy's 1899 patent was for a turtle-shaped sprinkler.
Mailbox (letter drop box)
P. Downing invented the street letter drop box in 1891? No! George Becket invented the private mailbox in 1892? No! The US Postal Service says that "Street boxes for mail collection began to appear in large [US] cities by 1858." They appeared in Europe even earlier, according to historian Laurin Zilliacus: Mail boxes as we understand them first appeared on the streets of Belgian towns in 1848. In Paris they came two years later, while the English received their 'pillar boxes' in 1855. Laurin Zilliacus, Mail for the World, p. 178 (New York, J. Day Co., 1953) >From the same book (p.178), "Private mail boxes were invented in the United States in about 1860." Eventually, letter drop boxes came equipped with inner lids to prevent miscreants from rummaging through the mail pile. The first of many US patents for such a purpose was granted in 1860 to John North of Middletown, Connecticut (US Pat. #27466).
Thomas W. Stewart in 1893? No!
Mops go back a long, long way before 1893. Just how long, is hard to determine. Restricting our view to the modern era, we find that the United States issued its first mop patent (#241) in 1837 to Jacob Howe, called "Construction of Mop-Heads and the Mode of Securing them upon Handles." One of the first patented mops with a built-in wringer was the one H. & J. Morton invented in 1859 (US #24049). The mop specified in Stewart's patent #499402 has a lever-operated clamp for "holding the mop rags"; the lever is not a wringing mechanism as erroneously reported on certain websites. Other inventors had already patented mops with lever-operated clamps, one of the first being Greenleaf Stackpole in 1869 (US Pat. #89803).
Paper Punch (hand-held)
Charles Brooks in 1893? No!
Was it the first with a hinged receptacle to catch the clippings? No! The first numbered US patent for a hand-held hole punch was #636, issued to Solyman Merrick in 1838. Robert James Kellett earned the first two US patents for a chad-catching hole punch, in 1867 (patent #65090) and 1868 (#79232).
John Lee Love in 1897? No!
Bernard Lassimone of Limoges, France invented one of the earliest sharpeners, receiving French patent number 2444 in 1828. An apparent ancestor of the 20th-century hand-cranked sharpener was patented by G. F. Ballou in 1896 (US #556709) and marketed by the A.B. Dick Company as the "Planetary Pencil Pointer." As the user held the pencil stationary and turned the crank, twin milling cutters revolved around the tip of the pencil and shaved it into a point. Love's patent #594114 shows a variation on a different kind of sharpener, in which one would crank the pencil itself around in a stirring motion. An earlier device of a similar type was devised in 1888 by G.H. Courson (patent #388533), and sold under the name "President Pencil Sharpener." Here are several other examples of 19th century sharpeners: Early Mechanical Pencil Sharpeners Mechanical Pencil Sharpener Gallery ~ 1884-1899
Permanent Wave Machine (for perming hair)
Marjorie Joyner in 1928? No!
That would be German hairdresser Karl Ludwig Nessler (aka Charles Nestlé) no later than 1906. Postmarking and Canceling Machine William Barry in 1897? No!
Try Pearson Hill of England, in 1857. Hill's machine marked the postage stamp with vertical lines and postmark date. By 1892, US post offices were using several brands of machines, including one that could cancel, postmark, count and stack more than 20,000 pieces of mail per hour (Marshall Cushing, Story of Our Post Office, Boston: A. M. Thayer & co., 1892, pp.189-191).
W.A. Lavalette invented "the advanced printing press" in 1878? No! Movable-type printing first appeared in East Asia. In Europe, around 1455, Johann Gutenberg adapted the screw press used in other trades such as winemaking and combined it with type-metal alloy characters and oil-based printing ink. Major advances after Gutenberg include the cylinder printing press (c. 1811) by Frederick Koenig and Andreas Bauer, the rotary press (1846) by Richard M. Hoe, and the web press (1865) by William Bullock. Major advances do not include Lavalette's patent, which was only one of 3,268 printing patents granted in the US by the year 1888 (Butterworth, Growth of Industrial Art). Improvements After Gutenberg
Propeller for Ship
George Tolivar or Benjamin Montgomery? No! John Stevens constructed a boat with twin steam-powered propellers in 1804 in the first known application of a screw propeller for marine propulsion. Other important pioneers in the early 1800s included Sir Francis Pettit Smith of England, and Swedish-born ship designer John Ericsson (US patent #588) who later designed the USS Monitor.
Thomas Elkins in 1879? John Stanard in 1891? No! Oliver Evans proposed a mechanical refrigerator based on a vapor-compression cycle in 1805 and Jacob Perkins had a working machine built in 1834. Dr. John Gorrie created an air-cycle refrigeration system in about 1844, which he installed in a Florida hospital. In the 1850s Alexander Twining in the USA and James Harrison in Australia used mechanical refrigeration to produce ice on a commercial scale. Around the same time, the Carré brothers of France led the development of absorption refrigeration systems. A more detailed timeline Stanard's patent describes not a refrigeration machine, but an old-fashioned icebox - an insulated cabinet into which ice is placed to cool the interior. As such, it was a "refrigerator" only in the old sense of the term, which included non-mechanical coolers. Elkins created a similarly low-tech cooler, acknowledging in his patent #221222 that "I am aware that chilling substances inclosed within a porous box or jar by wetting its outer surface is an old and well-known process."
Andrew Beard in 1892? No!
The Subject Matter Index of Patents Issued from the United States Patent Office from 1790 to 1873 Inclusive lists 394 "Rotary Engine" patents from 1810-1873. The Wankel engine, a rotary combustion engine with a four-stroke cycle, dates from 1954. History of the Rotary Engine from 1588 Onward
Screw Socket for Light Bulb
Lewis Latimer? No!
The earliest evidence for a light bulb screw base design is a drawing in a Thomas Edison notebook dated Sept. 11, 1880. It is not the work of Latimer, though: Edison's long-time associates, Edward H. Johnson and John Ott, were principally responsible for designing fixtures in the fall of 1880. Their work resulted in the screw socket and base very much like those widely used today. R. Friedel and P. Israel, Edison's Electric Light: Biography of an Invention, (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press, 1986). The 1880 sketch of the screw socket is reproduced in the book cited above.
Onesimus the slave in 1721? No!
Onesimus knew of variolation, an early inoculation technique practiced in several areas of the world before the discovery of vaccination. English physician Edward Jenner developed the smallpox vaccine in 1796 after finding that the relatively innocuous cowpox virus built immunity against the deadly smallpox. This discovery led to the eventual eradication of endemic smallpox throughout the world. Vaccination differs from the primitive inoculation method known as variolation, which involved the deliberate planting of live smallpox into a healthy person in hopes of inducing a mild form of the disease that would provide immunity from further infection. Variolation not only was risky to the patient but, more importantly, failed to prevent smallpox from spreading. Known in Asia by 1000 AD, the practice reached the West via more than one channel.
Smokestack for Locomotives
L. Bell in 1871? No!
Even the first steam locomotives, such as the one built by Richard Trevithick in 1804, were equipped with smokestacks. Later smokestacks featured wire netting to prevent hazardous sparks from escaping. Page 115 of John H. White Jr.'s American Locomotives: An Engineering History, 1830-1880 (1997 edition) displays a composite picture showing 57 different types of spark-arresting smokestacks devised before 1860.
Steam Boiler Furnace
Granville Woods in 1884? No!
