Tactics of Organized Jewry in Suppressing Free Speech Prof. Tony Martin - Institute for Historical Review http://www.ihr.org/other/TonyMartin2002.html ... I'm going to try to extract from my experience certain basic sort of tactics that I think the Jewish lobby has used over the years pertaining to my particular situation ... The first and major tactic that I discovered in their attack on me was their reliance on lies -- just straight-up lies. There's no other way to describe it, just telling lies. Many of the categories that I will enumerate overlap, and many of them could also come under this general rubric of telling lies. But I think that if one had to isolate a single tactic, it was a tactic of telling lies. I think they've elevated telling lies to a very high artistic form.
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:09:41 -0400, "Freedom Man" <*firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>And I suppose Hitler never told a lie - >
Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was in favor of big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that Hitler was right. Here is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in context:
"But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the Fatherland to justice. All this was inspired by the principle--which is quite true in itself--that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they are more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes. "From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true. He (Schopenhauer) called the Jew 'The Great Master of Lies'. Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth to prevail."
"Topaz" <email@example.com> wrote in message news:firstname.lastname@example.org... > On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:09:41 -0400, "Freedom Man" > <email@example.com> wrote: > >>And I suppose Hitler never told a lie -
> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The > Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was > in favor of big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that > Hitler was right. Here is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in > context:
< snip >
That Jews are a race as Hitler stated, not a religion or culture, is something of a lie in itself. How could he determine this, given the rudimentary genetic science of his day? In most cases their skin is white.
ALL politicians and governments LIE, and LIE BIG TIME! Hitler may be a god to you, but he was no exception.
2014-03-23 04:54:28 EST
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:06:37 -0400, "Freedom Man" <*firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >That Jews are a race as Hitler stated, not a religion or culture, is >something of a lie in itself.
They certainly aren't just a religion, which is what he meant.
Jews are an ethnic group. They are not just a religion. If a Jew becomes a Christian or an atheist he still says he is a Jew. Most of the Jews in the Jew country are atheist. They say that a Jew is anyone that has a Jewish mother. Therefore it is a hereditary thing.
We are for having a nation of White people. Jews would be White enough to join us if it weren't for other important factors. One factor is that they don't want our race to live. They want to be the only Caucasians to survive on the earth.
The Jews have their own Jew country, but they demand multi-culture and pluralism for us. Their leaders agree with something Hitler wrote:
"A State which, in an epoch of racial adulteration, devotes itself to the duty of preserving the best elements of its racial stock must one day become ruler of the Earth."
Jews are enemies of White civilization. Here are some quotes from a very pro-Jewish book that was first published in 1925. The book is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis Browne.
"But save for such exceptions, the Jews who led or participated in the heroic efforts to remold the world of the last century, were neither Reform or Orthodox. Indeed, they were often not professing Jews at all. "For instance, there was Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne, both unfaltering champions of freedom. And even more conspicuously, there was Karl Marx, one of the great prophetic geniuses of modern times. "Jewish historians rarely mention the name of this man, Karl Marx, though in his life and spirit he was far truer to the mission of Israel than most of those who were forever talking of it. He was born in Germany in 1818, and belonged to an old rabbinic family. He was not himself reared as a Jew, however, but while still a child was baptized a Christian by his father. Yet the rebel soul of the Jew flamed in him throughout his days, for he was always a 'troubler' in Europe."
"Then, of course, there are Ludwig Borne and Heinrich Heine, two men who by their merciless wit and sarcasm became leaders among the revolutionary writers. Karl Marx, Ferdinand Lassalle, Johann Jacoby, Gabriel Riesser, Adolphe Cremieux, Signora Nathan- all these of Jewish lineage played important roles in the struggle that went throughout Europe in this period. Wherever the war for human liberty was being waged, whether in France, Germany, Austria, Hungary, or Italy, there the Jew was to be found. It was little wonder that the enemies of social progress, the monarchists and the Churchmen, came to speak of the whole liberal movement as nothing but a Jewish plot."
"The Jews had become the money lenders of Europe for quite evident reasons. The Church sternly forbade all Christians to engage in the pursuit... "So the Jews became the money lenders of Europe. They developed a great shrewdness and cunning in the one and only field of opportunity left open to them. And with their shrewdness and cunning they developed a certain cruelty and greed. That was natural. The world was cruel to them, so when the chance was theirs, they were cruel in return..."