The steam engine boiler is of course as old as the steam engine itself. The Subject Matter Index of Patents Issued from the United States Patent Office from 1790 to 1873 Inclusive lists several hundred variations and improvements to the steam boiler, including the revolutionary water-tube boiler patented in 1867 by American inventors George Herman Babcock and Stephen Wilcox.
Charles Brooks in 1896? No!
Brooks' patent was for a modified version of a common type of street sweeper cart that had long been known, with a rotary brush that swept refuse onto an elevator belt and into a trash bin. In the United States, street sweepers started being patented in the 1840s, and by 1900 the Patent Office had issued about 300 patents for such machines. Details...
Supercharger for Automobiles
Joseph Gammel/Gamell in 1976? No!
In 1885, Gottlieb Daimler received a German patent for supercharging an internal combustion engine. Louis Renault patented a centrifugal supercharger in France in 1902. An early supercharged racecar was built by Lee Chadwick of Pottstown, Pennsylvania in 1908 and reportedly reached a speed of 100 miles per hour. History of Supercharging
T. Elkins in 1897? No!
The Minoans of Crete are said to have invented a flush toilet thousands of years ago; however, there is probably no direct ancestral relationship between it and the modern one that evolved primarily in England starting in the late 16th century, when Sir John Harrington devised a flushing device for his godmother Queen Elizabeth. In 1775 Alexander Cummings patented a toilet in which some water remained after each flush, thereby suppressing odors from below. The "water closet" continued to evolve, and in 1885, Thomas Twyford provided us with a single-piece ceramic toilet similar to the one we know today. Who Invented the Toilet?
Toilet for Railroad Cars
Lewis Latimer in 1874? No! William E. Marsh Jr. of New Jersey took out US patent #95597 for "Improvement in Water-closets for Railroad Cars" five years prior to Latimer's 1874 patent with the same title. Marsh's patent specification suggests that railroad-car water closets, i.e., toilets, were already in use: In the closets or privies of railroad cars, the cold and wind, especially while the train is in motion, are very disagreeable... My invention is to remove these objectionable features.... W. Marsh, US patent #95597, 1869
M.A. Cherry in 1886? No!
In Germany in the year 1680 or thereabouts, paraplegic watchmaker Stephan Farffler built his own tricycle at 22 years of age. He designed it to be pedaled with the hands, for obvious reasons. History of the tricycle
Richard Spikes in 1913? No! Did the 1913 Pierce Arrow feature Spikes' turn signals? No! Electric turn signal lights were devised as early as 1907 (U.S. Patent 912,831), but were not widely offered by major automobile manufacturers until the late 1930s, when GM developed its own version and made it standard on Buicks. The Pierce Arrow Museum in Buffalo, NY denies that directional signals were offered on 1913 Pierce Arrows.
L.S. Burridge & N.R. Marshman in 1885? No!
Henry Mill, an English engineer, was the first person to patent the basic idea of the typewriter in 1714. The first working typewriter known to have actually been built was the work of Pellegrino Turri of Italy in 1808. Americans C. L. Sholes and C. Glidden patented the familiar QWERTY keyboard in 1868 and brought it to market in 1873. In 1878 change-case keys were added that enabled the typing of both capital and small letters. Typewriter History"
"Topaz" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message news:email@example.com... > On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:22:39 -0500, "Freedom Man" > <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > >>Very INFERIOR schools! > > So you say. Of course you get ideas like that from the Jewish > controlled media. > > >>That is opinion, not proof. > >>There is no nation exclusively for any other "racial" category of people, >>so >>why one for Whites only? >>This would not reflect well on the mindset of we Whites. > > No one is shocked if the vast majority of people in China are Chinese. > That goes for every other race except Whites. Only the White race is > slated for destruction according to the Jews plan.
Chinese live in China; Americans live in America. Some Chinese are not of "Yellow" ancestry, but are Chinese nevertheless. Likewise some Americans -
>>But your rhetoric and support for Nazism promotes it. > > > By Shaun Walker. > > The point is that all we actually seek is White > self-determination in our own territory, like every other race. > How much more reasonable can that be? > No one questions the self-determination Indians have on their > reservations.
The shameful treatment of the Native Americans does not reflect well on the morality of the White race. I cannot believe this would not have occured under "National Socialism" to an even worse degree.
> No one questions the right to self-determination for the Eskimos > (Inuit) in the far North of Canada. Hell no. The Canadian > government has even passed laws to grant the Eskimos control over > a vast expanse of territory which the non-Whites claimed. > This model exists throughout the world: everywhere you go, you > will find assorted non-White races and groups all successfully > claiming their right to self determination, all with the support > of the liberals and even other non-Whites.
National Socialists (Nazis) are "liberal?"
> The Palestinians are a case in point. Most politically-prominent > Negroes in America support the Palestinians having a separate > state, and object to the Palestinians being ruled by the Zionist > Jewish state. And rightly so. In this demand, they are joined by > the White extreme left-wing of the political spectrum.
Far from just the "extreme left wing."
> Yet, you will not find one of these White extremist left-wingers > supporting the concept of a territory for White people in which > they can have self-determination. Liberal hypocrisy is as > boundless as time.
You are confusing religious and political difference with genetic (racial) differences.
> If we, or anyone else who supports White self-determination, > raises the issue of White separatism with any of these non-White > groups, or the left-wingers of any race, we are dismissed as > "White supremacists" or "haters" or what-ever word they like to > use at that moment in time. > But honestly, we don't care much about what they call us. We know > what we need, and we work day and night to achieve it. Why should > we be ashamed of being White? On the contrary, we are proud of > our race, the race that has produced every single great > scientific innovation on the planet. Our race has produced all > the greatest works of art, and it is our aesthetic norms that > dominate the entire world...
Not "all," by a long shot! We should not be ashamed of having white skin, but should be ashamed of some of the deeds of our "race," such as the near genocide of the Native Americans.
> White nationalists who look at this > fact closely, can quickly become discouraged and come to the > conclusion that White separatist activity is pointless. But they > are forgetting an important message given to us by our founder, > Dr. William Pierce.
"Separatist" activity is divisive and inevitable leads to conflict and warfare.
> He told us, in no uncertain terms, that when we work for our new > society, we should not be discouraged by what we see around us. > We work, Dr. Pierce said, not for what it is now - otherwise we > would be conservatives - but rather we work for what can be. > Dr. Pierce used the analogy of a garden, overrun with weeds. A > gardener, who sees only weeds, might give up without even trying. > A visionary, who sees the blades of grass and roses lying half > submerged in the weeds, and who conceptualizes a grand garden, > free of weeds and sprouting new life, the re-growth of Nature's > glory, is the true carrier of our racial renewal and the rebirth > of our Aryan Folk. > No, we are not conservatives who seek to preserve the existing > order. To hell with the existing order - it is corrupt, decadent, > and must fall. We don't want to preserve the obviously failed, > existing social construct; we wish to see a new society, in which > merit and merit alone determines political leadership, not with > how the current establishment promotes the best liars to the top. > We do not seek to maintain the existing raceless order, or to go > back to the days of segregation. We know and understand fully > that segregation, as well-intentioned as it might have been, was > a recipe for disaster. > We don't seek to rule over anybody but ourselves, and we need > racial separation in our own areas, and not segregation within a > joint area. That is the only solution. > No sir, conservatives we are not. We are revolutionaries in the > true sense of the word: we seek to remodel the world in a new > image, to cast down the lies and racial treason of the old order, > and to return to the eternal laws of race as our guiding light. > Only with the full understanding of race, acceptance of racial > differences and geographic separation, can we avoid racial > conflict. > Yes, you heard me correctly: we seek a world without racial > conflict, where each race is free to achieve whatever it may, > within its own space, without interference from outside. > This goal is really this ironic, to the extreme that the solution > to the racial problem which we seek, is in fact the only manner > in which the racial harmony which the liberals so desperately > desire, can be achieved. > We know and understand this eternal truth. Birds of a feather > flock together, as should you and I. > We have our goal clearly laid out in front of us. We are resolute > in our intention to see the flowering garden of our glorious race > instead of the Jew-ridden, race-mixed weed patch, and we work > unceasingly for our goal.
>>Hitler was a vicious autocrat; a fascist. I oppose that form of >>governance, >>as freedom is precious to me. > > The Jews control your media.
Even if so, this does not respond to my statement immediately above, but is a deliberate distraction from it.
> ADOLF HITLER > SCHWERIN, GUSTLOFF'S FUNERAL > SPEECH OF FEBRUARY 12, 1936 > > . . . BEHIND every murder stood the same power which is responsible > for this murder; behind these harmless insignificant fellow-countrymen > who were instigated and incited to crime stands the hate-filled power > of our Jewish foe, a foe to whom we had done no harm, but who none the > less sought to subjugate our German people and make of it its slave - > the foe who is responsible for all the misfortune that fell upon us in > 1918, for all the misfortune which plagued Germany in the years that > followed. Those members of the Party and honorable comrades of ours > all fell, and the same fate was planned for others: many hundreds > survived as cripples or severely wounded, blinded or lamed; more than > 40,000 others were injured. And among them were so many loyal folk > whom we all knew and who were near and dear to us, of whom we were > sure that they could never do any harm to anyone, that they had never > done any harm to anyone, whose only crime was that they devoted > themselves to the cause of Germany. > > In the ranks of those whose lives were thus sacrificed there stood > also Horst Wessel, the singer who gave to the Movement its song, never > dreaming that he would join those spirits who march and have marched > with us. > > And now on foreign soil National Socialism has gained its first > conscious martyr - a man who did nothing save to enter the lists for > Germany which is not only his sacred right but his duty in this world: > a man who did nothing save remember his homeland and pledge himself to > her in loyalty. He, too, was murdered, just like so many others. Even > at the time when on January 30 three years ago we had come into power, > precisely the same things happened in Germany, at Frankfort on the > Oder, at K\ufffdpenick, and again at Brunswick. The procedure was always > the same: a few men come and call someone out of his house and then > stab or shoot him down. > > That is no chance: it is the same guiding hand which organized these > crimes and purposes to do so again. Now for the first time one who is > responsible for these acts has appeared in his own person. For the > first time he employs no harmless German fellow-countryman. It is a > title to fame for Switzerland, as it is for our own Germans in > Switzerland, that no one let himself be hired to do this deed so that > for the first time the spiritual begetter of the act must himself > perform the act. So our comrade has fallen a victim to that power > which wages a fanatical warfare not only against our German people but > against every free, autonomous, and independent people. We understand > the challenge to battle and we take up the gage! My dear comrade! You > have not fallen in vain!
Nice propaganda to justify ongoing conflict, but it does NOT answer to the statement that Hitler was a vicious autocrat; a fascist. As I said, I oppose that form of governance, as freedom is precious to me.
>>You of course omit any reference to the achievements of non-whites, >>including their contributions to those you listed above.
< snip >
We have no way of being certain of the origin of many discoveries and inventions that now benefit us. But they do in general benefit ALL of us, and I believe that all subgroups/races within the human race as a whole contributed to some degree. We should be moving forward in unity, not at each others' throats over superficial genetic differences.
2013-01-02 17:15:09 EST
On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 22:11:33 -0500, "Freedom Man" <email@example.com> wrote:
>Chinese live in China; Americans live in America. >Some Chinese are not of "Yellow" ancestry, but are Chinese nevertheless. >Likewise some Americans -
National Soclialism does not buy that. If they don't have "Yellow" ancestry they are not Chinese.
>The shameful treatment of the Native Americans does not reflect well on the >morality of the White race. >I cannot believe this would not have occured under "National Socialism" to >an even worse degree.
By David Duke Go back far enough my friend. Do you really believe that historical Asian and Amerindian tribal and ethnic groups didn't destroy other peoples and even different Indian ethnic or tribal groups? I have a PhD in history and have read extensively on the Indian tribal histories in the Americas. For instance, every American historian is aware that Indian tribes fought each other with merciless cruelty without European interference. The Hurons for instance were almost totally exterminated by the Iroquois, a closely related tribe. The Comanche, supreme warriors, terrorized all their neighboring tribes and had a fierce reputation among Indians for slowly torturing prisoners of war to death. The Aztecs, who were far more technologically capable than the other Indian tribal groups around them, as were the Incas in Peru, were as imperialist in their world as Europeans were in theirs. Perhaps your heritage is Arab. You must be aware that Arab slave traders depopulated whole regions of Black Africa. Would you use this fact of history to justify the oppression of the Palestinians? Maybe you are Indian or Pakistani or Malaysian or Persian. No matter what your heritage is. Maybe you are of African descent, perhaps a Hutu or Tutsi or Zulu. Look at the record of slavery, conquest, tribalism, even genocide with open eyes, the same eyes with which you try to condemn all Europeans! Don't you realize there is hardly any populated part of India, or Africa or South America, Asia or Europe, where historically, even through prehistory, that one group didn't go into another area and take control through the conquest of war and differential birthrates, and frankly yes, even genocide. My friend, cannot you see honestly that all human tribes, ethnic groups, and races have dirty hands. If European people have historically done evil things so that today they deserve annihilation, then you should go ahead and say that all humanity deserves it, including your own people. And the fact that almost every human race or tribe has done this kind of thing in the past, does not make those things right or moral in today's world. Hopefully, we have developed a new morality of the relations of one people with another. Almost every atrocity, human rights violation and bloody war is based on real or perceived past wrongs of other peoples and nations. And now apparently you want to continue that horrific vicious cycle, by telling me that because of past wrongs real or perceived that Europeans of whatever nationality have no right to be concerned about preserving their heritage, their freedom and their human rights. There is no inherent evil in the European people. You have been programmed by the Zio extremists to hate their historic enemy, to hate their enemy so they could use their divide and conquer strategy. They work overtime with their control of Hollywood and academia to demonize European Americans so as to deflect you from the real controllers of America and the Western World. If European Americans really controlled the media would they promote the countless films that constantly evoke emotional feelings of hate and disgust toward themselves? Would they promote immigration intended to make them a tiny minority in the government and culture that they themselves built? European people historically have had times of imperialism and expansionism as have all peoples. But we, and hopefully all enlightened people have learned a new morality, and become dedicated to the idea that oppression against other peoples should not continue. Europeans engaged in slavery, as did all other peoples on Earth, but every European nation on Earth ended slavery on its own. And then, Europeans have worked hard around the world to save the lives and freedom of slaves. A good example is Britain that not only ended the slave trade of its sovereigns but used the British navy to free slaves wherever it found such trafficking on Earth and on the high seas. Remember too that percentage wise, a tiny percent of Europeans owned slaves. Even in the Southern part of the United States in the Antebellum South it was less than 5 percent. In Canada, slavery of other races was almost nonexistent, the same is true in the heart of Europe. Did the Arabic people not engage in slavery, or the Asian peoples, the African peoples, the Indian peoples? If you think otherwise, then you are extremely naive and biased. The most horrible aspects of slavery were found in the inhuman aspects of the slave trade. Watch my video and read my books and you will learn about the tiny minority of the world's population who were the world's champions of slavery. But, has the media given you images of the Jewish slave trader? No, they have given you countless images of the Christian slaver and slave trader such as the latest movie Django by the Weinstein Bros. Studio. They have instilled in you an obvious emotional hatred about