Who Is a Jew? DNA Can Hold the Key The Telegraph (Britain) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/7346496/View-from-the-Lab-Who-is-a-Jew-DNA-can-hold-the-key.html
.. .. Even 20 years later the thought of a genetic test for Jewish descent would have been treated with horror. Now, one has emerged and is not despised but hailed by many Jews themselves. A scan of half a million variable sites across the genomes of several hundred Europeans and Americans, each aware from their family history of having had a recent Jewish or a non-Jewish ancestry, gave an absolute separation between Jews and others: even a single Jewish grandparent was enough to provide an unambiguous identity, written in DNA.
>How could he determine this, given the rudimentary genetic science of his >day? In most cases their skin is white. > >ALL politicians and governments LIE, and LIE BIG TIME! >Hitler may be a god to you, but he was no exception. >
Hitler was the big exception.
Franklin Roosevelt did some things to help people. But he didn't really upset the money bag parasites who rule over us. Only Hitler did that.
When Hitler came to power, Germany was hopelessly broke. The Treaty of Versailles had imposed crushing reparations on the German people, demanding that Germans repay every nation's cost of the (First World) war. These costs totaled three times the value of all the property in Germany.
Jewish currency speculators caused the German mark to plummet, precipitating one of the worst runaway inflations in modern times. A wheelbarrow full of 100 billion-mark banknotes could not buy a loaf of bread. The national treasury was empty. Countless homes and farms were lost to Jewish speculators and private banks. Germans lived in hovels. They were starving.
Nothing like this had ever happened before - the total destruction of the national currency, plus the wiping out of people's savings and businesses. On top of all this came a global depression. Germany had no choice but to succumb to debt slavery under international Jewish bankers until 1933, when the National Socialists came to power. At that point, the German government thwarted the international Jewish banking cartels by issuing its own money. World Jewry responded by declaring a global economic boycott of Germany.
Hitler began a national credit program by devising a plan of public works that included flood control, repair of public buildings and private residences, and construction of new roads, bridges, canals, and port facilities. All these were paid for with money that no longer came from the private international Jewish bankers.
The projected cost of these various programs was fixed at one billion units of the national currency. To pay for this, the German government issued bills of exchange, called Labor Treasury Certificates. In this way, the National Socialists put people to work.
Under the National Socialists, Germany's money wasn't backed by gold. It was essentially a receipt for labor and materials delivered to the government. Hitler said, "For every mark issued, we require the equivalent of a mark's worth of work done, or goods produced." Workers spent those Certificates on other people's goods and services, thus creating more jobs for more people. In this way, the German people climbed out of the crushing debt imposed on them by the Jew bankers.
Within two years, the unemployment problem had been solved, and Germany was back on it's feet. It had a solid, stable currency with no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the US and other Western countries were still out of work. Within five years, Germany went from being the poorest nation in Europe to the richest!
Germany even managed to restore foreign trade, despite the global boycott by Jew-owned enterprises, and the denial of foreign credit by Jew-owned banks. Germany succeeded in this by exchanging equipment and commodities directly with other countries, using a barter system that cut the Jew bankers out of the picture. Germany flourished, since barter eliminates national debt and trade deficits.
Germany's economic freedom was short-lived; but it left several monuments, including the famous Autobahn, the world's first extensive superhighway. This economic freedom made Hitler extremely popular with the German people. Germany was rescued from English economic theory, which says that all currency must be borrowed against the gold owned by a private and secretive banking cartel - such as the Federal Reserve, or the European Central Bank - rather than issued by the government for the benefit of the people.
In "Billions For The Bankers, Debts For The People" (1984), Shelton Emry commented:
"Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which accounts for Germany's startling rise from the depression to a world power in five years. The German government financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. It took the entire Capitalist and Communist worlds to destroy the German revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Jewish bankers."
"Topaz" <email@example.com> wrote in message news:firstname.lastname@example.org... > On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:06:37 -0400, "Freedom Man" > <email@example.com> wrote: > >> >>That Jews are a race as Hitler stated, not a religion or culture, is >>something of a lie in itself. > > They certainly aren't just a religion, which is what he meant. > > Jews are an ethnic group. They are not just a religion. If a Jew > becomes a Christian or an atheist he still says he is a Jew. Most of > the Jews in the Jew country are atheist. They say that a Jew is anyone > that has a Jewish mother. Therefore it is a hereditary thing.