Christian Europeans, but only the kindest representations of the real tribal masters of the slave tribe. Could that be because it is the same hyper-racist tribe that controls the media? If you want to hate European people, deny their human rights and wish for their destruction, then you support the same kinds of crimes for which you condemn them. Funny, this European whom you seem to despise, doesn't want to destroy you or your pepole, while you wish harm upon him and his people. Who is it that needs a lesson in hypocrisy? Another fact you might have overlooked in regard to the Indian question is that modern anthropology has extensive forensic, physical and DNA evidence that actually Europeans settled in America thousands of years before the East Asian "Indians" came. I have read extensively in the latest historical and anthropological currents in academia, and I realize that it is likely that you know little about these discoveries and scientific research. The Zio media has no interest in publicizing into the common consciousness the latest historic, archeological and genetic evidence of the presence of European settlers in North America long before the presence of East Asian "Indian" migrations. Certainly the theory is controversial in academia, and the Zio-dominated anthropology since the time of Boas has a vested interest in denying any evidence that celebrates the heritage of any people other than their own fellow tribalists. But the evidence cannot be summarily dismissed, and many prestigious anthropologists accept the hypothesis. Among them is Dennis J. Stanford, an archaeologist and Director of the Paleoindian/Paleoecology Program at the National Museum of Natural History at the Smithsonian Institution. Another respected academic is Prof. Bruce Bradley of Exeter university in Britain, who has offered copious evidence of European presence in North America. Other scientists have studied Indian tribes deep within the North American continent and they found distinctly European genes, and by scientific genetic dating methods, found the presence of European genes in Amerindian people that dated earlier than Columbus or any Norse incursions. If this ultimately becomes scientifically proven, it would show that these ancient Europeans were basically wiped out by the Asian migrations, leaving only traces of European genes in some of the current "native" populations. The difference is that the Asian invaders didn't create any reservations, no vast tracts of land for the people whom they conquered and decimated, the Indian/Asian invaders simply exterminated and subsumed them all. This fact of the probable genocide against Europeans in the Americas, or the horrific invasions into Europe and Western Asia by Mongol Asians, does not make me hate them or want to suppress them or harm them in any way! Arab and Muslim states invaded and ruled over European lands, but I am not so blind as to not recognize the harsh realities of the Crusades or European colonialism. In fact, I personally have much respect, even honor for the Indian peoples of America. I love how they lived in harmony and respect for Nature. And they had every right to courageously defend themselves from the invaders hundreds of years ago, just as Europeans had and have those same rights to defend their homelands. Whether or not you believe this is not really important though. In fact it is ultimately immaterial to the discussion of human rights. For even if you don't accept this historical concept, it doesn't change the fact that the ancestors of every people on earth have committed what by today's standards are called human rights violations. Even the East Asian people who migrated into the Americas, themselves undoubtedly have histories of tribal human aggression against other ethnic expression of mankind stretching back into Asia in the remote mists of time. The point is that using collective crimes of any people in the remote past to justify harming present populations is itself immoral. For, as I have said, past wrongs, or perceived past wrongs of enemies, have always been the justification used to commit horrific human rights crimes. You might be so attached to your hatred of Europeans which has been instilled in you by the Zio media, that you can't look at the evidence objectively. Fueled in great part by the media, anti-European hate is now practically a religion. It is similar to the Zio media induced lie that Big Oil controls American politics when not one of the 40 largest political donors to Obama and Romney were from oil companies. Or the Zio myth that the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars were for oil, when not one more drop of oil was gained from those wars, but the wars cost trillions of dollars from the American people. The war was not for oil. It was for Israel and Jewish supremacism. Or the Zio media inculcated perception that organized crime is overwhelmingly an Italian thing when the fact is that even in the 2oth century organized crime has been far more of a "Jewish thing" than an "Italian institution." You may have unknowingly developed a visceral hatred of Europeans because of the portrayal of the African Slave trade to the Americas. But Jewish Supremacist Steven Spielberg's Amistad effectively covered up the Jewish domination of this abominable enterprise. Watch my documentary The Shocking Jewish Role in Slavery. The Zio media doesn't make you conscious about any of this. The Weinstein Bros and ZioWood do not want you to be aware of the prominent Jewish role in the slave trade, because they want you to hate European folks rather than oppose the people who truly exploit and rule over you today in the Zio Matrix of Media, politics and finance! And, of course, they want European Americans to hate themselves so they will not defend themselves from the real tribal supremacists who have conquered them. You need to ask yourself about the mindset in which you now seem to endorse harm and genocide upon people of European descent. That's the difference between you and me. I wish no harm against any other people on this Earth, and I believe that genocide is the ultimate evil, no matter who it's victims are. You sir, may be the hypocrite, but I know you don't realize it. You are not intending to be hypocritical, you have been programmed this way by the Zio media. You have been conditioned by the ultimate supremacists on earth, the Jewish Supremacists, to hate the European people, as many of my own people have been conditioned to hate themselves. It is the same force that really runs America and the "American" media. And they have a stake in you hating European Americans. It is so they can rule over America and Europe, and ultimately seek their rule every other race and nation through their control of the Western nations. The truth is that the dispossession of European Americans is actually the ultimate source of the horrific policies of the Zio Globalists who harm not just the Palestinians, but the entire world. They want to make African Americans hate European Americans rather than understand the harm done to them by the Zio supremacists who run the media that destroys their families, promotes drug and alcohol abuse and addiction, sexual degeneracies, violence, and other destruction of the African American community. They want to make my own people hate themselves so these ultimate supremacists and haters can rule over us. I wish the best for you. I will repeat this until I am blue in the face, until I lose this aging voice: I believe that every people has the right to be free and independent, to preserve and celebrate and enhance their own values, culture and unique expressions of humanity. I am the opposite of what is defined as a "racist." That is because I not only oppose with all my heart and soul the oppression of any race or any people, I believe that every unique expression of humanity has the right to be free and should be preserved, even enhanced in its unique expressions of culture and art and philosophy. I believe no people has the right to enslave or exploit or harm any other people. I believe in human rights for all people, and by that I mean every people on earth, including the European people. I believe that there is never, ever an excuse to deny people their basic human rights. Nothing ever justifies harming the innocent. I believe that different peoples can and should be able to work out their disagreements without war and hate and harm. But I also know that we are ruled by a tiny tribal extremist minority that maintains their power and control over us by a divide and conquer strategy. Even those misguided miscreants should be treated with human rights in mind. But those who commit crimes should answer for them within the bounds of law and justice. I also believe that they must be deposed from their malevolent influence over us and over the Earth. They must be dethroned from their power over the media, International Finance and Politics. I hope I have afforded you another perspective on a very emotional issue for so many people. Please Wake up! All peoples have the right to human rights, even those you might despise! Best Wishes to You, Dr. David Duke
>National Socialists (Nazis) are "liberal?"
They were, are, against Capitalism. One of the posters the National Socialists put on walls said that "right" and "left" were outdated terms.
> >> The Palestinians are a case in point. Most politically-prominent >> Negroes in America support the Palestinians having a separate >> state, and object to the Palestinians being ruled by the Zionist >> Jewish state. And rightly so. In this demand, they are joined by >> the White extreme left-wing of the political spectrum. > >Far from just the "extreme left wing."
> >> Yet, you will not find one of these White extremist left-wingers >> supporting the concept of a territory for White people in which >> they can have self-determination. Liberal hypocrisy is as >> boundless as time. > >You are confusing religious and political difference with genetic (racial) >differences.
Nations should be based on race. Liberals have no problem with any other race, except for Whites.
> >Not "all," by a long shot! >We should not be ashamed of having white skin, but should be ashamed of some >of the deeds of our "race," such as the near genocide of the Native >Americans.
See Duke quote above.
>"Separatist" activity is divisive and inevitable leads to conflict and >warfare.
Only from those who don't want us to have a White nation.
>>>Hitler was a vicious autocrat; a fascist. I oppose that form of >>>governance, >>>as freedom is precious to me. >> >> The Jews control your media. > >Even if so, this does not respond to my statement immediately above, but is >a deliberate distraction from it.
Here is a quote from Mein Kampf:
"The fight which Fascist Italy waged against Jewry's three principal weapons, the profound reasons for which may not have been consciously understood (though I do not believe this myself) furnishes the best proof that the poison fangs of that Power which transcends all State boundaries are being drawn, even though in an indirect way. The prohibition of Freemasonry and secret societies, the suppression of the supranational Press and the definite abolition of Marxism, together with the steadily increasing consolidation of the Fascist concept of the State--all this will enable the Italian Government, in the course of some years, to advance more and more the interests of the Italian people without paying any attention to the hissing of the Jewish world-hydra. "The English situation is not so favorable. In that country which has 'the freest democracy' the Jew dictates his will, almost unrestrained but indirectly, through his influence on public opinion."
>Nice propaganda to justify ongoing conflict, but it does NOT answer to the >statement that Hitler was a vicious autocrat; a fascist. >As I said, I oppose that form of governance, as freedom is precious to me.
Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
"Human progress and human cultures are not founded by the multitude. They are exclusively the work of personal genius and personal efficiency."
"Does anybody honestly believe that human progress originates in the composite brain of the majority and not in the brain of the individual personality?"
"The devastating influence of the parliamentary institution might not easily be recognized by those who read the Jewish Press, unless the reader has learned how to think independently and examine the facts for himself. This institution is primarily responsible for the crowded inrush of mediocre people into the field of politics. Confronted with such a phenomenon, a man who is endowed with real qualities of leadership will be tempted to refrain from taking part in political life; because under these circumstances the situation does not call for a man who has a capacity for constructive statesmanship but rather for a man who is capable of bargaining for the favour of the majority. Thus the situation will appeal to small minds and will attract them accordingly."
"One truth which must always be borne in mind is that the majority can never replace the man. The majority represents not only ignorance but also cowardice. And just as a hundred blockheads do not equal one man of wisdom, so a hundred poltroons are incapable of any political line of action that requires moral strength and fortitude."
"It is not the aim of our modern democratic parliamentary system to bring together an assembly of intelligent and well-informed deputies. Not at all. The aim rather is to bring together a group of nonentities who are dependant on others for their views and who can be all the more easily led, the narrower the mental outlook of each individual is. That is the only way in which a party policy, according the the evil meaning it has to-day, can be put into effect. And by this method alone is it possible for the wirepuller, who exercises the real control, to remain in the dark, so that personally he can never be brought to account for his actions."
"Such people would raise an outcry, if, for instance, anyone should attempt to set up a dictatorship, even though the man responsible for it were Frederick the Great and even though the politicians for the time being, who constituted the parlimentary majority, were small and incompetent men or maybe even on a lower grade of inferiority; because to such sticklers for abstract principles the law of democracy is more sacred than the welfare of the nation."
"the best form of government is that which makes it quite natural for the best brains to reach a position of dominant importance and influence in the community."
>We have no way of being certain of the origin of many discoveries and >inventions that now benefit us. But they do in general benefit ALL of us, >and I believe that all subgroups/races within the human race as a whole >contributed to some degree. We should be moving forward in unity, not at >each others' throats over superficial genetic differences.
It's a Wonderful Race
by James Bronson There once was a college freshman named George who thought he knew it all. One night over dinner, George got into an argument with his father. The argument began when the young student tried to explain to his father that as White people, they should be held accountable for all the evils that they had inflicted upon non-Whites throughout history. George explained: "Because of European racism, we stole the Indians' land, we held blacks in slavery, we persecuted the Jews, and we plundered the environment. We've been oppressive racists for thousands of years so it's only fair that we pay economic reparations for all the harm we've done to the world. I'm pleased to see that we are ending our political and economic domination of the oppressed peoples."
George's dad was shocked to hear such talk. "Who put such commie-pinko nonsense into your head, boy? Did one of your sandal-wearing hippie college professors teach you that?" the father asked.
To which the son replied: "That's the truth dad. My anthropology professor, Dr.Irving Silverstein, says so. He ought to know. Dr. Silverstein is a well-respected Ph.D. People of your generation just don't understand because you were raised in a White supremacist racist society. That's why I've come to admire Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King as the greatest man in American history. He stood up to the racists of your generation. Because of him, my generation of White kids is completely colorblind."
The father angrily replied: "That's bullshit! I've always been fair-minded and tolerant of people from all backgrounds and races. I haven't 'oppressed' anybody, and furthermore there's nothing wrong with being proud of one's own people, including the European race of people. Your race is in your blood. It's like an extension of your biological family and you ought to be proud of your European heritage and identity, just like every other racial group in America is proud of its. Why is it OK for them to have a strong sense of racial identity but it's evil for us Europeans to feel that way?"
The young "intellectual" laughed at his father. "Come on dad, that's the kind of crap Hitler tried to peddle. Those racist attitudes were discredited years ago. There's only one race and that's the human race. Diversity is our greatest strength. Differences in so-called "race" are as insignificant as differences in belly buttons. And besides, UN statistics now show that low White birth rates, along with the fact that we live in an multicultural society, will mean that Europeans and their ethnocentrist and racist culture will have died out by the end of the century," young George said.
Turning red with anger, the father yelled: "You are a walking cliché you know that boy? And you think it's a good thing that the European peoples of the world will have faded out and ceased to exist?" Young George replied; "I think it's great! It will mean the end of racism and the end of hate. The oppressed peoples of the world would have been better off if us racist Europeans had never existed to begin with."
Suddenly there was a blast of cold wind, an explosion, and a huge smoke cloud. When the smoke had settled, George found himself alone and lost in a cold open field. An angel named Clarence then appeared to him and said "Well George, you've got your wish."
George asked: "Where am I? What's going on here? And who are you?"
The angel answered, "George, I'm Clarence the Angel. I was sent here to show you what the world would have been like if Europeans, or Whites, had never existed. You now live in a world where Europeans never existed."
"Oh. That's cool. I'll have no problem adapting because there's not a racist bone in my body. And when I get back to my world, I'll be able to tell my professor and my friends how great this non-racist world was. Say, I'm freezing my ass off out here. Where's the nearest motel?"
"Motel?" replied the angel. "There are no motels here in what was once called North America. But there are some caves up in those mountains where you can find shelter."