If a Jew becomes a Christian, he then calls himself a Christian. If an atheist, he may not want to admit that because atheists are hated even more than Jews are. That "they say that a Jew is anyone that has a Jewish mother" is a matter of opinion, not a genetically provable reality.
> We are for having a nation of White people. Jews would be White enough > to join us if it weren't for other important factors. One factor is > that they don't want our race to live. They want to be the only > Caucasians to survive on the earth.
I have seen no evidence this is so. No doubt a few Jews are fanatically inclined like that, but most are not. "A nation of white people" is racist, and wrong, simply because no criteria beyond superficial skin color is used as a basis for judgement of quality.
As I've said before, most geneticists believe crossbreeding between the human "races" will be beneficial in the long run. Inbreeding brings out the recessive genes, often with consequent diseases and defects. And I have known too many good dark-skinned people, and evil white ones, to believe that skin color alone determines the quality of a person's character. You read a lot of Hitler's writings - try some of Martin Luther King Jrs. Or do you think his dark skin disqualifies him from having any valid opinions?
2014-03-24 05:45:16 EST
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 10:38:20 -0400, "Freedom Man" <*firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >If a Jew becomes a Christian, he then calls himself a Christian.
True, but he also calls himself a Jew.
> If an >atheist, he may not want to admit that because atheists are hated even more >than Jews are.
They once executed people for saying the earth went around the sun. Atheists may have been hated in the past but not so much today. Most Jews who are atheists don't deny that. But either way they still say they are Jews.
>That "they say that a Jew is anyone that has a Jewish mother" >is a matter of opinion, not a genetically provable reality.
According to Jewish law, a child born to a Jewish mother or an adult who has converted to Judaism is considered a Jew; one does not have to reaffirm their Jewishness or practice any of the laws of the Torah to be Jewish. According to Reform Judaism, a person is a Jew if they were born to either a Jewish mother or a Jewish father. Also, Reform Judaism stresses the importance of being raised Jewish; if a child is born to Jewish parents and was not raised Jewish then the child is not considered Jewish. According to the Orthodox movement, the fathers religion and whether the person practices is immaterial. No affirmation or upbringing is needed, as long as the mother was Jewish.
>I have seen no evidence this is so. No doubt a few Jews are fanatically >inclined like that, but most are not.
Jews Play Leading Role in Promoting 'Multiculturalism' Israel Broadcasting Authority (Israel) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtVEUaCKOh0&feature=em-share_video_user
Europeans must "learn to be multicultural," says Jewish activist Barbara Lerner Spectre. During an interview in Sweden with Israeli media, this US-born woman adds that "Jews will be resented because of our leading role" in bringing about this "huge transformation" of Europe. Runtime: 1:17 mins.
>"A nation of white people" is racist, and wrong,
"Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."
"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan, but nobody says Japan should solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."
"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."
"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"
"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"
"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"
"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."
> simply because no criteria >beyond superficial skin color is used as a basis for judgement of quality.
The main goal of America is to destroy White civilization by mixing Whites with other races. Because of this it will get harder and harder to find White neighborhoods (good neighborhoods) to live in. We should preserve our race by having a homeland of our own.
Our opponents say it is impossible to have White homeland because they say we can not determine who is White and who is not. Even though they can determine this easily enough when they want affirmative action, they say that we can not.
It is the same as if they said we can not determine red cars from cars that are not red. They would say that it is impossible to call a car red until we have an exact definition of what is red. It would be reasonable if they pointed out that some cars are borderline and it would be hard to say if they are red or not. But that is not what they are saying. They are saying that we can not in any case tell if a car is red or not.
If a car looks red enough to me then I will call it red. And if people look White enough to me then I will call them White.
> >As I've said before, most geneticists believe crossbreeding between the >human "races" will be beneficial in the long run. Inbreeding brings out the >recessive genes, often with consequent diseases and defects.
Most geneticists would be unemployed if they said otherwise. Anyway they are wrong. Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
"All that we admire in the world to-day, its science, its art, its technical developements and discoveries, are the products of the creative activities of a few peoples, and it may be true that their first beginnings must be attributed to one race. The maintenance of civilization is wholly dependant on such peoples. Should they perish, all that makes this earth beautiful will descend with them into the grave."
"All the great civilizations of the past became decadent because the originally creative race died out, as a result of the contamination on the blood."
"Every manifestation of human culture, every product of art, science and technical skill, which we see before our eyes to-day, is almost exclusively the product of the Aryan creative power. This very fact fully justifies the conclusion that it was the Aryan alone who founded a superior type of humanity"
"The foundations of actual life in Japan to-day are not those of the native Japanese culture., although this characterizes the exterenal features of the country, which features strike the eye of European observers on account of their fundamental difference from us; but the real foundations of contemporary Japanese life are the enormous scientific and technical achievements of Europe and America, that is to say, of Aryan peoples."
"A people that fails to preserve the purity of its racial blood thereby destroys the unity of the soul of the nation in all its manifestations. A disintegrated natioanal character is the inevitable consequence of the process of disintegration in the blood. And the change which takes place in the spiritual and creative faculties of a people is only an effect of the change that had modified its racial substance."
"For in a world which would be composed of mongrels and negroids all ideals of human beauty and nobility and all hopes of an idealized future for our humanity would be lost forever."
"It is especially the cultural creativeness which disappears when a superior race inter-mixes with an inferior one."
"There may be hundreds of excellent States in this earth, and yet if the Aryan, who is the creator and custodian of civilization, should disappear, all culture that is on an adequate level with the spiritual needs of the superior nations to-day would also disappear."
"We National Socialists know that in holding these views we take up a revolutionary stand in the world to-day and that we are branded as revolutionaries. But our views and our conduct will not be determined by the approbation or disapprobation of our contemporaries, but only by our duty to follow a truth which we have acknowledged. In doing this we have reason to believe that posterity will have a clearer insight"
"Thus for the first time a high inner purpose is accredited to the State. In face of the ridiculous phrase that the State should do no more than act as the guardian of public order and tranquillity, so that everybody can peacefully dupe everybody else, it is given a very high mission indeed to preserve and encourage the highest type of humanity which a beneficent Creator has bestowed on this earth."
> And I have >known too many good dark-skinned people, and evil white ones, to believe >that skin color alone determines the quality of a person's character.
Both White people and Black people could be "good" or "bad". But Whites are on average much more intelligent than Blacks. That is why Africa is so backward and other Black countries are the third world and Black neighborhoods in the USA are also bad.
> You >read a lot of Hitler's writings - try some of Martin Luther King Jrs. Or do >you think his dark skin disqualifies him from having any valid opinions? >
He might have had a valid opinion. But I don't know what it might have been.
You take the words of Hitler as your gospel, and have found much agreement among others of your persuasion. I do not accept "gospels," only what makes sense in the light of history and the interests and desires of sane people. Among these desires are peace, freedom, and acceptance. Naziism offers autocracy, rejection, hatred, and conflict.
I see nothing "anti-white" or anti-anyone in accepting ALL human beings as one race with superficial though visible differences. I doubt you will ever find peace, especially personal peace of mind, through your present beliefs.
2014-03-25 17:42:16 EST
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 11:26:11 -0400, "Freedom Man" <*email@example.com> wrote:
>You take the words of Hitler as your gospel, and have found much agreement >among others of your persuasion. >I do not accept "gospels," only what makes sense in the light of history and >the interests and desires of sane people.
The Jews control your media.
This is what President Nixon said:
"There may be some truth in that if the Arabs have some complaints about my policy towards Israel, they have to realize that the Jews in the U.S. control the entire information and propaganda machine, the large newspapers, the motion pictures, radio and television, and the big companies. And there is a force that we have to take into consideration."
>Among these desires are peace, freedom, and acceptance. Naziism offers >autocracy,
Many people think they arrive at their own ideas all by themselves, when in fact their ideas are usually made for them by Hollywood. Take two movies that are anti-leadership propaganda, Gladiator, and Braveheart.
In Gladiator they show a corrupt leader of Rome, but would it be corrupt if Maximus was the leader? That would be much better than having the lame senators running Rome. And of course in Braveheart the Scots should have made William their leader. If he was the leader he could have put the corrupt nobles in their place.
The purpose of the propaganda is to stop good people from wanting power. The people who have the real power now, the bankers and the media, are not threatened in the least by libertarians. But if there was a leader that was really for the people they know they would be put in their place.
In democracies money talks and those who can buy TV stations are the rulers. These rulers don't even claim to be for anything but their own profits and interests. People are much better off with a good leader who has power above the money power.
We should have a nation for White people and not one that is run by Jews who hate the White race.