"Caves? No way man. I want a nice warm bed to sleep in."
"I don't think you understand George. There are no buildings here in non-white America because the evil Europeans never came here to build them. Whites never existed, remember? The natives live in tents. Would you like to go meet some local Indians? Perhaps they'll let you stay in a tent."
"A tent? But it's 10 degrees outside?...Oh well. It's better than a cave I suppose. Let's go talk to these Indians...... Wait a second, are these Indians friendly or hostile?"
"Why, George, that's a racist question to ask. Just because some Indians were brutal savages who scalped their victims alive, it doesn't mean they all were" said the angel sarcastically.
"I know that Clarence. And I'm not a racist. I hate racism. Nonetheless, I'd feel safer if I could have a gun to defend myself if they turn out to be violent."
"Gun?" replied the angel. "There are no guns for you to defend yourself with. Firearms were invented by evil Europeans. Though we could make a spear with those twigs over there."
"That's too much work. Give me a telephone then. I'll call the Indians to ask if it's OK."
"Telephone"? replied the angel. There are no telephones here. Alexander Graham Bell was another evil white man, so he never existed. No Europeans remember?" "Forget it then" replied George. "I'll sleep in the damn cave."
Upon arriving at the cave, a shivering George asked the angel for a lighter so that he could light a fire. "A lighter?" replied Clarence. "There are no lighters here, and no matches. Those are European gadgets and evil Europeans never existed remember? If you want to get warm, you need to do like the locals do and start rubbing twigs together."
"Oh come on man! You mean to tell me these people still rub sticks together for fire?"
"That's right George. The Indians live exactly as they did before the evil pilgrims arrived from Europe just a few centuries ago." said the angel sarcastically.
"I refuse to stay in this cold cave and I damn sure ain't gonna light a fire with twigs, and I refuse to sleep in a teepee. I'll go to South America. I can make it in a warmer climate and I'll adapt quickly to the great Incan civilization I learned about at college. Since European racists like Columbus, Cortez and Pizzaro never existed, the Incans will still be there. ... I need a car"
"Car?" replied the angel. "There are no cars here. Daimler and Benz, the evil German inventors of the internal combustion engine, were never born..nor was Henry Ford. There are no paved roads either. This is a world without evil Europeans remember?"
"No cars! Oh. I'll just have to take a train."
"There are no trains in this world either George. Evil Europeans weren't here to build locomotive engines or to discover the many uses of coal, oil and gas, or to build trains or lay tracks. But I'll allow you to cheat just a bit. Grab hold of my magic robe and we'll fly south."
George touched the angel's robe and they flew south until they arrived in an abandoned mud hut in the midst of Incan territory. George was grateful for the warm weather but it wasn't long until he began to complain about the heat and humidity.
"Clarence, this hut is a little shithole and I'm sweating up a storm here. Get me an air-conditioner please."
"Air-conditioner?" replied the angel. "There are no air-conditioners here. Air conditioning and refrigeration were inventions created by evil White men." "What?!! You mean to tell me that in the year 2002 these people still haven't figured out a way to keep themselves or their food cool? a frustrated George asked.
"No George, they haven't. And they never will."
"This is ridiculous. Let's go to the main city to see the Emperor. I can't live like this. Where's a car...oh I forget...no cars! Dammit I'll walk. let's go."
After walking through the jungle for about an hour or so, it began to get dark. George then asked Clarence to give him a flashlight so that he could see. "Flashlight? Sorry George, but Thomas Edison was an evil White man too...and he was never born. There are some branches over there if you want to make a torch."
"Never mind that!" George shouted back.
By morning time, Clarence and George had arrived at the temple of the Incans. A bloody human sacrifice was in progress. George turned to Clarence and cried, "They're going to butcher that poor soul! Somebody has got to stop this. What horrible murdering beasts! Can't anyone stop them?"
The angel replied "I'm afraid not. Ritual killings are common place here."Those evil European racists like Columbus, Cortez and Pizzaro never existed so the Incans just continued their brutal ways. In fact, it was the oppressed peoples themselves who made up the bulk of the Spanish armed forces. The people saw the Spaniards as liberators who would rid them of the oppressive Incan and Mayan rulers and give them a better life."
"I can't blame them for helping the Spaniards then. This is a horrible place. Get me out of this shithole now!" said George.
'Where would you like to go?" Clarence replied.
George said: "Take me to Africa, maybe there's a more advanced and humane civilization there that I can fit into. Where the nearest airport?"
"Oh, I forgot...no Wright Brothers." George said. "How about a boat?"
"Boats?" replied the angel. "I'm afraid the most seaworthy rafts available to you won't be of much help in crossing the vast Atlantic Ocean. The great Viking sailors and European navigators never existed. No Phoenicians, no Leif Erickson, no Henry the Navigator, no Columbus, no Magellan, no Hudson and no Robert Fulton. Even if you could build your own ship, there would be no compass for you to navigate with and no sextant either. I'm afraid you're stuck here George."
"Can I touch your robe and fly to Africa then" asked George.
"You're cheating again George, but all right. Touch my robe and we'll fly to Africa."
When they arrived in Africa, George saw thousands of half-naked African tribesmen being herded along a dirt path. They were guarded by other Africans with spears. "What are they doing to those poor men?" George asked Clarence.
"They are being enslaved by another tribe. Slavery was common in Africa long before the whites arrived." Clarence said. "In fact, most of the slaves who were shipped to the Americas were sold to the slave traders by African tribal leaders."
"That's so sad.' George said. "I want to meet Martin Luther King. Since his White assassin never existed, this great man should still be alive. He's probably a great tribal chief somewhere and leader of an advanced civilization. He will free these slaves from their African masters. Take me to him Clarence."
Clarence led George to a little hut deep in the heart of Africa. The naked women and children looked at George in wonder. The young men were out on a hunt but the older men stayed behind. George was led to the dingy little hut of the tribal witchdoctor and spiritual leader. There he saw a wild-looking man with a necklace of teeth around his neck and a huge ring pierced through his nose. "What the hell is that? George asked.
"Meet Witch-doctor Matunbo Lutamba Kinga" Clarence said. He never became Reverend Martin Luther King because there were no universities or seminaries built to educate him. Europeans weren't there to create such opportunities. But he did become the tribe's spiritual leader. He specializes in casting evil spells. Perhaps he can help you?"
The witch doctor gazed in wonder at George. Then he motioned to his henchmen to seize young George. The tribesmen grabbed hold of George and tied him to a nearby tree.
"Stop it! Let me go. What are they going to do to me?" cried George hysterically.
"They're going to perform a ritual killing on you George. The good doctor King...I mean Kinga -- believes that by cutting your heart out while you are still alive, it will bring good fortune and fertility to his tribe," laughed Clarence.
"Clarence! Clarence! Help me Clarence! Help me!
"But George, you told me that you wanted to go to Africa and to meet your hero Reverend King."
George said: "This part of Africa has not developed yet. I can see that now. Take me to North Africa where Egypt and Carthage established great civilizations. Just get me out of here, please."
Just as the witch doctor's spear was about to carve out George's heart, George vanished into thin air. He then found himself on the banks of the river Nile in Egypt.
"Thank you Clarence. Thank you," George said. "I don't understand it Clarence. Why does so much of the world remain so brutal and primitive? I learned during Black History Month about many talented black inventors and scientists. Garrett Morgan, George Washington Carver, Benjamin Banneker, Granville Woods. Then there's Dr. Carson, the preeminent brain surgeon in all of America. Where are these men?"