"I was listening to a speech that he gave in Sweden. You can listen at the Url below if ya want. http://www.davidduke.com/
Anyway, the guy made an analogy that sums it all up.
He said, lets look at Iceland. They have one of the worlds lowest crime rates, and have some of the worlds highest test scores.
He then went on to say: Haiti is rich in natural resources, they have great weather, beaches etc.. Yet its a murder, rape capital of the world. etc, etc.
He went on to say: If we were to take all of the people from Haiti & Move them to Iceland, Well, they would soon die.
Take those from Iceland and move them to Haiti and within one generation Haiti would be paradise on earth.
He explained it better than I did. But you should get the gist of the Iceland / Haiti analogy. Better yet, listen to the Stockholm speech and hear it for yourself.."
"Precisely because we are nationally minded, for that very reason we have respect for the national feelings of other peoples. And our national pride does not mean we scorn other peoples, it means that we respect and love our own people. It is precisely the Internationalists who prevent peoples from coming to understand one another." Adolf Hitler
"Not hatred toward other peoples, but love toward the German nation." Hitler, Berlin October 24, 1933
General Leon Degrelle was the leader of the Belgian contingent of the Waffen SS. He was in 75 hand-to-hand combat actions against the Marxists. This is what he wrote: "German racialism has been deliberately distorted. It never was "anti-other race"... National Socialist racialism was not against the other races, it was for its own race. It aimed at defending and improving its race and wished that all other races did the same for themselves. It was demonstrated when the Waffen SS enlarged its ranks to include 60,000 Islamic SS troops. The Waffen SS respected their way of life, their customs and their religious beliefs. Each Islamic SS battalion had an iman; each company had a mullah. It was our common wish that their qualities found their highest expression... I was present when each of my Islamic comrades received a personal gift from Hitler during the new year. It was a pendant with a small Koran. He was honouring them with what was the most important aspect of their lives and their history."
> and conflict.
Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
"the problem of how the future of the German nation can be secured is the problem of how Marxism can be exterminated."
"The largest so-called bourgeois mass meetings were accustomed to dissolve, and those in attendance would run away like rabbits when frightened by a dog as soon as a dozen communists appeared on the scene."
"We used to roar with laughter at these silly faint-hearted bourgeosie and their efforts to puzzle out our origin, our intentions, and our aims. "We chose red for our posters after particular and careful deliberation, our intention being to irritate the Left, so as to arouse their attention and tempt them to come to our meetings--if only to break them up--so that in this way we got a chance of talking to the people."
"At meetings, particularly outside Munich, we had in those days from five to eight hundred opponents against fifteen to sixteen National Socialists; yet we brooked no interference, for we were ready to be killed rather than capitulate. More than once a handful of party colleagues offered a heroic resistance to a raging and violent mob of Reds. Those fifteen or twenty men would certainly have been overwhelmed in the end had not the opponents known that three or four times as many of themselves would first get their skulls cracked. And that was a risk they were not willing to run."
When Hitler marched through the streets with his Storm Troops he carried a walking stick. The Reds came to oppose them and throw stones and things, but when it got very bad Hitler would raise the stick. This was the signal to his men to clear the streets of the Reds. And soon there was not a Red left to be found.
>I see nothing "anti-white" or anti-anyone in accepting ALL human beings as >one race with superficial though visible differences. >I doubt you will ever find peace, especially personal peace of mind, through >your present beliefs. >
We should preserve the White race.
"One of the most astounding instances of Jewish hypocrisy was uttered by a Jew named Isi Leibler, who is no less than the chairman of the governing board of the World Jewish Congress. Now Isi Leibler is well-known as a powerful Jew in Australia, where he was for years the official head of the Jewish community there. He now lives in Israel.
In an interview with a Jerusalem newspaper, he stated about Israel "This is a country which was set up and created as a Jewish country for the Jews." In an essay he wrote for the World Jewish Congress, he decried intermarriage between Jews and non-Jews as a kind of racial suicide, and likened assimilation with non-Jews as a slow bleeding to death of the Jewish people. He emphasized that focus of Israeli policy should be to sharpen and intensify Jewish identity and that even giving up territory was acceptable if it meant getting rid of non-Jews and making Israel a more nearly all-Jewish state. Leibler argues that post-Zionists threaten Israel when they publish textbooks that de-emphasize Jewish racial interests and replace them with "universalist" history. In the interview mentioned, Leibler went so far as to say: "Multiculturalism has no place in Israel. Israel was created as a Jewish state for the Jews." That's the Jew Isi Leibler talking about his own people's country, talking about Israel.