Clarence replied: "Don't you understand yet? America, and Africa, exist exactly as they did before the Europeans discovered them. Civilization as you had known it had only been introduced to these people just a few centuries ago by the Europeans. There are no universities, no hospitals, no means of transportation other than animals, no science, no medicine, no machines. In fact, the wheel hasn't even been discovered in Sub-Saharan Africa! Those black scientists, inventors, doctors, athletes, and entertainers you speak of were never given the opportunity to realize their full human potential because Europeans weren't around to introduce higher civilization and learning to them. There are no George Washington Carvers in this non-European world, no Dr. Carsons, no Booker T. Washingtons, no Benjamin Bannekers, no Michael Jordans, no Oprah Winfreys, no Bill Cosbys, no..."
"Stop it! That can't be!" cried George. "Let's walk over to the great pyramids of Egypt right now and I'll show you one of the great wonders of the world .....built by non-Whites"
They walked a few miles before George stopped and asked where the nearest toilet was. "Toilets?" replied the angel. There are no toilets or urinals in this world. Plumbing was developed by evil Europeans. The people in this non-White world still relieve themselves in open fields."
Clarence turned around so George could do his business. "I need some toilet paper." George said.
"Toilet paper?" replied the angel. "There..."
"I know. I know. Toilet paper hasn't been invented yet. Just hand me a rag then".
Clarence obliged and the two of them went on their way.
"I don't understand. According to my recollections from Geography class, the great pyramids should be near this very spot. We ought to be able to see them from miles away," said George.
"Well, George, I'm sure your professors at the college never told you this, but the ancient Egyptians were not black or brown. They were Caucasians. The anthropologists who examined the Egyptian mummies confirmed this fact. There are no pyramids and no Sphinx either. And the Carthaginians were White too."
George became depressed, but he was determined to prove his beliefs. "What's in Europe?" he asked.
"Europe became populated by Huns and other Asiatic tribes. They've settled down a bit but life is much the same as it is in North America. A nomadic existence based on hunting and food gathering. No great cities, no science, no buildings, no culture, no fine art - just a hard daily struggle against life and the elements of nature. In a Europe without evil Whites, the Roman Empire never existed nor did the Greeks. There was no Renaissance either."
"Take me to Asia then. Surely the great civilizations of Persia, India, China, and Japan will suit me" George said. "Clarence, to the Taj Mahal please." "The Taj Mahal?" replied the angel. "Don't you know that the ancient Persian and Indian civilizations were established by ancient Indo-European tribes who crossed the Himalayas? They are the ones who civilized India and built the Taj Mahal. Those are the great civilizations that Marco Polo, Columbus, and others were searching for.Did you know that Iran is Persian for "land of the Aryan?"
George said: "Don't tell me that the Indians were White men! That can't be. In the world I came from, I knew many Indians and they were not White!"
Clarence explained: "As the centuries passed, the Indo-Europeans who created Indian civilization intermarried with the native majorities who populated the Indian subcontinent. Gradually there were less and less evil White people until they faded out completely, along with the advanced civilization they had built. You will notice that there are still a few white-skinned and fair-haired Indians and Pakistanis around today -- in the world you came from that is.
George became worried. He knew he could never fit into the harsh primitive world he had been thrust into. Suddenly he thought of Japan. "Japan! I'll show you now Clarence. Take me to Japan. If the Japanese can make TVs and cameras then I'm sure I'll find a decent civilization that I can live in."
Clarence transported George to Japan. George observed that Japanese society was the most orderly, advanced and civil that he had seen, but it seemed as if almost everyone was either a rice farmer, a fisherman, or a soldier. There were no cars, no skyscrapers, no lights, no stereos, no sciences, no technologies, no universities. It was a stagnant agricultural society that seemed to have reached its high water mark and was incapable of moving forward. George knew he could not live here either.
Clarence explained to George: "Even the industrious Japanese and Chinese peoples had to rely on the evil Europeans to build the modern Asia that you had in mind. In this world, Japan exists exactly as it did before Commodore Perry's American naval ships arrived in Japan in the 1850s. There's no industry, no technology, no Fuji film, no Sony, no Hitachi, no Panasonic, no Toyota, no Sushi bars, no baseball...none of the trappings or comforts of modern life. These things don't exist in Japan or anywhere else because Europeans weren't there to create them and share them with the rest of the world. Would you care for a bowl of rice George?"
George began to feel sick in both his body and his mind. Not only was he depressed, but exposure to the harsh elements of nature had left him physically ill. "Clarence, I seem to have contracted some type of sickness. I must have some anti-biotics."
"Anti-biotics? There's no...
"Oh Shut up already! Then just take me back to the world as it was!"
"Sorry George. I'm not authorized to do that. Only my boss can make that call." Clarence said to him: "You see George. Your father was right. You really had a wonderful race. Don't you see what a foolish mistake it is to be ashamed and guilty about your own people, and to let them die out? This is what the world would be like without the creative spark of Edison and Ford and Pasteur and Marconi. No great scientists, or mathematicians, or inventors or fine artists. No Archimedes, no Aristotle, no Socrates, no Alexander, no Renaissance, no Newton, no Kepler, no Goddard, no Mendel, no Tesla, no Faraday, no Guttenberg, no Shakespeare, no Dickens, no Twain, no Mozart, no Beethoven, no Da Vinci, no Michelangelo, no Galileo, no Copernicus. No Venice, no Paris, no Lisbon, no Madrid, no Zurich, no Berlin, no St. Petersburg, no Budapest, no Rome, no Milan, no Vienna, no London, no New York, no Rio, no Sydney. No orchestras, no museums, no universities, no hospitals, no libraries, no theaters, no radio, no books, no television, no electricity, no refrigeration, no heating, no plumbing, no houses, no steel, no stadiums, no vaccines, no cars, no planes, no trains, no ships, no dentists, no surgeons, no computers, no telephones, and most important - there's no creative genius to be found that could create and sustain such a high level of civilization. There's nothing for the people of this world to build upon. It's just a daily struggle for subsistence. A brutal planet where the few people who aren't mired in eternal ignorance and darkness have reached their peak of civilization and are advancing no further."
Clarence went on to lecture the broken and depressed young man for seven days straight. He covered everything. History, science, economics, philosophy, art, literature, fine music, architecture, medicine, politics, agriculture, religion, and all the creations and contributions that the European peoples had made in every conceivable field of human endeavor. George listened closely to every word. He felt like a man who had been reborn.
After his lecture, Clarence the Angel floated away towards heaven. "I hope you have found all this to be educational, and I hope you have learned an important lesson. Enjoy your world George!" mocked the departing angel.
George began to sob like a baby. It was the year 2002 and he was alone and hungry in a backwards world where Europeans had never existed. He cried out to the stars: "Please God. I see what a fool I've been. I understand now what my father was trying to tell me. I want to go back to the world that I came from. A world where Europeans not only existed, but blessed the rest of humanity world with their unique creative ability. I want to live in a civilized world. Please God!...take me back!...take me back!...Oh God....please."
Suddenly George was transported back to his college dormitory. Drunk with joy, George jumped into the showers before he could even take his clothes off!.
"Warm water! and soap! Life is beautiful!" he screamed.
George's floor mates looked at him as if he was crazy. "George! Have you gone crazy?" asked a bewildered schoolmate.
"No my friend. I haven't taken leave of my senses. I've come to them!" George replied. George then began to sing classic European folk songs in the shower. Miraculously, he was able to sing in many different languages. He sang O Sole Mio in Italian, Amazing Grace in English, Gloire Immortelle in French, Das Ist Der Tag in German, and also Belgian, Spanish and French ballads and waltzes. Tears of sheer joy began to stream down his cheeks. The degenerate music of Hip-Hop and Rap lost all of its appeal to young George.
After his shower, George drove to a nearby restaurant and ordered two whole entrees. One was Lasagna and the other was a delicious Veal Marsala. With his Italian food he had a Greek salad with Spanish olives and Russian dressing, drank a whole bottle of French wine, followed by a German pastry for dessert. He finished his meal off with a hot cup of English tea and a Cuban cigar.
George said out loud: "Oh those European peoples and their delicious cuisine. Clarence was right after all. What a wonderful race!"
George was happy, but at the same time he realized there was much work to be done. He thought of all those poor whites in Rhodesia and South Africa who were being murdered and raped ever since they gave up control of those once-European nations. He thought of the many thousands of qualified Whites who were passed up for good jobs and college entrance because of racial quotas that discriminate against Europeans. He thought about the declining birthrates among all the European nations of the world. He remembered that Europeans everywhere were dwindling in numbers every year even as their own nations were being flooded with third world immigration. He recalled the O.J. Simpson verdict and how millions of blacks in America cheered when that brutal double murderer was set free by a black jury after he stabbed two Whites to death. He remembered the Los Angeles riots of 1992, where dozens of Whites were dragged out of their vehicles and killed like dogs in the streets by packs of White-hating monsters who were never even punished! He remembered the time when Jesse Jackson led a cheer at Stanford University: "Hey Hey Ho Ho, Western Civ. has got to go!" His European blood began to boil in righteous indignation when he recalled how Jesse Jackson once said he had spit in White people's food when he was a young restaurant worker. George now understood that that his people were on a collision course with worldwide disaster and genocide. George realized that this great people must not perish from the face of the earth.
George could not wait to see his father. He longed to embrace him and apologize for all of the foolish and disrespectful things he had said to him. But first, George had a score to settle with a certain college professor. He walked into Dr. Silverstein's auditorium and quietly took a seat in the back row. The nasal voiced Silverstein was lecturing on and on about racial and gender inequalities in European-centered civilizations. It was vintage Silverstein. George's impressionable White schoolmates, with their baggy pants, hip-hop clothes and backwards baseball caps, were swallowing Silverstein's poison pills hook, line and sinker. After letting Silverstein spew his cultural poison for about 15 minutes or so, George raised his hand so that he could give the professor a piece of his newly educated mind.
"George? Is that you? I remember you from last semester. I wasn't aware that you were here today. I failed to recognize you in that shirt and tie, and without your earrings. You must have enjoyed my course so much that you signed up again eh? Class, I'd like for you to meet George. He was one of my brightest students last semester. He truly has a thorough grasp of the ideas presented in this course. George, would you be so kind as to tell my class about that brilliant term paper you wrote about European racism, imperialism, and the need for monetary reparations?"
That's when young George let loose on the unsuspecting Professor.
"ENOUGH! You scheming devil! You mendacious fabricator of falsehoods! You pusillanimous purveyor of pinko propaganda! How dare you try to corrupt and manipulate our young minds when your filthy lies. We Europeans have nothing to be ashamed of, nothing to apologize for, and everything to be proud of. And most of all, we don't owe anybody jack-shit - not one thin dime! To the contrary, it is the rest of humanity that owes us a debt which can never be repaid! We are the rightful heirs and protectors of a rich cultural heritage. You vile manipulator! We are the sons of the Romans, the sons of the Greeks, the Celtics, the Vikings, the Normans, the Saxons. Why do you inflict shame and guilt upon us? We Europeans didn't just contribute to civilization...WE ARE CIVILIZATION! And I declare that I will no longer tolerate you shithead "intellectuals" trying to tear our people down. Never again will we walk on eggshells when we speak, always fearing that we might be called "racist." I no longer care what people think. All that matters is the truth which you have sought to pervert!"
"What are you up to anyway? Why do you to corrupt my young peers by shoving false heroes down their throats. Enough of your Marxist games of divide and conquer, you commie pinko subversive! I don't want to learn anymore about Martin Luther King, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton or Black History Month. They would not have amounted to anything without the institutions of high civilization created by the European peoples. I'm going to set this class straight about who the truly great men of history are - the European statesmen, scientists, explorers, monarchs, navigators, conquerors, inventors, artists, writers, philosophers - the innovative giants of history that you and your ilk have erased from our collective memories. You speak of a world liberated from European influence? Permit me tell your students about such a world, Silverstein, because I can speak from personal experience, you wretched little conspiring monster!"
Silverstein turned white as a ghost. He was shell-shocked and rendered speechless for the first time in his career! Never in all of his years at the University had a student dared to so boldly challenge his falsehoods. Speaking from the heart as well as the mind, and with an eloquence he never thought he could muster, George broke out into a 60-minute monologue on history, science, philosophy, culture, and all the other attributes that constitute high civilization. The young students were captivated by George's brilliant oratory. Many were moved to tears. By the end of his tirade, George's reawakened classmates were thundering their approval of his speech. The class gave George a standing ovation and they thanked him for helping them rediscover and reclaim their own sense of pride and lost identity. The unstoppable power of truth had melted away years of Marxist guilt tripping, self hate, wimpishness and cultural brainwashing in just one unforgettable hour. The inspired students proceeded to storm out of Silverstein's class, throwing their hip-hop baseball caps and nose earrings at him as they stampeded out and vowed never to return. They lifted George up upon their shoulders and carried him out of the auditorium like a conquering hero. With a glint in his eye, George glanced up towards the sky, winked and said "Thank you, Clarence."
Dr. Silverstein was left humiliated and visibly shaken. He knew that these reawakened European kids could never again be brainwashed with "political correctness" and White guilt. Silverstein's greatest fear was that more of these proud European youths would one day reawaken and take their country and civilization back from the Silversteins of the world.
Silverstein was worried, but he remained confident that most young men and women would never learn the truth about their glorious past and unique creative abilities. After all, the mass media, Hollywood, the music industry, the colleges, and the public schools are all controlled by "liberals" like Dr. Silverstein. With the power of political correctness in their hands, they can continue to tear down our European ancestors, destroy our institutions and traditions, instigate blacks and other races against the whites, flood America with third-world immigration, and push "hip-hop" music, homosexuality, and other garbage onto a weak, confused and morally degenerate youth. After reflecting upon these facts, Silverstein smiled a devilish grin and muttered to himself: "A few of these European sheep may wake up to what's being done to them, but the majority of these idiots never will." And he smiled again....and laughed with diabolical Marxist glee. Then he repeated to himself "No...they will never figure it all out until it's too late."
Granted, Caucasians may have achieved far more than any other "race" to advance civilization, but history is always uncertain and we must face the facts of the present and plan for the future. We are now, like it or not, a multi-cultural, multi-racial society. I choose to live in peace as far as I can, in cooperation with ALL people that seek a future of continued advancement and minimum conflict. I agree that Jews have undue influence in the media, but the answer lies in creating alternative media, not destroying Jews or anyone else, or trampling upon their rights and freedoms. I hope you can find peace of mind and learn to live in cooperation with your fellow man, without PREJUDGING anyone by their skin color or national origin.