[Leibler, Isi: Is the Dream Ending? Post-Zionism and its Discontents - A Threat to the Jewish Future, Institute of the World Jewish Congress, Israel]
But what was Isi Leibler saying when he lived in Australia, a White country, a non-Jewish country? What was Isi Leibler saying when he was the head of Australia's powerful Jewish minority? Isi Leibler's advice to Israel is to protect its racial and cultural heritage.
Isi Leibler's advice to Jews is to avoid intermarriage. Isi Leibler thinks it's just fine -- even necessary -- to separate non-Jews from Jews in Israel, to get non-Jews on the other side of a well-defended border, to throw them out of Israel. But to Australians Isi Leibler played quite a different tune. When Australian politician Pauline Hanson was galvanizing White Australians in 1993 with her questioning of the wisdom of non-White immigration to that country, Leibler warned that "extremists" were threatening precious multiculturalism. He said: "There is a need to sit together and establish a way in which Australians can recapture that spirit of multiculturalism which I think we are all proud being part and parcel of, and which is really under threat?" [Australian Herald-Sun, September 27, 2000]
How much clearer does it have to be before you see it? Leibler and his fellow powerful Jews want racial nationalism for their own people, because racial nationalism makes them strong and ensures their survival. They want racial nationalism because they want their kind to survive and racial nationalism is the key to survival. They're not stupid. They want what is best for Jews.
But Leibler and his fellow powerful Jews don't want racial nationalism for White people. In Australia and Europe and South Africa and the United States - wherever White people live -- Leibler and his kind in Jewish organizations and in the Jewish-controlled media do everything in their power to destroy racial nationalism for White people, everything in their power to keep us from having it, everything in their power to make it disreputable and impossible and illegal. Just the other day, Leibler said that one of the most important things in the world to him was Israel's "right to exist as a sovereign Jewish state." [Israel Insider, November 24, 2002]
But Leibler and his co-racialists in the Jewish ADL and other groups devote their lives and their billions to preventing White people from claiming their right to sovereign White states. Keeping Britain British, or keeping America American, or keeping France French, is anathema to them, it is the ultimate in evil and they never let us forget that."
"Topaz" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message news:email@example.com... > On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 11:26:11 -0400, "Freedom Man" > <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > >>You take the words of Hitler as your gospel, and have found much agreement >>among others of your persuasion. >>I do not accept "gospels," only what makes sense in the light of history >>and >>the interests and desires of sane people. > > The Jews control your media. > > This is what President Nixon said:
That CROOK Nixon has no credibility with me. I am well aware that the mass media is controlled, but not exclusively by Jews or Zionists.
> "There may be some truth in that if the Arabs have some complaints > about my policy towards Israel, they have to realize that the Jews in > the U.S. control the entire information and propaganda machine, the > large newspapers, the motion pictures, radio and television, and the > big companies. And there is a force that we have to take into > consideration."
They control much through corporate ownership, but not everything.
>>Among these desires are peace, freedom, and acceptance. Naziism offers >>autocracy, > > Many people think they arrive at their own ideas all by themselves, > when in fact their ideas are usually made for them by Hollywood. Take > two movies that are anti-leadership propaganda, Gladiator, and > Braveheart.
Screw Hollywood and the commercial media. I for one think for myself. Thus I see through the lies, propaganda and coverups, and I know that 9/11 was an inside job conspiracy.
> In Gladiator they show a corrupt leader of Rome, but would it be > corrupt if Maximus was the leader? That would be much better than > having the lame senators running Rome. And of course in Braveheart the > Scots should have made William their leader. If he was the leader he > could have put the corrupt nobles in their place. > > The purpose of the propaganda is to stop good people from wanting > power. The people who have the real power now, the bankers and the > media, are not threatened in the least by libertarians. But if there > was a leader that was really for the people they know they would be > put in their place. > > In democracies money talks and those who can buy TV stations are > the rulers. These rulers don't even claim to be for anything but their > own profits and interests. People are much better off with a good > leader who has power above the money power. > >>rejection, > > We should have a nation for White people and not one that is run by > Jews who hate the White race.
Most Jews ARE WHITE. And most whites are, genetically, not PURELY white. But all are HUMAN, and that is what counts to me!